Climate scientists have been warning about this for at least a decade. They're just not being heeded.
post
We'll never be able to fix the climate issue while Trump and millions around the globe go "it was cold here hurhur! What global warming?!"
USA today? No thanks.
Here are the two studies:
Observational constraints project a ~50% AMOC weakening by the end of this century: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adx4298
Meridionally consistent decline in the observed western boundary contribution to the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adz7738
I have very shallow understanding - I thought the gulf stream collapse would only affect Europe - freezing it. Would it also freeze NA?
Also somehow Brazil would become a desert and Sahara back into jungle but not on the same time scale as Europe freezing over.
I can't access this with either Ironfox or Vanadium browsers.
Access Restricted
We're unable to allow access to this page at this time.
If you believe this is an error, please try again later or contact support. {RM:105}
Do you have a reading mode button at the top? I just enable reading mode (But in Waterfox) and it starts to function without paywalls or popups.
No reader mode button is presented, unfortunately. I use a vpn, but I dont think Ive seen this type of page before from vpn blocking.
Trump doesn't believe in climate change, but he won't be able to escape it.
He's 79, and by all accounts not in the best of health. He'll escape it.
The working plan is that their wealth + AI will allow them to survive well enough, without having to deal with us pesky poors anymore.
It's not hard to imagine. Just imagine you had zero moral compass, and all the resources they do. What logically makes sense? No, not taking care of everyone. Bigger fence, not bigger table. And eventually the necessities of life, like not having a drone explode you, will only be availabile behind the fence.
Unfortunately, neither will we.
This might actually save our skiing conditions here in Norway after all, it looked dire for a while.
IDK if you are joking, but if this pump stops working, Norway is kind of fucked, and will become as hostile to live in as Siberia, and most harbors will become unusable most of the year, as the water will freeze around Norway.
I don't put too much trust in usatoday to give me trustworthy news on climate topics.
That movie had a great chance to teach the word "overmorrow" into mainstream but yay backward progress (congress)
I remember The Day After Tomorrow, it was an okay film but it solidified in me the fear of climate change. The movie may not be scientifically accurate, mainly because they got the temperatures backwards. In the movie, the world froze starting at the poles. IRL, it's going to boil and burn starting from the equator.
Iirc that's already started. All the growing zones have moved further north or south from where they used to be when I was a kid (back in the early 60's).
Oh yeah I've seen it myself. I'd like to move up north to get ahead of it, but there's national lines to get across and taking my pets would be difficult at best.
I've also been noticing that since I was a kid (90s/00s), back then there was a white winter every singe year in my area. Now we're lucky if we get any snow at all during winter.
Then I'll hear some rube say that 'global warming isn't real,' like what bitch?! Have you not been paying attention?!
And we didn't used to have just the two seasons, winter and everything on fire.
While that is true. If the Atlantic ocean current stops, the poles will freeze, and start a new ice age in northern Europe and North America, while also boiling the equator.
Except the warming oceans prevent that.
I tiought it was ice age in north europe and heat waves and hurricanes in north america, it carries hot water up north and cold water from the poles down the american east coast.
No government is going to do anything about something happening after the year 2100.
Exactly! If it doesn’t benefit them publicly before the next election, no government will act.
If I'm not mistaken, the movie posited that the temperature collapse is happening faster than we think and accelerated to collapse all at the same time.
The estimate is 2100 but that's just an estimate. Reality is that it could happen at any time.
At the time of the film's release, it offered a new theory about what could happen to Earth's climate in the future. Sure many scientist just laughed to this scenario. The funny thing is that AMOC research started in the same year. All we have is data from 2004 to the present, of course that is not enough to draw conclusions about our future climate.
Earth's climate is complex, studying AMOC alone is not enough. And one of the biggest problem is that there are other MOCs, not just AMOC, any changes to AMOC will impact other MOCs. And there is a new research called the SAMOC Initiative started 5 yr ago.
There's nothing scientifically inaccurate about that part IMO. There's positive feedback loops hiding everywhere. The bad things come in bursts. For example, melting ice releases trapped methane, causing higher temperatures and more melting ice. Who knows how fast this goes
Sorry, but why would we not use the name AMOC and instead call it the "22 year old movie current"?
What about "Aging Movie is Ominously Current" or AMOC for short?
Probably because most people wouldn't know what that acronym stood for.
As a native English speaker, I concur with your feelings on the matter. I absolutely hate when someone does that and sometimes I won't even bother to finish reading what someone wrote if they just start using acronyms all willy nilly. Hell, you can't even point out spelling errors or grammar errors anymore without upsetting someone.
I sure as hell don't
... It needs to have a title that Americans might actually read.
You know, half a football field, approximately 8 hamburgers, instead of actual measurements?
We're on average 5th graders, as far as reading ability goes.
For the clicks.
'Scientist warn that environmental acronym is fucked' is a headline everyone has learned to tune out.
But if maybe Jake Gyllenhaal can save us.. I mean, now you want to know more, right?
I was really more thinking "Wait...what happened in that movie? Shit, when did I even watch that movie? Like 2007?"
The movie was based loosely on a 'non-fiction' book written by radio host and conspiracy theorist Art Bell.
So basically, that's where we are currently with the state of discourse involving environmental science. We are being warned about something of massive significance and dire consequence by way of a reference to a 20 year old Roland Emmerich movie based on a book written by a loonie...
I'm not real hopeful for our chances as a species..
I need a filter to eliminate any science article with quotes in the title
Compulsory "If you've been paying attention we have known about this and every other catastrophic event since at least the 1970's. We aren't listening to the right people."
Millions if not billions of people are going to be severely at risk and even die. The vast majority of these people will be brown or black. The majority of these people will be children.
We as a species should be ashamed putting the well being of a small few over the majority.
The optimism is we will science our way out of this. Humanity is like a monkeys paw.
So I guess what I'm saying is on the individual level everyone open their eyes don't be a dick and leave the world better than you came into it. Beyond that, sit back and enjoy the show no one really knows what they're doing but the majority of us are doing our best.
Maybe a little doomer view.
I wanna point that we did listenen the right people after 1970's and we pretty much fixed the ozone hole and mitigated acidic rains. Shame we have decited to stop it for some reason.
Also ironically to your statement AMOC effects most the northern europe and there is problem with small birthrate so in this particular catasrophe most people suffering will be white and children will be minority.
Edit; small edit to make the text harder to misunderstand.
In 2100. That’s more than enough time to reboot Friends at least twice. I’m not worried.
It's the next generations problem, and I ain't breeding so what do I have to worry about 😂😭
It was shitty the first fucking time. We don't need to make that crap again.
It will be better this time. There will be a gay Friend, a lesbian friend, a black friend and an Asian Friend. Maybe make the Lesbian a Hispanic, too, and kill two Friends with one stone.
I wonder if it would be possible to set up turbines somewhere to accelerate that current.
Turbines extract energy from flowing fluids. They'd make it worse, if anything.
the amount of energy involved in the AMOC exceeds the entire output of our civilization, dude
Powered by what?
A current we don't like. Or alternatively, whales. Harnessed to the blades.
The cycle keeps northern Europe several degrees warmer than it would otherwise
Collapsing this current should be part of EU's climate goals. If we can't stop it, lets accelerate it.
Calm down everyone, we will be fine
Yeah yeah it's the end of the world. We get it. Just bring it on already. It's not like we can change anything
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY I'd recommend this song as the waves are coming.




all 23 comments