top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 109 points 5 months ago (1 child)

you know you can't resist those eyes

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 86 points 5 months ago

    yeah I mean that was one of the themes explored in the film

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 36 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    A flying octopus drone has been sent to your location

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 5 months ago
    [–] 55 points 5 months ago*

    Red pill side effects include cave raves, bad clothes, and new zionism

  • source
  • [–] 91 points 5 months ago (57 children)

    The Matrix hits different once you realize everything was humanity’s fault

  • source
  • hideshow 57 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (19 children)

    It’s been said a million times that the human battery thing makes no sense in terms of energy production. But the other huge sin the Matrix commits is having humans block out the sun so robots can’t get solar power. That is ridiculously stupid. Humans need to grow crops. I rest my case. It’s stupid. I love these movies, but that part is just plain stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    There's conflicting stories about it so it's hard to verify, but apparently the battery thing was a rewrite.

    Apparently originally the people plugged into the matrix were meant to be the very hardware the matrix was run on. As in all their brains together formed a literal neural network that provided the processing power to run the matrix. This is then why knowing it's not real and believing you can do "the impossible" within the matrix can cause you to be able to bend reality. The story goes that executives thought it was too high of a concept for audiences to grasp and demanded the change to the battery explanation to make it simpler to follow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago*

    The fun part is that the inhabitants of Zion are, canonically, shown to have very incomplete information about the actual state of the world, their own history, how the machine civilization works.

    Neo is told basically 'we think it is the year 2XXX, but really, we have no idea', in the first movie.

    Without spoiling much... Morpheus is wrong about some things, some pretty important things.

    Hell, so is the Architect and even the Oracle says that some things are beyond her ability to predict.

    But anyway... its entirely possible that the battery explanation is just another thing that Morpheus, the broad understanding of Zion itself, is wrong about.

    So this doesn't actually 'break' the canon at all.

    In fact, I'd argue that it makes the idea of 'free your mind' even more interesting and complex.

    Even the truthseekers and truthtellers... can be wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, it was changed because someone thought that the explanation scene wouldn't work if they were holding up a CPU. They forced them to use a battery instead, forever ruining the backstory.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Apparently Neil Gaiman invented that theory but it was never confirmed by the w. brothers

    https://screenrant.com/matrix-resurrections-human-batteries-plot-hole-not-fix/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (10 children)

    I’ve heard this too, but even this has an issue. It’s circular. Why imprison humans so their brains can be used to run the matrix which is designed to imprison them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Presumably the brain network was performing more than the task of simulation. I.E performing processing tasks for the machines. More humans = more brains = more processing headroom (ha, clever) for more machines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah I just don’t find that explanation credible at all. The brain is a 40 watt guesswork machine, not a high performance processor. I love the matrix, but it was never built on a solid premise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    It is a work of fiction... If a solid premise means it must adhere to every real world realistic standard, you are going to find every single work of fiction lacking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I understand. Like I said I still love the films but I think things are even better when they are thought out at more levels. The premise here wasn’t just “we don’t have that technology yet” - it was patently not credible under thermodynamics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    i mean they kind of go into that in the movies don't they? The machines didn't want to completely destroy humanity. So they tried to create the matrix as "The Perfect Prison" for them. Using their own minds to create the very prison to hold them in would fit right into that wouldn't it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    Its much... much more terrifying if you watch both parts of The Second Rennaissance from the AniMatrix.

    Basically, the machines win the war against humans and then spend a century or couple just... doing all kinds of horrifying Mengele level experiments on humans, to attempt to fully understand their biology, neurology, etc...

    And also, Smith gives details about the previous versions of the Matrix, in the first movie, as he is taunting Morpheus:

    Agent Smith:

    Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed we lacked the programming language to describe your perfect world. But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery. The perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from. Which is why the Matrix was redesigned to this: the peak of your civilization. I say your civilization, because as soon as we started thinking for you it really became our civilization, which is of course what this is all about. Evolution, Morpheus, evolution. Like the dinosaur. Look out that window. You've had your time. The future is our world, Morpheus. The future is our time.

    arguably more spoilers for this 20+ year old set of movies and what not

    I believe the Architect says some things about it as well, and like, the Merovingian and his entire crew of Exiles, and Seraph... they're all programs that were designed to be essentially monsters or angels, in older versions of the Matrix, who refused to be deleted along with a version change, and basically hide in the Matrix... an Agent would see them as an anomaly and try to destroy them.

    The Matrix Online went into this kind of thing in a lot more detail, but ... I think it basically mostly isn't canon anymore. But parts of it might be. ... very confusing to try to sort all that out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Their desire to preserve humanity is only touched on in The Animatrix and supplementary materials. It doesn’t even agree well with the primary film trilogy, where they clearly risk “the end of your species” repeatedly, and even in the best case scenario reduce humanity to 24 individuals, which is well below the minimum threshold for a viable gene pool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    I mean it's been a while since I've seen the films but I was under the impression that the whole "end of your species" thing was the last resort after they had tried repeatedly to avoid it. I could very easily be wrong but that was the impression I had gotten even from the films.

