Not long ago, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani was demonized by leaders of both political parties. On Thursday night, the 34-year-old democratic socialist was celebrated as a political force, the face of the region’s sports renaissance, even the leader of “Mamdanistan.”

In a rally with Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., that drew thousands to a Brooklyn theater, the emboldened mayor delivered a fiery message to Democratic leaders in Washington — and even those considering 2028 presidential bids — as he worked to elevate a slate of likeminded candidates in Tuesday’s New York primaries.

“People often ask me what I think of the state of the Democratic Party. This slate here today is our answer,” Mamdani declared. “The Democratic Party must change.”

“The party of the past will not be what leads us into the future. We need a Democratic Party with backbone.”

He shared the stage with three congressional candidates, including two running against Democratic incumbents. All three identify, or have identified, as democratic socialists. They promised to “abolish ICE,” condemned the “genocide” in Israel and vowed to “tax the rich” if elected.

...

Mamdani endorsed political organizer Darializa Avila Chevalier over Rep. Adriano Espaillat, the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, in New York’s 13th District, which includes parts of upper Manhattan and the Bronx.

Mamdani is also backing former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who is running against incumbent Rep. Dan Goldman in New York’s 10th District. And in New York’s 7th, he’s supporting democratic socialist state Assembly Member Claire Valdez against outgoing Rep. Nydia Velazquez’s handpicked successor.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20260620173014/https://wtop.com/national/2026/06/mamdani-tests-his-political-clout-in-new-yorks-primary-as-he-looks-to-reshape-the-democratic-party/

all 55 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

[The Democratic Party] has seen its job as explaining why we cannot instead of showing how we can

This is a quote from the speech that I got from a different article, but here is the entire problem in a nutshell. The Democratic Party always has excuses, even when they have total control of government. Fucking losers.

We've been through Clinton, Obama, and Biden, and not one of them tried to give us a decent health care plan. Obama came closest, but that was a REPUBLICAN plan, and it sucked. The only time they tried to throw us a bone, and it was a Republican bone.

After the Midterms, there better be a new attitude at the DNC, or they're all going to the guillotines, too. They don't have to worry though, we'll do the MAGAs first.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    there was one good component of the healthcare law they offered: if you offer healthcare insurance, you have to offer the same plans at the same price to everyone. I used to have to pay COBRA pricing just to get insurance. it's slightly higher than paying annual premiums every month. one of the joys of being extraordinarily disabled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Democrats always pull the it's time to come together card when they get into power.

    I used to naively think that is because they wanted to be adults and lead by example, but I've come to realize they do it because they are paid by the same donor class that doesn't want them to push populist ideas.

    They'll throw us bones from time to time like literarily just letting gays get equal rights, but actually fighting for the working class, they almost never do.

    We need to get rid of corporate Democrats, fuck they are basically Republicans from 2005, and replace them with leftist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago

    As far as I can tell, American politics can only be fixed by the supreme court. You need to flood it with justices who are willing to rule that campaign donations from corporations are not free speech. And then, to rule that the very concept of democracy is incompatible with campaign contributions from corporations and other organizations like PACs. And by that logic, contributions coming from anywhere except registered voter constituents is fundamentally unconstitutional.

    Congress under the existing rules will never pass a campaign contribution law because the owners of our congresspeople don't want those laws passed. We will never elect enough people to congress who are not financially backed by large organizations. We're stuck as a country. And I think only SCOTUS has any possibility of fixing it.

    But if SCOTUS did fix it, I think few in Congress would have a problem with it. They personally seek power, so this would actually give them more power. The problem is that if they seriously support campaign finance reform today, most of those would lose their next election and lose all of their power.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (26 children)
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Democratic Socialists of America. They're a radlib progressive organization that supports progressive democrats

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    A cursory glance says that this is radical in the idea that infrastructure should be owned by the people instead of sold to them at the highest cost they can afford. This does not appear to be an org that uses threats and violence to persuade people.

    So, radical like different, not radical like guns and bombs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Radlib is a term for someone who holds socially progressive views and adopts leftist and radical esthetics, but supports free market capitalism. The picture I have in my head is someone wearing a pussy hat and blue hair celebrating Meloni was elected because she's a woman. Is this how you mean it?

    EDIT: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/radlib If you disagree with me and have a wiktionary account, you might want to edit this page.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] -17 points 4 months ago* (14 children)

    DSA has a hundred thousand members which is about 0.0333% of the US population.

