No, this is wrong, Linux can run on an HDD.
post
replies:
The 2GB of RAM are going to hit you harder than the HDD, if you intend to run a modern browser on it…
replies:
Linux can run off an HDD.
Hell, there are versions of Linux that are designed to be run off a USB stick.
replies:
You don't even need a HDD or SSD. You can just run from the boot media.
replies:
He's a big box store professional; in other words constantly confidently incorrect.
replies:
Linux can run on a fucking potato.
replies:
If you want to run a modern current linux distro on a laptop with only 2gb of ram and 500gb then your options are very limited, but it is possible.
For example. Void Linux with Enlightenment will work. A browser will work ok for basic websites but heavy apps like Gmail will be unusably slow.
If you have no option to upgrade, you can still use a machine with those specs to run linux apps like Abiword, Gnumeric, GIMP, etc very well.
Also, putting in any SSD drive to replace the spinning one is the single best upgrade you can make in terms of performance and longevity on an old laptop.
It can even run diskless just over the network. Like Ubuntu diskless booting.
You can run some distros from a 2gb USB stick. Not sure what these guys are talking about th.
replies:
Considering that Linux existed long before SSDs did...
I first installed Linux in 1993......
Linux barely needs a CPU.
I'm joking, but if you loaded up a lightweight distro on that it'd probably be fine
The low ram is a problem but why not just try it? Its free
No, it is not true
An SSD will improve responsiveness, but it's not strictly necessary. Linux is less HDD/SSD sensitive than Windows, but the difference is still there.
However 2GB is really pushing your limits. You'll get to desktop, but you'll struggle to get a web browser happy with that. If you want to make a headless server out of it, however, that's a perfectly fine amount.
you can actually run it on ram and not disk (see tinycore linux) and have the system faster than even an ssd
That tech has the same teacher that says Americans only shit once a week. https://startrek.website/post/39583672
There are versions of Linux that don't need any internal storage at all, eg. Puppy.
replies:
I my Raspberry PI got Linux running on an SD card. Thats not SSD either, is it?
replies:
the thing about linux is it depends what you put on it. there are lightweight distros. that being said if you can put an ssd in something do it as nothing outside of more ram when you are maxing it improves it as much as an ssd. I mean im sure if you go back far enough in cpu the drive may no longer be the bottleneck.
You don't even need an ssd or hdd. The ram will hurt more.
If you don't plan to do heavy internet browsing, an HDD is good enough for a light distro. But an SSD will definitely improve the experience.
Regarding RAM, this is a tough one. If you use the right DE + terminal app combo, 2 GB should be good.
Even windows 10 will run on 2 gig of ram and hdd.
replies:
Just download a minimal build for a distro. Include a window manager instead of a desktop environment. It will have some problems running browsers and other biggish apps but still be usable.
Linux can easily be run on your 500 MB HDD, it can also be run from an USB stick or even a DVD.
Linux can even run on the original Raspberry Pi, a single board computer with only 512 MB RAM!
You should probably look for a distro that is made for older systems, but if you do that, it should work very well. There are obviously limitations with only 2GB RAM. So I wouldn't use a resource heavy desktop like KDE/Plasma.
replies:
It'll work, but modern apps might be slow as fuck with how they call for data to be loaded from storage if you're using a hard drive. Though I kinda doubt this is a huge problem in programs other than video games.
But also: You ca run Linux from a thumb drive or CD and not even have a storage device at all in the PC.
In system requirements, windows vs any normal linux distro isn't even contest. That said, 2 gb is very little. You're gonna have to find a lightweight distro meant for old hardware.
I "inherited" my sons netbook, which had 32GB flash, because Windows plus Office wasted 27GB and then wanted to download an 8GB update. I installed Kubuntu with LibreOffice and a number of other packages I needed for the project, and was way below 5GB used.
it will work, you will just feel more pain from not having enough memory. Try something like AntiX or Puppy Linux. Not sure what you can do with 2GB nowadays though. Having more memory is more important than having a fast disk. How much is DRR2/3 for you?
