top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 185 points 5 months ago (47 children)

Its working guys. The decentralization is working. I for one think its amazing that we've created these little social medias to fight like Pokémon and nobody can stop us.

  • source
  • hideshow 47 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    A wild lemmygrad appears.
    Which instance do you choose as counter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    medias

    That's already plural. It's like a hat on a hat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (32 children)

    I actually don't think the Lemmy Platform decentralization is working at all. This is evidenced by the fact that several times the tankie lemmy devs have pushed a top of the site banner to beg for donations to help run Lemmy ml, and most instance owners admit they're not equipped to audit the code and remove it.

    I think Piefed is a superior solution for that reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    let's not pretend like this is worse than the situation with reddit, this is like switching from pants filled with shit to pants that periodically piss themselves a bit

    Yeah it's not good, but good lord it's so much better

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago (19 children)

    The admins should have a choice in the banner, but each Lemmy instance is also using that software for free and should, in the spirit of Floss, give back. Thats really all I'll say about that because I'm not an admin nor am I a dev for either software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (18 children)

    Nah, fuck Tankies.

    Tankies deserve $0. Tankies should have to pay the rest of us reparations for all the propaganda they try to shove down our throats.

    Tankies would convince you and everyone in the west to murder our entire families in the night if they could. They are the enemy, they hate all that is good and just in the world, all they know is war and submission.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    ..they are the enemy, they hate all that is good and just in the world, all they know is war and submission

    I don't think even Trump supporters are that horrible people. At worst, tankies are falling for Russian/Chinese/etc... propaganda, possibly due to overcorrecting from American propaganda. None of us are immune to propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Tankies are just MAGA after their regime takes root. What the CCP does to Uighurs and Tibetans is what Trump WISHES he could do. China and Russia are constantly trying to expand borders. They're a threat to continued life on this earth, they hate us, and they're spending massive amounts of money to spread propaganda and do us as much harm as possible.

    If you want evidence of that, just look at how TikTok, a Beijing run military psyop, did everything in its power to reelect Trump in 2024 by voluntarily turning off services and blaming the Biden admin, then turning back on to thank him after the election. Trump was the Russian and Chinese backed candidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I think we might be having a misunderstanding. I thought of "tankies" as denizens of lemmy.ml and similar places, likely not even being Russian or Chinese themselves or living there.

    I'm pretty sure you are right about Chinese and Russian imperialism. However, the average person anywhere is not a knowing supporter of imperialism themselves... that's where propaganda comes into play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    The people who own and operate ML and Hexbear are the Tankies who fervently support the Russian and Chinese dictatorships, as well as those in North Korea, Indonesia, Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela which act as puppet states for them.

    To say there might be a few normal but misled people on those instances is a pointless distinction because they are Tankie instances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    I chill with the bears all day and nobody says that. You seem to be extremely reactionary to that ideology and I think you should step back and look at how polarized you are. It can't be a healthy mindset. I mean you immediately responded like this and downvoted me for saying something pretty benign from a software development angle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (11 children)

    For a mental exercise, you oppose ethnic cleansing of muslim groups such as the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    You're gonna wrap this back around to China and the Uyghurs like I'm in love with China or some shit, aren't you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    Damn, I had the popcorn ready and everything..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Well, you could play it out a bit from there.

    If we tie it back to love of China and Uyghurs we could go with "If there's a Uyghur genocide in China, then there's also a Black genocide in America!"

    Or maybe "How do you pose a country should respond to violent separatism and terrorist attacks?"

    But then it all just pivots into Ukraine and Russia. First to accuse the other of serving Putin wins. (Or loses?)

    Which then provokes a call to separate genocides into ones using bombs and bullets and ones that aren't.

    Which then circles on back to Palestine and Israel.

