top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 174 points 2 months ago (22 children)
  • [–] 39 points 2 months ago

    The woke left want to take away your traditional transportation! Trains are our heritage and what made our country so great! Trains burn big beautiful clean coal, some say the cleanest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    yep. learning their diction and rhetorics works wonders!
    Now Let's get these traditional means of transportation going!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    Im sorry no, fuck these fucking brain dead morons.

    I have less than 0 desire to learn their idiot vernacular to try to convince them of anything.

    Just ask them to do a simple algebra problem in their head, and then spell the word procrastinate.

    If they cannot do that, just tell them they are too stupid to make decisions, sit down, shut the fuck up, we're gonna do this other thing now, and it doesn't matter if you're too dumb to understand what that means.

    ... how many of them are closeted gays and cucks?

    They want to be dominated, so just dominate them. They only understand and respect force, so be forceful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 2 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Pushing the benefits of something and focusing on the benefits that the target audience actually care about is usually a good way to get them on board with your idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Or you can just tell the primarily fear motivated idiots to be afraid of things, and then their brains stop working, they just don't like the scary thing and want scary thing to suffer because scary thing is bad.

    You can't win an argument with an idiot; they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    Remember the whole... they go low, we go high, rhetoric?

    Assanine. Literally an in-group signalling feel good hugbox measure, doesn't actually work at all on the out group. Vanity and smugness as a strategy, a strategy that repeatedly fails in a political system that is rigged to over represent the local yokel ya'll qaeda types, and is rigged to disenfranchise the working poor and minority groups of all kinds.

    You think that you're playing an unrigged game, for some reason, maybe because thats a comforting thing to hold onto, that democracy is inevitable and rules and norms are just and eternal, because they seem nice and fair to you.

    Well guess what?

    We got 1/3 of the country that effectively gets 1/2 the voting power.

    The game isn't fair, the rules are always changing, and this 1/3 of people would and literally has willingly voted to destroy democracy itself and replace it with tyranny.

    You gotta change the rules you are willing to play by... if the real game is how you rig the apparent game, you need to think outside your comfort zone, or just admit defeat right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That is nice and all but I don't live in America. The same/similar arguments are not US specific.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Thats nice and all but the conversation you were entering was specifically about america and american politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Nothing about it was specifically american. Just because it can apply there doesn't mean it only applies there. Although I wonder how much of that is because of american politics being imported...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    Because you keep conceeding to idiot racists and petty narcissist tyrants who don't even believe in democracy whom you will never be able to meaningfully convince of anything anyway.

    I'm from these dumb fuck regressives.

    I know what I'm talking about.

    You speak to them with insults, violence and threats, just barely polite enough to not immediately incite them to assault you on the spot, otherwise, they do not listen.

    We keep losing because the 1/3rd of this country that the entire political system is rigged to over represent will always default to being dumbfuck greedy idiots.

    You can't convince them of anything consciously because they are the world grand masters at cognitive dissonance and delusion. They are too stupid to formulate a coherent worldview, you will not be able to change their worldview without making their lizard brain activate.

    You can spend 10x the effort of explaining things to them like theyre a baby, it'll stick for a day, then they'll hear a shiboleth style conservative 'joke', a cultic thought stopping cliche, and that understanding you imparted them with immediately evaporates.

    I repeat, they are literally too stupid to actually have a coherent worldview.

    The Republicans know this.

    Its why they consistently do racist/socialist/lqbtq scaremongering, and it consistently works.

    They literally have enlarged amygdalas, the fear processing center of the brain.

    They literally only truly understand fear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You can dislike them all you want but, like it or not, they get to vote the same as you. You can choose to be angry or you can meet them where they're at and have a chance to inspire the change you want to see. Your choice

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    I want to disagree with this but I can’t. Conservatives genuinely react so well to being bullied and talked down to. It’s apparently what they want 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Trust me I wish I was wrong.

    Tried for 2 decades to do the reasoning thing.

    It doesn't matter, it doesn't work.

    They don't argue in good faith, because most of them literally are not capable of arguing in good faith.

    You make them your bitch, and force or trick them to realize your way is better for both you and them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah...it's sad but if you want results, you have to play the "who has the bigger peepee" game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yep, its pretty much that stupid.

    But... if its stupid... and it works...

    ... it isn't stupid.

    Playing chess with a pigeon and getting mad that it isn't playing by the rules and then flaps over the pieces?

    You're the fool.

    Just get some bird seed and also a broom, apply positive and negative reinforcement toward the desired result.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    It's not because we stopped talking to MAGA. Rather, we keep losing partially because our establishment Democrats haven't gotten the memo abput the Republican party ceasing to engage the two-party democratic system in goid faith, rather are trying to dismantle it from within.