Linux runs on toasters and light bulbs, literally. You can run it on whatever, depending on your use-case.
I'd recommend tinycore for this computer since it's ram is so limited
You do need some form of storage drive, like a modern m.2 or an old platter HDD, for example, because you do need to read and write somewhere.
Having said that, Linux runs on super computers and ancient potatoes, Linux prettyuch could run on anything
This depends a lot more on what you plan on doing once the OS boots. I accidentally loaded Win11 on an HDD (disk 0 was HDD, not SSD) for a few hours. It was noticeably slow, but it ran my diagnostics utilities well enough.
If you're using it for light web browsing, basic office software, etc, then it might be fine.
But something else caught my attention - you inquired about "restoring" it at shops, meaning you intend to pay money. SSD and RAM are obviously what anyone would upgrade, and you're balking at it. More to the point, you expect to run Linux, but didn't even install it as-is to test it out?
There's some missing context here. Also, 2gb laptops haven't been a thing in a very long time. You might very well get a better deal by just buying a used newer model that already has what you're looking for.
wat? Linux can almost run on a can opener.
No*
*: Distro dependent. A modern desktop distro might require slightly less than a modern build. But no matter what hardware you have, there are didtros that can run on it.
with 2gb ram, linux might work, actually. i'd go for 'lightweight distros'. but firefox has become hungry ...
The general understanding is that if you can interface a keyboard and display with a russet potato, you can boot and run Linux on it, and run stable.
Mx Linux or base arch with a lightweight desktop environment will work fine.
replies:
My main machine still runs Linux off a HDD and it's doing perfectly fine.
TL;DR : Just install try the live ISO of one of these :
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/ (click the one that says LXQt or XFCE)
https://lubuntu.me/ (this OS is specifically aimed at beginners)
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/lxqt/
Let me answer your problem.
The techinician you are relying on is presenting you with a typical use case. When you say "linux" there are several variants for different reasons. If you want to run a modern user interface like KDE or Gnome on a specialised version of linux for gaming that comes with a heavy install, like Bazzite, and do things like stream videos on your browser while having various internet tabs open, 2gb Ram might struggle, but it also might not.
There are specifically lightweight linux variants that you can use with user interfaces that are trying to be lighter. I can't find the system requirements for LXqt, but some AI will say it is 512mb of ram. Either way, if you download a live ISO , put it on a flash disk and try it out (not install it) you can see how it performs in your system without losing any data or having any problems... unless you do something funky like install it or mess around with just yanking out the USB you put the ISO onto.
Here are some official sources for versions of linux that use LXQt. I have never tried it, but I have a shitty laptop with similar specs, and I run XFCE which is a similar approach, and it does fine, even when watching videos online.
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/ (click the one that says LXQt or XFCE)
https://lubuntu.me/ (this OS is specifically aimed at beginners)
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/lxqt/
The ones I have linked you to, Debian and Fedora , are mainstream, regular, basic versions of linux that should not be overbearing. There are many, many many variants that do various things to make themselves even more efficient, and you can feel free to dig further. Ubuntu might have a bit more stuff "bundled in" to make it easier for you to get familiarised with linux. What I 100% recommend is that you try them out on "Live ISO" versions first, so you can get a feel for if you are interested in proceeding or not.
If you want more information, you can check out this video that shows variations on linux on 3 levels of hardware, and action retro shows alternative operating systems on "retro" computers, which might help you choose a version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJGf8zVt3MI
https://www.youtube.com/@ActionRetro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhL1s9kd1Fo
EDIT : My "heavy" linux is Debian with KDE. I am happy with it on 8gb ram. My "shitty" linux is LMDE (linux mint debian edition), which came with gnome, and I ripped that out and installed XFCE to make it run better. I DO NOT RECOMMEND A NEWER PERSON TRY THIS UNTIL THEY ARE READY TO LOSE ALL DATA OR REINSTALL A FRESH OS ON THAT MACHINE.
replies:
There are live distros that run directly from thumb drives.
Many distros run this way for their installer (e.G. Mint).
So it really depends on what you're trying to do.
No.
top 70 comments