    For true ouroubos debatelording.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Have you considered genociding the genociders? Nobody ever really wants to talk about using their methods against them because it’s dark, brutal, and requires dehumanizing people even if we see their actions as inhuman. So we frame the struggle as one of righteousness, remaining noble when they do not, compassionate to the point they exploit it as a weakness. We’re up against callous, selfish, cruel people of all religions, political philosophies, and immutable traits who think one of those things makes them and their tribe superior to those not of the tribe. They infiltrate, corrupt, or bypass whatever social systems we govern ourselves with, sometimes for their personal gain, sometimes for the sake of the state over the rights of the individuals within the state. People seem to accept that fighting back is sometimes the option but want it to be cinematic underdog triumph stories, as if violence as a last resort and with deep regret is more noble than using whatever opportunity one has to eliminate an enemy that has declared themselves an enemy, knows they’re brutal, dispenses death on the daily, and wouldn’t hesitate to destroy someone they identified as an enemy or undesirable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    That’s the core of the moral dilemma. It exists because one side says to take such action is wrong but the other side has no problem doing so, and in our hesitation the most vulnerable are abused, raped, and slaughtered. They currently don’t understand any language but violence, so at what point do we respond to them on their terms? We’ll carry the burden of what we’ve done for our lifetime because we recognize that human beings are human, even one as vile as Trump. He and his kind are irredeemable because no amount of appeals to goodness will sway them from their course and every day you spend trying to reason with them is another day their hate and power has to abuse the most vulnerable. You could lock them away and prevent that individual from causing harm, but that’s a singular solution after the fact and life has shown the threat of such consequence does nothing to stop such people from acting on their impulses in the moment. At what point do people who’d prefer not to harm other people decide that violence is violent but the only means of preventing others from committing it? When does their intolerable behavior come full circle and become a solution we find tolerable? At what point do individuals start putting themselves between the victim and the victimizer but instead of self sacrificing in an effort to slow them down, meets violence with violence and ends the threat?

    I guess the point of becoming like them is that we do so not for our personal satisfaction or gain, as they do, but to try and eliminate the threat to those who can’t defend themselves presently and give those who will come after us a better foundation upon which to build their version of society. My grandfather fought Nazis in WWII, and while he never shared all the details I know at some point he was forced to kill indoctrinated kids with guns because if he didn’t he and his would be killed and the regime they were seeking to topple would continue doing what they were doing. It’s a shit reality and I know he carried the burden of what he had to do for the rest of his life, but he survived, they didn’t, he came home and spent the remainder of his years being a decent human being, they forfeited their chance at that because they fought for a cruel version of society. I don’t want to have to embrace the kill or be killed mentality, but at what point do we accept it’s come to that stand our ground on the terms they’ve set?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    You're one of the most diligent apologists for the netanyahu/biden/harris administration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    I've never apologized for Netanyahu, I've been insulting that pos for like 2 decades.

    Also, this you?

    "Since you’re going to assume in the worst possible faith that I didn’t vote for harris unless I say this first, I voted for harris."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I’ve never apologized for Netanyahu, I’ve been insulting that pos for like 2 decades.

    It must be a grave insult how you carry water for his pets biden and harris.

    Also, this you?

    It is. Centrists will be like "it's not voting for genocide to vote for harm reduction!" and then turn around and be like "YOU SUPPORT GENOCIDE BECAUSE YOU DID WHAT I SAID TO DO!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Need to nuke mods all over. Go to 100% community ownership. Why the fuck any lefty accepts mods is beyond me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Not every person can handle the responsibility of the power to push any content to anyone and everyone, thus mods were born out of necessity. Without them the communities you like would be spammed with at best AI scams begging for money and at worst CSAM so as to make it unusable by the people who disagree with your community.

    However, you're 100% able to buy your own hardware, launch your own instance, and start your own community, just as everyone else is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    No. Mods were born out of corporate and political interest to control mass media. Nothing more. Mods are there to convert digital spaces to align with their interest. They're there to prevent people from actually forming another Egyptian spring, wiki leaks, anonymous or anything that could disrupt the current power structure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    How would you handle the CSAM issue though?

    Few years ago it was an issue since someone spammed CSAM that it got federated to multiple servers and it took concentrated effort from community mods and instance admins to solve the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    Automation plus mods are there to handle CSAM. Mods should be a nuclear option. But again give communities more control. Mods are not uphold an ever growing list of vague rules like cops who arrest and beat citizens for "resisting arrest". It's a system of abuse.

    But ask yourself who has massive amounts of CSAM to randomly post across the internet to force an expansion of measure and control. Sounds a lot like something we know governments do.