    There's no compromising with a literal fascist takeover.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 66 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Broke: biking is unsafe

    Woke: biking doesn't require government issued privledge

    Bespoke: Biking gives you a fat ass and chiseled calves

    :drgn_lick: 1
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm going to need a source on the fat ass part. I cycled for years when I was younger and I certainly have glutes of steel, but they're not big. I do however find myself very much attracted to a big ass on the opposite sex so if that's true in any way shape or form, I should start cycling to meet more women who cycle perhaps lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    My ass has fattened up since I started bike commuting is my only source, so grain of salt I suppose

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    Hmm perhaps I'm just not genetically predisposed to big glutes. My quads and calves are massive and my upper body is ridiculous, but neither cycling nor squats ever gave me a big ass lol

    My ex once got a fracture in her forearm trying to spank it though, that's what I mean by glutes of steel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    Another major bonus is the fact that it only takes about a weekend of study to learn how to maintain and repair 99% of bike parts. Also, far cheaper parts. And also free bonus exercise.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    I usually look up how to maintain bits on my bike as they become necessary rather than all in one go. Same with buying tools for it.

    First get a few cleaning bits. Then a few tools to split a chain and some quick links along with the tool to connect/disconnect quick links. Tools to fix an inner tube puncture. Disc brake bleeding kit and mineral oil.

    Tempted to get a proper disc brake alignment tool, pretty cheap but last time I just cut a shim from a cider can and placed those either side of the rotor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -1 points 2 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    like, imagine buying a new bike for $15K and having other cyclists laugh at you for being so cheap

    This has never happened ever, not even once.

    Tour de France-level bikes cost $15k. You quite literally cannot spend more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Cyclists think it's cool that I got mine from a co-op that fixes up old bikes. Yeah there are douchebags in cycling, like any other hobby. But you also got plenty of DIY punk types and folks who just enjoy their time on two wheels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    While my bike was 300 and I like to say that anything above 500 is too much; I do have acquaitance with a man with a 1500€ bike that has acquaintance with a person with a 30k€ bike Dx

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Don't know about too much, but more than necessary perhaps. Mine was £600, probably didn't need to go that expensive but I use it a lot so its hardly a bad choice either.

    Then again, got over £200 in accessories with just the ortlieb XL pannier bags. I cycle to work every day, so arguably its pretty easy to justify spending a fair bit. If I took the bus that would cost over £1k a year. So even that €1.5k bike is fairly easy to justify compared to bus prices if you want a decent bike.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I meant more in the sense of how much the price increase of bikes doesn't match the quality increase proportionally. I'm very roughly estimating where biking instead of any motorisation is what I generally commend in any case, even the money save thanks to it aside

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    Disc brakes aren't fancy any more, or insanely expensive -- and they can be way easier to work on than truing a wheel perfectly to get your rim brakes working just right.

    Maybe I've been lucky but only once did i need to get my brake lines bled. Otherwise, just replace the pads when they wear out, and the thing is self-adjusting.

    Miss me with that electronic shifting though. We're not airplanes. We don't need fly by wire.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Electric shifting has pretty much 0 maintenance these days, there are no adjustments on the electric derailleurs that bolt on to the frame. Charging it once a month is mildly annoying though and I wish they put bigger density batteries in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Either that, or make it easier to just hook up whenever I park my bike, or some kind of alarm when it's under 20% or something. Because what happens is that I grab my bike, leave home, shift three times, and then when i'm too far out, find that it's actually empty.

    My regular city bike has manual hub gears, which I have maintained once in 25 years, and they're fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    Car[...]Requires regular inspection

    Not in most areas, unfortunately

    image

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    For a long time Vermont allowed people living out-of-state to register their vehicles in Vermont and get a VT license plate. They do require inspections but if you were out of state and never actually went to Vermont, the inspection requirement was irrelevant. This was often used by the skoolie (school bus converted to motorhome) community to get a bus registered and legal before it was converted to a motorhome (at which point you can register it normally in most states). And it was used generally by people with shitty old cars that couldn't pass an inspection and didn't have a valid title. However, they closed this loophole three years ago and now you can't newly register an out-of-state vehicle there any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

    I live in an emissions check only state. My car is an EV and I admit I take enjoyment in knowing ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) car drivers have an inconvenience that I do not.

    That said, I'd rather we had regular mandatory inspections. Cars are already dangerous. We should be productively trying to catch issues that could suddenly cause them to behave unexpectedly.