    A snowball has a higher chance of surviving in hell then that party becoming relevant in the next hundred years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago

    They're already relevant. That party of a hundred thousand has become a household name among the Democratic voting base because of the insurgent campaigns they've been running and winning against the DNC establishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    All you're saying is that they should get even more support than they currently have because despite being small they've had a noticeable (and good) impact on American politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    No what I’m saying is we should concentrate on the DNC like how MAGA took over the republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Why the fuck do you think they're endorsing candidates in DNC primaries, genius? They're literally doing exactly what you suggest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    The comment above clearly disagrees with you so maybe try reading comments before you start calling my intelligence into question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Nah, fuck the DNC. The current failures of the democratic party are specifically because of the DNC. They're more interested in serving corporations than the people who vote for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is why leftists will never be a political bloc with any power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    It’s probably because the party that’s supposed to be left of center isn’t actually left of center, and they take their campaign funds from the same donor class as the fascists?

    You can still vote blue in general elections, but don’t settle for scraps in the primaries. The DSA is starting to gain traction from the ground up. This is what we need.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    DSA has a hundred thousand members which is about 0.0333% of the US population.

    Membership was only ~6,000 members in 2015 compared ~100,000 now. Almost all of that gained in recently direct response to Donald Trump. But you can dismiss a massive and sudden grassroots change if you want. That's what the DNC has done for the last 30+ years to instead just do whatever their donors want, and dangle various social issues as their sole differentiator, unless those conflict with corporate donors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    the democrat party is made of many subgroups that people affiliate with officially and unofficially. that ~100k is definitely underrepresented. of any accepted group, the DSA represents my interests the best. I ain't never seen any enrollment paperwork for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I mean even if you factor in a seriously alarming number of Americans being braindead stupid, if you lose to a felon rapist pedophile, you have to acknowledge your party needs to change and adapt.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    They promised to “abolish ICE,” condemned the “genocide” in Israel and vowed to “tax the rich” if elected.

    I mean... The DNC already do two of those things regularly and already beat the GOP on the other, but uh...

    Why didn't he say all this before the primaries were held in most states? Or after the General Elections?

    EDIT: Because this is specifically about the NYC election and not any broader "democratic leadership" which is weird because Mamdani is among the ranks of democratic leadership in NYC.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Why didn't he say all this before the primaries were held in most states? Or after the General Elections?

    Because you have to build political capital before you can spend it. If he had said it in December, corporatist Dems would've been able to use the excuse "why should we care what he has to say? All he did was get elected; he hasn't done anything yet."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -37 points 4 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Uh, most Americans are in favor of abolishing ICE. By your pure popularism political philosophy you're now on board too, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    Setting aside that you're just pretending your poll is right and mine is wrong, what do you think this poll says that supports "people won't support abolish"? Because giving a third option with reforms doesn't change that outright abolish is more popular than not. It's not an electoral loser. Especially in the demographics that vote for Democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    So having been just wrong about whether abolish was a minority position and claiming Mamdani can't represent the Democratic party, now you've moved the goalposts to "the person who represents the Democratic party, should appeal to Republicans".

    If only we'd had multiple examples of mealy-mouthed centrists losing to an extremist representing his party's base. Maybe being successful at politics isn't actually about trying to tack as hard to the center as possible with watered down positions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (3 children)

    This thread literally started with demonstrating that "abolish ICE" is the preferred choice over "keep ICE the same". And that includes among independents. It's not an issue that turns off voters. The whole theory that triangulating centrism that says nothing so as to never turn off a voter had failed. Multiple times now. Your theory of politics is wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    JFC, "Jonathan Cowan, president and co-founder of the centrist think tank Third Way". Paid advocate for centrism argues for centrism, and lies in the process. Democrats didn't coalesce around Defund, and Defund never had majority support. And you disingenuously quote him as expertise.

    Even in the face of conservatives forming the fucking gestapo, with polls backing it up, you mealy mouthed losers can't scrounge up a principle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    ICE wasn't laying siege to cities with the budget of a military and murdering Americans then. That's why there's majority approval for abolishing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Because that's a fantasy. The people in ICE are in it because they want to be doing this shit and are overjoyed they can be doing it in this way. Neither of the murderers were new to the organization. All the training and imagined culture of professional government service didn't stop them from walking American streets with faces covered and then shooting American citizens. No one that participated in that can ever be trusted with authority ever again. Many of them should be imprisoned. You can't reform the gestapo.

    Why are you so precious about an agency younger than most voters?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    The DNC had effectively cut all funding for the ICE and related departments from February until last week when a GOP-only reconciliation bill changed that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)