    For decade I've heard this defense that if mods weren't there, we'd have CSAM in every corner of the internet. Much like if we didn't have American military invading rural villages and dropping bombs on schools then we wouldn't have any freedoms.

    Look at reddit. We only found out a little bit of who mods were. Some were powerful people. Some were just marketing teams. It's control. If you're all leftist and you support mods you're a class traitor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    I very much want to see how this “community run” forum would operate. Does everyone have the ability to remove comments or other users? Would it be up to the votes to decide what stays or not? What then when someone posts something actually offensive? It just stays there until everyone can decide what to do with it? Like, please explain it to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I don't know which is the whole point of finding community solutions. No single person has the solution. A community develops it over time.

    This was suppose to be a leftist leaning spaces. If they can't fucking figure out how to moderate how do they expect to implement any of the core ideals. Cooperatives for example are exactly that.

    Mods are the patriot act of the internet. It's clear now looking back that the same shock doctrine that applied in every other part of life to limit freedoms and keep us controlled were applied to the internet as well. The barrage of CSAM across sites was the false flag that meant we all responded by giving away community based control to a handful of moderators, often times it was moderators who controlled 100s of other forums.

    It's all to avoid another Egyptian spring. It's to keep your group from joining this other group. We're all on our neat little boxes. Boxes that are used to suffocate rather than grow. How many times a day do you need to see post asking which is your favorite marvel character to realize the fucking hell moderation as created.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    So then when was the internet ever “community based” to the point that we didn’t need mods or have separate websites and forums? And then when did we give that away?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    I would say it was more like many places early on tried to build places that were community powered but it always went to a more hierarchical structure. Much like how capitalism and enshittification works. Over time, the people who really want something a certain way will get their way. We were headed in a good direction with voting. Then it's like we just forgot about it. That feature turned into the most useless thing. Remember when sites all got rid of it at the same time? That was weird right. Maybe not so weird if they were all doing it because of outside pressure. Now we still have up and down arrows but they don't do nothing

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    It is in-fact working. No one is banned by their own instance for aligning with their opinion. If they are banned by a different instance, they can create their own community in their instance. Block them, block their instance, do fuck all to never hear from them again.

    I know there are a lots of shills from mothership throwing shade on decentralization but this is what actual "freedom" on the internet is like that hasn't been around since forums disappeared.

    If this ain't for you. GTFO.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    me watching the constant mill of fediverse drama between hexbear/piefed/world/dbzer0 from a tiny irrelevant instance

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Does your instance have open signups? I'm pretty tired of the assumptions people make about me due to db0

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Can join ours. Not small, but completely neutral - no drama, no defederation, no prejudice towards the users.

    Personal choice is paramount here. Crafted with love, peacefully housing people all across the political spectra.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago*

    same here, i tried to understand the dbzero/pefed drama, its all tankies trying argue with the ADMINS how thier misinformation harrasments, and peddling isnt what they claim, but they would not be so kind in return. that staments users was up to something a few months ago with the piefed admins, i assume he leans into tankie territoriy. its the same as arguing with conservatives since they are a mirror image, had enough of propaganda on reddit to ignore this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The funny part is that as a db0 user, I haven’t even really seen the drama. I’ve seen people talking about the drama, but the only thing I’ve directly seen has been when the db0 admins got banned. Which seemed pretty funny on a petty level, but also raises a lot of questions about whether or not they’d still be able to effectively moderate if they’re banned from instances that their users are still interacting on.

    Like if piefed were to ban a db0 admin, could that db0 admin still see (and take action) when a piefed user is causing trouble on db0? Does the ban hide piefed users, and potentially allow them to break db0 rules with impunity? Or inversely, piefed would have no right to complain about db0 users causing trouble on piefed communities if the db0 admins can’t see it to take action. If I were to go post something bad on piefed, could the db0 admins see it to take action against me? I’m honestly not sure how the mod tools would work in that instance, especially if the ban prevents the banned admin from seeing the offending posts in either direction.

    I’m not saying instance admins should have carte blanche to do whatever they want without risk of getting banned. But banning an admin should probably be considered more heavily than simply banning a regular user, especially if you’re still planning on remaining federated with that instance.