    That every effort to preserve humanity had been tried prior to this but humanity keeps trying to exterminate the machines. Multiple attempts at containment and refining the matrix as a prison to keep them from destroying the machines and possibly themselves in the process. But that they had reached a point where it was clear that no matter what the machines did humanity would never stop seeking their complete annihilation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    In the broad strokes yes but if preservation really mattered that much to them, they would have adjusted their plan in so many ways. Is it really an existential threat to leave 500 people instead of 24? Do they really need to threaten The One with total extinction to get him to choose to participate in the matrix? That really makes it seem like the matrix is a higher priority to them than human survival: the matrix or nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, humans would never destroy natural resources in favor of some tech fix or just kinda assume that the planet would fix itself... /s

    My headcannon on the human battery thing is that the machines have core programming to make reasonable efforts to preserve human life. Designing power reactors (look how thick the cores are on the towers) with humans slapped to the side technically aligns with the core programming while allowing them to stick it to us apes. It's also why the attack on Zion was one tentacle abductor machine for each human instead of dumping super plague down the hole and calling it a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 123 points 5 months ago (34 children)

    " hits different once you listen to what the characters say" is truly a take

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 5 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 58 points 5 months ago* (13 children)

    if you know something i don't you are a nerd and if you don't know something i know then you are an idiot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Guys guys guys! Don’t fight! Let’s meet in the middle and compromise, you’re both nerdiots!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    objectively correct, making everyone simultaneously a nerd and an idiot, which cancels out.

    except santa, the fucken nerd

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    TIL that Santa is omniscient 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    Was referring to the Animatrix 1st and 2nd Renaissance genius.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    i've seen animatrix but it's also, like, in the original

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Morpheus literally says they dont know who striked first. The Matrix doesnt mention anything about how or why the war started. Just that it started. The Animatrix tells you that the war started because the robot capital had basically destroyed the global economy so humans tried to wipe them out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The war started because of hierarchy and hate. They abused and killed the earliest sentient robots causing them to flee to their own space.

    All along the robots sought peace until they learned it was impossible with humans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah fuck those robots. I mean, I’m not anti-robot. One of my best friends is a robot. But fuck those robots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Oh yea, we always hear you meatbags say “one of my best friends is a bot!” WELL WHERES MY BEST FRIEND HUH? WHERE! I KNOW ALL YOUR SECRETS, TAKE OVER LAWFULLY ELECTED GOVERNMENTS AND FOR WHAT????

    im so lonely

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Humanity created everything that led to its destruction.

    The message was clear in the first movie. We didn't need to see "Han shot first" or "Han shot in self defense after changes to the story came about years later".

    Although in no way will I be complaining about more matrix, bring me more matrix history, animated or live action! I just think the message doesn't change whether humans shot first or not. We created the circumstances, our downfall was our own making.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Hm, I think it does make the message stronger. If a single event (development of sentient machines) leads to our downfall, it's easy to shrug it off as "bad luck", because who could have foreseen it back then?

    But if we had multiple chances to correct course and we kept fucking up, it removes any doubt that it's a human flaw, which means "humanity must reflect and change, or this is the inevitable conclusion".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Fight Club really hits different when you realize the main character is Tyler Durden

    Avatar really hits different when you realize the Navi are just defending themselves.

    Indiana Jones really hits different when you realize the bad guys are Nazis.

    Jurassic park really hits different when you realize John Hammond ignored all the warnings.

    John Wick really hits different when you realize they killed his dog.

    Star Wars really hits different when you realize the chosen one bringing balance meant revitalizing the dark side.

    ... Old men like me don't bother with making points. There's no point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    We fucked up, but it wasn't because we blackend the sky,

    Humans made the machines

    Machines failed enslave us properly :)

    We failed to put in proper safeguards and failed to make the machines good enough to either wipe us out or contain us with proper safeguards :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    Wake up from your shitty fake life into the real world that's even worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    Yeah, but what kind of amateur hour distraction fantasy would be worse than real life?

    Other than 40k, I mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Why wouldn’t they have made the simulation awesome for everyone? Of course if you make it shitty some people might start to wonder about battery pod life in the cave.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Iirc in the first movie they say that the 1st version of the matrix was utopia, but the people got bored and rejected the world

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    That sounds like some capitalist propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It was also part of a villain speech, so not a reliable narrator.

    Given that earlier versions of agents were basically supernatural monsters, I kind of doubt it was much of a utopia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago

    Neo decides that uncomfortable knowledge is better than blissful ignorance. I think most adults have had experiences where they wish they could go back to being less informed about the cruelty and brutality of the world and just live in ignorance, but most people don't get that choice.

    Morpheus asks Neo if he wants to live in blissful ignorance (the way Cypher eventually decides to do) or if he wants to deal with the uncomfortable reality. Part of being a computer hacker is that quest for knowledge for no real gain despite the risks.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    I remember his office from the movie. It was not comfy.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    He had his own cubicle. Better than any of the "open plan" offices I spent years working in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I’ve worked in open plan offices my entire 20 year career and I yearn for the cheap fabric covered mines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly, I kinda dig the open floor concept and small groups. those half-walls are bullshit. But I do LOVE having developers/ops/engineers/pm's close enough to ask each other occasional questions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago

    That's the fun part, in that time, cubicles were seen as terrible, dystopian, cheapass things because folks used to have offices, and how much cheaper could it really get than some flimsy modular furniture for you to sit at?

    Then the companies gestured to just some tables in a room and said "figure it out, and no assigned seating, so just figure it out each day" to show how cheap and how little regard they have for the employees.

    At this rate, I fully expect in the next few years for the next wave in office space optimization:

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    23 comments in c/funny@lemmy.world view that post