[–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

Let me preface this by saying that I personally would love to clean house at the Supreme Court and prosecutions are long overdue.

With that out of the way, comments like yours make me wonder if it’s bots posting them or if you really do spend that much time on leftist social media. The notion that the progressive left has enough support where anything remotely like a Supreme Court impeachment would happen is delusional. Even if Dems held the majority in the House and 2/3 of the Senate needed to make that happen, the idea that they would be progressive enough to make that happen is crazy.

Not only is it obvious that this country is just as centrist and right leaning as it ever was if you actually go outside, but it’s never been done. There has been one Supreme Court impeachment ever, over 200 years ago, and the Senate failed to convict.

These kinds of comments always increase in frequency around elections. So I’m led to wonder…how much of it is strategic interference to suppress left vote by pushing the narrative that the “blue wave” is big enough without them? How much of it is real people who live in echo chambers? And are those the same people who sat around because there was no way Trump would win in 2016 and 2024?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Why should it be? It shouldn’t.

    Why is it? Because the dude who brought you a cheeseburger makes a fraction of the hourly wage of the curb dude, and you chose to participate in the broken system by going to that restaurant.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    My thought was XFCE feels a lot like XP/7 era Windows, and so would be familiar. But I can see Budgie being attractive for someone where it’s just like “here’s the button for your email, here’s how you get on the internet” and they don’t need to touch anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I know this isn’t the issue, and I am fully in favor of expanding social safety nets including food stamps, not reducing them…

    That said, I find no conceptual issue with limiting the kinds of items food stamps can be used for to actual food. No one needs soda or candy bars or whatever other processed, practically poisonous crap we eat. We’d all be better off if we didn’t. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to limit tax-dollar funded food assistance programs to actual food items.

    If you disagree, tell me why.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    The population of the Chicago metro area (excluding the 2 WI and 2 IN counties that get lumped in) accounts for 66% of the population of the state.

    The combined population of the Houston, Dallas, and Austin metro areas only account for 58% of the population of the state.

    Not only that, most of Chicagoland is blue, but you cannot say the same for Texas cities where most of the outlying suburbs of the metro area are red.

    The population of Houston proper, Dallas proper, and Austin proper combined only make up 15% of the population of Texas. But Chicago proper alone makes up over 21% of the population of Illinois. Throw in Aurora and Naperville to make the 3 city comparison a little more fair, and you get almost 26% of the population of IL.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    That’s not a Trump original. I’m sure it’s been said before that, but it’s a line from The West Wing. The president’s chief of staff makes the comment “To sweep all fifty states, the president would only need to do two things: blow the Sultan's brains out in Times Square, then walk across the street to Nathan's and buy a hot dog.”

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›