top 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 169 points 4 months ago (19 children)

Was there ever a MS Teams feature anyone actually liked? Seems like the whole product is based on loathing.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Teams isn't made for the users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I can't for the life of me figure out who it is for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Features Microsoft wants to push and features companies want. It's widely used because IT departments can just buy Office 365 and have all of the office apps and support for however they're hosting the rest of their office 365 apps but that doesn't mean it's good

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    They recently cribbed the Catch Up feature directly from Slack. I’m a big fan of that. Come up with a good feature on their own? Nah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    Good to remember that the client for Teams isn't you - it's your IT department

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Lol, are you kidding? IT gets to experience the suck of using it, and of administrating it. For as bad as the front end of Microsoft stuff is, the back end is usually worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Wtf are you on about administering teams is braindead

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's one of the better ones, and basic functionality is braindead, but I've definitely found some pain points.

    • My work requires us to use company branded video chat backgrounds 🤮. Whatever way my co-worker deployed them, they aren't available through the mobile app.
    • There's a feature to create unified groups (Teams groups) with membership lists hidden from non-members. It is only available through PowerShell.
    • Got users that want to use their group like a distribution list? They all have to personally choose to subscribe to incoming email. You can set the group to auto-subscribe new members, but subscribing existing members requires some basic PowerShell fuckery.
    • Sharepoint backend for file sharing. Less said about that shit the better.
    • If a user's display name updates, how it syncs to different places that display their name in Teams and how long that takes is inconsistent as all hell.
    • Better hope you never get a ticket from your legal team to pull chat history. Pain in the ass to do, horrid fucking output format.
    • No way I've found to disable the damn upsell "Get Premium" button. Granted I haven't checked in a while.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Valid complaints but its why IT teams have to fight these random ass requirements because its a trivial small seeming suggestion but takes so much time, generates so many issues. Of course that only works if your company is structured in a way where they respect ITs input.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Hmm...

    Image generated with Microsoft Copilot

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status

    Considering how much I have to manually fix my regular teams status, I have doubts as to how effective this will be.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    It would be very useful me to know if a colleague is in the office or not without the need to message them and wait for answer.

    But yes, I have to fix my status roughly once per day, so I have doubt this feature will work properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    It would be very useful me to know if a colleague is in the office or not without the need to message them and wait for answer.

    But if you know they're in the office, aren't you then going to message them and wait for an answer?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 4 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Many also do not care, unfortunately.

    Let's not get that Lemmy echo chamber vibe where a few dozen of us agree that millions of Windows users don't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, the vast majority of people barely even know how to use a web browser. They won’t care about (or even notice) this change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It's not like people have a choice lol what are you going to do find a company using slack

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    You definitely could.

    You could also ask your IT folks to switch. If enough of them ask, they might.

    If you're the IT folks, the question is forwarded to leadership. If enough of you ask, they might.

    inb4 cynical/bad faith angle of "Leadership literally never listens to anyone under them ever."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Many also do not care, unfortunately.

    Meh. It's a work thing and corporate bobbleheads say I need to use it. Then they'll pay for me to wait for their mandated things to start/connect/work/do whatever. It's mostly usable enough to get my shit done, it randomly shows whatever status on my account which I couldn't care less. And the moment I log off I don't care if the place is literally on fire.

    It's after all just work and nothing more. There are way more important things in life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    My company device already has so much surveillance on it that this won't make a meaningful difference to me.

    However, given that they can't even get my activity status right, I don't see it going well. For example It sets me we idle even if I'm typing furiously in my editor, unless I go wave my mouse cursor in Teams for a few seconds. Other chat apps got this right decades ago.

    It doesn't deliver messages or delivers them out of order. Unread status on messages doesn't work right. It crashes randomly. I could go on.

    Fix the core functionality, Microsoft, instead of adding all kinds of big brother bullshit. I don't trust Teams to get anything right and neither should my manager.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    Even better when you have multiple machines logged in.

    I am simultaneously presenting in a call and magically away from my desk, soon to be while working remotely and sitting at a desk in the office.

    Fucking idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    The activity issue finally just made me set to appear offline. I was irrationally paranoid that my manager or skip would see me away most of the time and think that I wasn't showing up for work, even though I was sitting there typing away.

    The worst part is that even if I set my status in the status bar to "available" once I noticed it was away, it sometimes would just set itself back to away instantly. Opening up teams and clicking in the window seems to be the only way to get that to not happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you.

    They're not even trying with these weak ass justifications anymore. Are either of these things an actual problem for anyone?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    "Hey are you in the office" works well, too.

    But IME if I am, they are just lining up at my door anyway and I can't focus on actual work. At least when I WFH, I can ignore "hey you got a sec?" until I actually do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    My status is permanently set to Away so that people don't bother me with stupid questions like "are you in the office", although for some reason teams randomly resets my status to green every couple of weeks until I notice the increase in stupid questions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I look forward to everyone being shown as located in the major city where our VPN is listed instead of where we actually are. That's how it works for browsers and other location based functionality now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    “Users may hate”

    Sweety, we already hate everything MS. Take a wild guess…

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Management on the other hand ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Am management. Still hate it. Costs a fucking fortune, sprawls beyond any reasonable control, fucking impossible to secure, every product has its own operating model and support, it changes every month, and the notion of leaving it is absurd. It is a disease that everyone is infected with and their sales people will never let you go. Also, it's not like I can log into a central portal and see my employees on a map or something. I can't see their searches, their teams chats, nothing really. Maybe HR could if they weren't in the parking lot eating old cigarette butts or whatever it is they do.