    I can see an argument being made that an admin ban should automatically defederate the admin’s instance, unless the mod tools still allow the banned admin to police their own users. But even then, allowing the banned admin to circumvent the ban using mod tools runs the risk of completely defeating the purpose of the ban. Because it would essentially allow the banned admin to evade (or at least partially evade) the ban by falling back to the mod tools instead. For instance, what if an admin was banned for stalking or harassing a user, but the admin tools still allow the banned admin to stalk and harass that user? In that case, the banning instance has made a good faith attempt to protect their user from the banned admin, and the built-in tools are preventing that action from being effective. Or inversely, what if one instance admin bans another, to attempt to hide their activities on the banned admin’s home instance? If the db0 admin is banned from piefed, can they still see piefed users who interact with db0 communities? If not, that could easily be abused to enable brigading/raiding/takeovers/etc.

    It’s a tricky game of push and pull. One side of me wants to say that banning an instance admin shouldn’t prevent them from seeing your instance at all, because you’re still federated. Stop them from posting or commenting as a regular user, but still allow them to do admin things like police their users’ comments. After all, if you’re still federated, they should be fully able to police their own users. If db0’s admin can’t see activity on piefed, piefed loses the right to complain when db0 users cause trouble on piefed.

    But that runs the risk of making bans seem pointless, and would push admins towards defederation instead. Especially since basically anyone can spin up an instance and become their own admin. And (at least in my mind) defederation should be a last resort, not a first choice. Because defederation has the potential to affect vast swaths of the fediverse, not just the admin directly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Banned admins can still see instance users from the instance that banned them, but in lemmy at least our moderation actions get silently dropped. I don't know if that's true of piefed, but if it is, it means that any malicious users from other instances we handle won't be moderated when viewed by piefed. E.g a spammer's posts would still remain visible on their side

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 62 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    PPB is "Pig Pooping on Balls." One of hexbear's favorite reaction photos is a pig with testicles so large they stick out back, and the pig literally has some of its own poop resting on its gargantuan balls.

    So I guess they have a list of users they see as helpless, ignorant pigs. Delightful bunch, those hexbears.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    This is so on point for hexbear

    They don't seem to realize how unhinged they are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    They fully realize how unhinged they are. Back when it was r/chapotraphouse they would convince chuds trying to debate them to show their dicks. They don't respect online discourse generally and especially with those they see as bad faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It's mostly bots and a few psyops employees, imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    On the off chance you're not simply pulling that out of your ass, point out a single unlabeled bot, the admins of most instances will ban them and look very hard at continued federation with an instance that permits that.

    But come on, we both know you made that up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It's a joke that went over OP's head.

    He came to Hexbear to sling shit and get banned so that he'd have something to whine about.

    One user, recognizing the irony, made a joke about Hexbear having it's own list. A mod thought the joke was funny and decided to commit to the bit by putting it in the modlog, while also limiting it to a 24 hour ban.

    That way, he got the ban he went looking for and he gets to make this post, but he also looks completely ridiculous whining about it to anyone paying attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 114 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    Lemmy is a lot weirder of a place when you start to realize instances are like virtual nation-states and the admin teams are ALL despotic auth-rulers with the temperaments of toddlers.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 5 months ago*

    the astronaut meme but its 'wait that is how almost everything ever has worked this whole time?'

    lemmy just fundamentally attempts to accept that that is basically how people work, when you boil things down and remove the rationalizations, and tries to provide mechanisms to manage this somewhat less insanely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 35 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    For real. I can't even keep up with what db0's weird ass mod stances are. I just wanna look at memes and chat with people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    db0 seems fixated on complex governance arrangements. We get it. You're an anarchist. Amazing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not even an anarchist, I just wanted a somewhat populated instance with less down time than world. The political ideation of the more hardcore members of db0 certainly seems like a pipedream more than a realistic plan for government (or lack thereof). But hey, I'll take hate for consolidated political power over bootlicking any day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I agree, but thats not really what im getting at.

    Theres this Fediverse Anarchist Flotilla which is supposed to be like an alliance of instances with shared rules and commitments and whatever. It just seems completely unnecessary to me.