    Funny

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I mean good to make cars less dangerous but doesn't this disproportionately hurt the poor? Like well off people have newer cars, and can afford to fix any code violations, but broke people are just trying to get to work. If I had lost my janky car when I was just starting out, I wouldn't have been able to ever save up for a nicer safer car. Now I'm broke as fuck again and I hope my car would pass but it's getting older.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Ummm... "Periodic emissions inspection"? How would that work for a bicycle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    basically cops can stop you, find something wrong, and ticket you. Biking isn't a right. Grays can also have their own auth rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Okay a funny, where I went to high school, a kid got pulled over for biking too fast. He was going like 20+, had nice road bike and strong legs, in a school zone. He didn't get a ticket but it was funny.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    School zones are like 25mph aren't they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Slower. At least the ones where they care are signed slower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I think typically it's between 15-25 mph. But honestly, in my area, people don't even follow that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    Yup, where I am e-mopeds are a hazard more than the ebike riders. Fat tire e-bike riders aren't around as much as they used to be because I'm guessing they figured out they're not easy to pedal if the battery dies.

    The scooters are around they're chill.

    The e-mopeds riders I've seen are all impatient and go full throttle on the trail.

    It's 15mph on the trail. Usually 5mph on the turns.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago* (16 children)

    Most places i feel you can get away with riding drunk. Not swervey drunk, but more intoxicated than you should drive in a car. I don't feel cops really care too much for drunk cyclists.

    I mention this, because some people drive drunk in a 2 ton vehicle capable for killing or maiming others. Those same drivers on a bicycle would be better (though there's still a chance for injury and death, more of that risk is to the rider than others)

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I personally know more people who've gotten somewhat badly injured biking drunk (clipless pedals...) than who have hurt themselves or others driving... (1 vs 0)

    Actually now that i think about it, the car accident people i know are dead, that's why i didn't remember... (2 fatalities that i can think of, not sure if alcohol was even involved).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    People should have a right to endanger themselves but not others

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Agreed. Most people think that biking drunk is harmless, and it mostly is. My friend got badly hurt but she's still alive; and that was part of her turning her life around. Unlike the people i know who were killed by cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Depends how much. Gone on a bike after a couple of pints before but I wouldn't after a proper drinking session.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Even then, another bonus with biking vs drinking and driving, you can get off your bike and walk home with your bike. With cars you can't do the same, and, at least in my area, there a lot of times you can leave your car overnight at places. So there's a huge incentive to drive it or pay for a ticket (which of course, pay the ticket over a DUI, but still).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    clipless pedals

    There’s your problem. Those things are useless and just increase the chance of falling over.

    Turns out 99% of the force is on the downstroke anyway and clipless pedals don’t matter. I will die on this hill, I’ve read the studies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    My friends are mountain bikers.

    The utility of attaching your feet to the pedals, either with clipless, or flats with the long pegs, is so your feet don't fly off in rock gardens. Having a strong stance is more important, but clipless helps. It also helps doing bunny hops and things.

    The kind of pedal and shoe you use is a personal preference.

    That said, she wouldn't have been hurt as bad if she had been riding normal pedals

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    In the Netherlands, it's technically illegal to ride a bike while drunk (or operate any other vehicle). But they pretty much never test or ticket anyone, because if people start getting tickets for cycling drunk, they're just going to drive instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Florida used to use these sort of overturned metal soup bowl things as turning lane dividers. It was a way of giving a tactile warning to drivers of lane departures without damaging the cars. It was also a way of landing drunks riding their bikes at night flat on their fucking faces. You can guess how I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    In Austria i'm pretty sure you can lose your drivers license for cycling drunk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Same in the UK apparently. Don't need a drivers license for my bike so go ahead and take it I guess?

    I remember at school they used it as a threat before, the fact that we could get points on our license before we even had one for stuff on a bike. I laughed in too poor to learn to drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Actually, bikes really are far left and a tool for liberty. They were especially significant in the US movements for feminism and women's suffrage, as bicycles allowed women to scootle around on their own, where before they were restricted by access to horses and male escort. (Yes, I used the verb to scootle.)

    Also bicycles encouraged women's fashion to allow for pants, which were utilitarian for bicycling sooner than they were for equestrian riding.

    (Bicycles also encouraged the paving of roads before automobiles dominated them.)

    Many opponents to women's suffrage (to women's rights and women's autonomy) also opposed bicycles. Including the Roman Catholic Church. The Holy See asserted that bicycles, especially tandem bikes, were an instrument of the devil.

    So bikes are Satan-approved!

    Some recent useful videos (on YouTube):
    Rebecca Watson's take after SoT Sean Duffy decided bike lanes are woke
    The Bicycle Episode of Climate Town with help from Not Just Bikes

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Except you can't kill people nor highlight your need to compensate for something with a bike

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    33 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post