[–] 2 points 1 month ago

This is pretty sick, i also appreciate the archived copy.

This program provides a framework for other states to follow in California, and soon Washington's, footsteps in cutting down greenhouse gasses. its also initial steps for a federal program.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Even then, another bonus with biking vs drinking and driving, you can get off your bike and walk home with your bike. With cars you can't do the same, and, at least in my area, there a lot of times you can leave your car overnight at places. So there's a huge incentive to drive it or pay for a ticket (which of course, pay the ticket over a DUI, but still).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago* (16 children)

    Most places i feel you can get away with riding drunk. Not swervey drunk, but more intoxicated than you should drive in a car. I don't feel cops really care too much for drunk cyclists.

    I mention this, because some people drive drunk in a 2 ton vehicle capable for killing or maiming others. Those same drivers on a bicycle would be better (though there's still a chance for injury and death, more of that risk is to the rider than others)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    This would help for sure, but housing stock is just so low in the US that prices will still remain high until that is fixed... or a large portion of the population dies.

    To expand on this person's point for those not aware, economists believe that the 30 year loan is detrimental to the movement of house stock and also leads to unfair economical advantages to those that can afford them.

    With 30 year loans, there's always a likelihood that mortgage rates will drop at some point in the loan, meaning you will probably refinance as low as possible when the opportunity presents itself. Because of this, when people's lives change, they're more reticent to move to another home because they'll likely lose their current low mortgage rate. Right now we're experiencing that since about 4ish years ago we had very low mortgage rates, that have since spiked. Older couples who's kids are adults that moved out? might not want to move to a smaller home that better suits their lifestyle without kids around. Possible new job opportunity elsewhere in the country or even the state? The pay needs to be high enough, and job reliable enough, to ensure that moving into a new home with a higher interest rate is worth it. All these examples lead to people not moving from existing homes, which becomes a sort of domino effect of people not leaving their existing homes and maybe unable to move to more appropriate homes. My understanding is, we're the only country in the world with a 30 year fixed loan. Other countries either have shorter fixed loans, or mixed loans(fixed for 10 years, then adjustable for the next 10 years, with limits on how much it changes).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 76 points 3 months ago (51 children)

    This image seems like misleading bull shit. This seems to be the law referenced: https://apnews.com/article/minnesota-artificial-intelligence-nudification-x-elon-musk-deepfake-131184be939d540de093b567b12c9e16

    It makes companies liable for people using ai for nudification (which of course includes children). Musk argues the law is a bit to far reaching ( claims the law considers some body parts, that are commonly displayed in public, as private parts and also that the company can get in trouble for people nudifying themselves).

    I don't know how legitimate Musk's concerns are, but the image is extremely misleading.

  • source
  •  

    My cousin had encountered issues where his PC would ask to choose an OS to boot into which was strange as I only installed windows 11 into it. From there it began to not detect any bootable devices.

    I go to check it out and enounter the same issues, even after changing the boot priority (the only storage, a HDD, was still showing in the BIOS). I am unable to even boot into an Ubuntu image on a USB (crashes when it does a "file check" or something to that effect).

    Suspecting the HDD, less than a year old, may be damaged I connect it to my rig (dumb mistake in hindsight), and I am able to view files in the hdd with no issues, several times. I assume then that the HDD is likely working and my cousin either downloaded something malicious or made a change to his system to damage it.

    I setup a windows 11 image, and connect to via usb to his system where I reinstall windows. Even after successfully "installing" windows 11, i kept getting a no bootable device error. I was finally able to boot into an Ubuntu image on a USB, and still view the HDD, so I reinstalled linux with no issues, after which i was finally able to reinstall windows 11 with no issues.

    I'm curious if this could have been a virus that cause these issues? (do any viruses cause similar issues?) If its more likely he did something wrong to the PC (he's not tech savvy) or potentially something else?

     

    Hopefully the decrease in unhoused population continues to decrease due to actual changes implemented, rather than due miscounting.

    I did the math based on the numbers presented: The article states an estimated 24 Billiion dollars spent on unhoused people since Newsome’s entry into office (2019, 6 years), with an estimated 84,000 unhoused. That means we’ve spent about 47,619 dollars per unhoused person, per year in that time.

     

    Hopefully the decrease in unhoused population continues to decrease due to actual changes implemented, rather than due miscounting.

    I did the math based on the numbers presented: The article states an estimated 24 Billiion dollars spent on unhoused people since Newsom's entry into office (2019, 6 years), with an estimated 84,000 unhoused. That means we’ve spent about 47,619 dollars per unhoused person, per year in that time.

    Edit This is a vary rough estimate, and assumes the number of unhoused was the same during all of Newsom's years in office (it for sure has not been), but it gives an idea of how much was given per person rather than just looking at the large, 24 billion dollar number.

     

    Hopefully the decrease in unhoused population continues to decrease due to actual changes implemented, rather than due miscounting.

    I did the math based on the numbers presented:
    The article states an estimated 24 Billiion dollars spent on unhoused people since Newsome's entry into office (2019, 6 years), with an estimated 84,000 unhoused. That means we've spent about 47,619 dollars per unhoused person, per year in that time.

    view more: next ›