    Its like... 5 people catch up every week to drink beer and watch a movie. Its great and everyone enjoys it. Then one guy says you need a chairperson, and rules, and a secret handshake, and a versioning system for the rules, and a documented arrangement with some other guys who do the same thing at someone else's house, and your own crypto coin for donations, and all the things.

    Its all unnecessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Its an elective (voluntary) federation.

    Within a framework designed for and around federating.

    So analagously, consider maybe a set of countries that agree to a mutual trade agreement.

    Instead of a multiplicity of bilateral negotiations, you have a collective group mechanism for dispute settlement, or maybe steering and implementing a new or revised regional strategy.

    Or, to drop the analogy down to the more mundane and practical:

    Instead of you and 5 of your friends all texting each other seperately, to figure out the carpool schedule for next week... you all just have a group chat for this.

    This can seem unnecessary when scales are small.

    Then maybe you happen to scale up, and then you find that the old way of doing things is actually very chaotic and confusing, and has a whole bunch of serious flaws.

    Then you look back at the goobers that did all that seemingly at the time pointless extra work, and call that foresight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I guess the metaphors break down in considering the mass of "governance structure" in the context of the stuff that requires governance.

    IMO, the FAF is a top heavy absurdity. A layer of governance that serves no purpose.

    Whether or not it's foresight remains to be seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    I feel like this is an overly extreme take. Coming off of being on reddit for years I am astounded on a day to day with just how much I can actually get away with saying on Lemmy and expressing myself here. I find myself continuously reflecting on the fact that even in my most liberal (in the literary sense) takes with others, I'm still holding back, sugarcoating, or discounting things as "worth saying" at least 30% of the time. I don't know what's going on over on piefed, but Lemmy as a whole has been the opposite of authoritarian censorship for me. I've never felt more outspoken in an online presence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    are like virtual nation-states and the admin teams are ALL despotic auth-rulers with the temperaments of toddlers

    So just like the big ones minus the capitalistic machine...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    Our admins are lovely but severely overworked. Most admin teams I’ve interacted with are kind but overladen. Some are definitely emotionally stunted but I definitely wouldn’t establish that as a rule

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

    Ah, drama I'm not chronically online enough to understand.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Lemmy is a reddit-style forum framework on the fediverse. People clone a copy and launch their own instances which can communicate with each other, so that no one person can rule over it.

    So theres these guys who want China to win a nuclear war and the enslavement of trans people into labor camps, Lemmy ML and Hexbear. They are the Lemmy Developers and all money for lemmy development goes to them.

    Then theres this Rimu dude who started development of PieFed which is just another framework to do the same exact thing that Lemmy does and they communicate with each other flawlessly, which makes the Tankies super duper angry because they wanted you to fund their autocratic ideology and help them spread propaganda.

    The reason so many people are so involved in this is that you're either on a Lemmy based instance or a PieFed based instance, so this does directly impact everyone here reading this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Apparently there was an argument that resulted in piefed mods banning all leftists instances, including myself...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Ah, so basically the same problem there is on Reddit with power-tripping mods that manage several subreddits.

    At least it's federated so being banned in one instance and its communities doesn't keep you from joining or making similar communities in your own instance, or joining a different instance

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Lmao. There's so many layers to this.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    The replies to my comment on that post are my favorite. Truly zero self awareness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    The fact that you think the replies weren't self aware is the funniest part of all this.

    Like, you actually think they just randomly decided to describe banning you (for 24 hours btw) as "putting you on a list" under a post about a banlist, and it wasn't an intentional reference?

    If you actually stopped and thought about it for like two seconds, you'd get the joke, but you're so caught up in your original thought of, "I'll get myself banned to show how hypocritical they are" that you missed it completely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    Oh look, another butthurt ml. The fact that I got all of the ml replies at midday in China seems pretty telling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Lmao.

    Hey, did you know that Hexbear literally has a clock saying the time in Moscow? Clearly, those Russian bots are just so dumb they don't realize what a dead giveaway it is! Zero self awareness!

    The anti-communist trolls are not sending their best, folks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I don't know who this is but I'm here for the tea

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›