    Its like herpes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Yep, not to mention it's a basic messaging program, but it regularly uses 1-2gb of ram on a lot of machines at my workplace. Had a coworker vibe code a lightweight version (terminal based), he pretty easily got it down to 80ish mb, and it mostly worked (the whole thing was mostly for shits and giggles, but surprisingly usable).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office.

    Joke's on you. My work is so stingy, they don't offer WiFi to employees. Also, I've blocked location permissions in Teams, just in case.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    If it's a new Teams feature I'm going to hate it regardless of what it does. MS doesn't make software for human beings any more.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    I was at Shiny Night at one of the local Seattle furry bars a little while back and wound up hanging out with a bunch of folks in really well articulated fursuits talking shop. Eventually, as it does with any group of devs, the topic drifted to the classic game of "who hates Teams the most" and unfortunately it turned out the people I was drinking with:

    1- Were mostly M$ developers working on Teams doing their 'team bonding' polycule thing.
    2- Hate teams more than I could possibly ever manage. I mean, you think you hate teams? You think it's unmanagable, insecure, convoluted and a pain in the ass for your IT crew? Imagine what the backend for that disaster must look like, then make that your entire day job. My god, it was a level of vitriol matched only by discussing Deutsche Bhan with a group of drunk Germans...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago

    Location: at work.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    wasnt it only yesterday that Gremlin Satya Nutella was telling employees they should not be tracking their staff?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Is it possible to hate Teams more?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Since teams is for connecting people remotely (office to office, office to other departments, etc) what sense does this make?

    Being "in office" has nothing to do with my location.

    Microsoft sucks so much.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Easier to control if your employee is actually at the office instead of working from home.
    It's not like the pandemic proved most office jobs could actually be done remotely...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    We have teams. It sucks. They’re going to make us use it for phone calls soon.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    The phone calls part is one of the better parts at least for me) for Teams. It has it's own number, works on all the devices, can forward, and works well. I don't want to carry a work phone, and don't want a desk phone in the office (even though we have ones that connect to Teams). If there is a better solution that's 'cheaper' all for it, but seems pretty sold.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    My issue with it is people using their computers for calls; we have cheap ass dell laptops and there are always echoes and lags in the audio. When they finally set us up, I’m going to make sure all my calls are routed to my cell phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Seems like malicious compliance would be using the shitty service and giving them the shitty quality connection they asked for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Complete opposite experience for my office. Calls drop randomly, consultative transfers don’t work, holds don’t always reconnect. Had none of these issues when we had Skype for Business. Even had a VoIP consultant firm come in to review our issues, they couldn’t fix them.

    I was fine with teams when we only used it for meetings, team chats, and IM.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    im sure there ar eother ways of tracking thier progress, like thier work/projects done on a deadline. its more or less a control issue.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Around here employers gets to pay trillions if they even put themselves in the position of snooping on employee data , like location, without a distinct need for each individual they snoop on.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Users as in (office) workers. I cast a enormous doubt that there is no living person who chose Teams over literally any other messaging app just to use it for their main way of communication outside of their workspace.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I am curious, because the Teams hate is pretty substantial here, what are the reasons you hate Teams. I feel besides it's Microsoft (!) and it is a resource hugger plus why tf do I need a second app telling me I have a meeting besides the main one (outlook) it's okayish? Maybe because I was never allowed to try alternatives? Please, tell me

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Because Microsoft, and just the constant little BS problems I'm always having with it. Which are probably a result of being subjected to Microsofts shit QA processes. They're always changing shit with it while the problems that have been there for years keep occurring. Also my work decided we don't need actual desk phones because Teams calls work just as well (they don't).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I don't think I hate teams for the same reason as most on this site. My gripe is the stability issues. Just at my department alone there are 20 different issues per teams. Some range from buttons working after a few presses to teams just bsod the device. On my laptop teams has a memory leak and which is persistent. I have to clear teams every week or it will not even start up anymore

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Please don't come to GCCH.

    Please don't come to GCCH.

    Please don't come to GCCH.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I am logged in through vpn and use the web version. Microslop sucks

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not

    So just don't enable it then.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Hopefully this change will get rid of some scammers who use teams to recruit for fake jobs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    If possible: grab a router and install OpenWRT onto it, and turn it into a wireless bridge. Use the router to connect to the office WiFi, and have a wired connection to your laptop. Turn off the laptop’s wifi for good measure.

    Alternatively, if work provides hard lines, bring your own router and turn off WiFi to provide a protected hardline.

    There are many ways to prevent the computer from realizing what network you are on.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    grab a router and install OpenWRT onto it, and turn it into a wireless bridge. Use the router to connect to the office WiFi, and have a wired connection to your laptop

    A setup like that would trip our IT security. I actually killed all the phones on our floor by doing a simple packet route they didn't recognize, they have the routers set to kill all the PoE and block all data when anything they don't recognize comes through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    You have a network for employee’s personal phones and devices, correct? That still leads to the Internet, correct?

    I mean, the entire point of such a network is to keep outside devices off of internal networks that have sensitive data. And because the insides of large buildings can be absolutely sucky at receiving LTE/5G data connections, employees can and will do anything needed to ensure they still have connectivity on personal devices. So just connect the router/bridge to that network, and Teams will be appropriately sanitized and think you are still at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Teams will be appropriately sanitized and think you are still at home.

    I wouldn't count on that in our IT environment. The one constant there is: change. Whatever works one week, they'll screw around with it and make it different the week after that... I WFH and mostly on my own gear because getting things done with their supplied laptop is 50% fighting their ever-shifting "support."

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›