you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 10 months ago (30 children)

Well, whoever posted it just linked them, didn't they?

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 10 months ago* (29 children)

    Shown it on a TV that did the whole gig of Snowden right before Snowden showed up and they did him too, without him, too.

    All over a decade ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    Am I too high, or does whatever you just said make no sense at all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (20 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (19 children)

    Is that a quote from the old show?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    No. Just describing the reality behind the picture posted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    What does it mean, what does newsroom mean in context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (16 children)

    It's a three season show that told it didn't tell what Snowden said right before Snowden did it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (15 children)

    It did not say what Snowden said, before he did say it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    show that told it didn’t tell what Snowden said

    The show did not say what Snowden said

    right before Snowden did it.

    And they did not say it before Snowden did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    You either didn't watch it or didn't understand what was said. I know. I understand. They talk so fast with so many dimensions on perspectives it's difficult to be aware of much of it.

    Still, they did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    I'm just trying to figure out what you're saying. I'm guessing you have a different primary language

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago* (10 children)

    No. Listening to them and picking their pi holes did open a few (understated, sarcastically if you haven't seen it yet) dim's I'm still sorting though, in all fairness. That, and I've picked those up a few exponentials I've not even begun "counting" yet.

    Stephen McKinley Henderson's Solomon Hancock

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    So what are you, a troll that speaks nonsense? Is that your accounts gag

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Depends who actually can read. Or even ask a question without an insult.

    Trolls insult. Exactly how do you feel offended, personally?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Offended, what? You talk in nonsense and refuse to explain any of it. That's why I'm asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Which instance is the aneurysm posting community on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I've been banned from your Lemmy for talking like this. Apparently there are unwritten rules for talking about blindmensions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Have you tried not talking like ai slop?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    New question: How tall is the world's tallest building?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    That's not a question. That's a run around and find someone else's achievement.

    You want to talk with me about yours or mine? Or shit, we do both. I'll even sideswipe your original postulation of a "question" and reference what it used to be.

    Ever seen an old set of US dollar bill arrays?

    Know what a Talisman is?

    Fold those pre-9-11 (k)not-paper bucks and watch the towers do what happens then and there if you stand and watch them from seeing through the Washington Arch.

    In that obvious order, 5-10-20-50-100 shown that event broadcast for decades to all the masses.

    Of course, that's an Aeon ago. And the reprinted all that sigil to help people forget what really happen and subscribe to being watched at all seconds of life letting go of all sense of law that might prevent such.

    But Drugs-Are-Bad-Mkay-lobe-ultra.

    You ever do them and do anything other than be the asshole they tell you that the people who do are, you'll see something else. You'll be something else. You won't be what they told you to be.

    Living isn't being a Golem. Living is doing logic that we just don't quite have words to describe exactly how money isn't real like that tape measure in your toolbox isn't real space.

    It's a measure but other factors of other dimension's change even the very nature of those dimensions like Yin-Yang short shows the concept.

    What do you think the height of the building was important to the time traveling tight rope walker betwen those towers.

    Towers of Job right there. And you thought that was work.

    ->FACEPALM<-

    Like, oh, you thought that was sandalwood and the spear was it? Time is just not to be used lie that and then you might see words that don't exist, yet, again.

  • source
  • parent