top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Where is the nearest intelligent life outside the solar system?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I'd rephrase and ask "where is the most similarly advanced - relative to humans- intelligent life outside the solar system.

    I wanna weed out all the low hanging fruit and find folks we might have a chance of talking to at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    At that point, why go for 'similarly advanced'? Wouldn't it be more beneficial to target intelligent life that has far outdone our own technologies?

    We would probably have a better chance at real communication with them too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 14 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Not all. There are some bad boys out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    There are no bad dogs. Only bad trainers. Its a human problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I sympathise, but the cliché is not strictly true. Nature is all about diversity. Just like humans have a certain ratio of "bad apples" born where someone is hard wired wrong, so do dogs, and likely all animals.

    Psychopathology is real. It would be a mistake to deny Nature it's agency. There are people who belong in an institution. Dogs perhaps moreso.

    To your point, yes most problems are attributable to bad trainers, but even here there is something missing. Bad breeders - natural reproduction would select for fitness, and truly bad dogs would be limited to a small fraction of background instances. We have lots of people actively breeding killers with outsized agression and fear and ferocity, with hair triggers, on purpose. I'm not talking about guard dogs where fierce protective instincts are balanced with loyalty and bonding and intelligence. I mean literal psychokillers.

    I'm circling around Pit-Bulls and the like, but I need to be clear. The breed is fine. Some of my best friends are pit bulls. Diversity naturally makes most of them good dogs, just more context dependant and trainer demanding. I'm not talking about those. I'm only referring to a small subset that were overbred and the natural background level of freakshow.

    If you've only known pets from reputable breeders, accidental litters or the shelter rescues, understand that these select for the good dogs. If that's all you know, you would have reason to doubt that bad dogs are possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    What are next weeks lottery numbers?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Might get stuck with a small payout.

    "What are the winning numbers for the next lottery drawing with a payout of over $500 million?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Does knowing the numbers actually help? Don't you have to then go find the correct ticket?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    As I pondered at what I could possibly ask, I blurted out "Do I get time to think about this or do I have to ask it like... right now?"

    OH SHIT FUCK I DIDN'T MEAN TO ASK....

    "It doesn't matter anymore, now you don't."

    And with that, I realized... I FUCKED UP...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    do all non-trivial roots of the Riemann zeta function have the form 0.5+xi, and why or why not

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    "How do I guarantee myself unlimited more correct answers?"

    If it's already possible to give one, then tell me how to remove the limit lol

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    “What will be the official winning numbers, stated as five white-ball numbers in ascending order, followed by the Mega Ball and the Megaplier, for the Mega Millions drawing held on Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time?”

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

    Easy: How does subjective conscious experience arise from physical processes in the brain?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    The physical processes themselves are the so-called subjective conscious experience in a way that cannot be better described by an abstraction.
    There's no such thing as a conscious experience without physical processes and no hard-line difference between different physical reactions that would differentiate consciousness and non-consciousness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    By consciousness I mean the fact of experience - that it feels like something to be. That things have qualia.

    It's perfectly conceivable to imagine a human-like creature acting just like us and having a brain processing all that information, but it doesn't feel like anything to be that creature. A philosophical zombie, so to speak.

    That's what's utterly mystical to me. How can physical processes inside the brain give rise to subjective experiences i.e. consciousness?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    What I imagine to be the "true" answer to the question is that "consciousness" isn't really real, but if it's thought of as a result of physical/chemical properties, then there's no dividing line between what reactions count as consciousness (ie, a waterfall or tectonic plate could also be conscious).

    You can't prove that you experience that sort of intangible experience and it can't be measured or well-defined, so I'm personally inclined to not really believe in it at all.
    OR if we do accept that it's a result of chemical reactions and we want to define it in terms of those, then there's not a strong reason to differentiate a human experience from rocks or computers or waterfalls.
    I think people are inclined to think that such a thing exists because we have the abilities of memory and communication, but the concept itself I think is not very useful. Which is why I suspect that a magically True answer would say that the physicality of the brain itself is as close as you can get to that idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Well, there's zero doubt whether I'm conscious myself. It's the only thing in the entire universe that I'm absolutely sure cannot be an illusion, because the fact that it is like something to be me (whatever "me" is) is undeniable from my subjective perspective.

    But you're right that I can't make absolute statements about the conscious states of other people, animals, or even inanimate objects like rocks. I'm fairly certain that other humans are conscious too. This applies to animals as well, and it's probably like something to be an insect. A rock, however? I'm not going to claim with absolute certainty that it's not like anything to be a rock, but the thought of that is so incomprehensible that I don't really waste much time even thinking about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    somebody will argue that consciousness was there first and the whole body + brain is actually kind of a dream ...

    (not how i view it though. i have a different answer)

    my answer is that consciousness does not emanate from the brain at all, but from the fact that we are alive. in other words, i believe that consciousness is a property that many or all forms of life have evolved to have because/as long as it is advantageous to them. this view is called "existentialism" btw. things derive from the fact that we exist (as living beings).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I don't think that's existentialism. Existentialism is about the meaning of human existence, freedom, and authenticity - not about whether consciousness emerges from the brain or from being alive. Your view sounds more like a some form of panpsychism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    What is the most cost effective and realistic way to reverse climate change back to an early 1800s climate and maintain it there indefinitely?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Then you know what to do and get even more frustrated seeing governments all over the world ignore your advice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's why I said cost effective, so it could be a grass roots movement without the need of a government if needed. Though I am sure many would be all for it since climate change will wreck their country and the knowledge alone could be implemented at any time as things get more and more desperate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, that's a biggie. Can I think about it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    What information would be the most useful to have for me to achieve the best life I can before my death?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You have to ask for the proof otherwise noone will believe you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I imagine getting a yes answer would be enough to cause quite a bit of chaos lol. it would almost be more fun watching people squirm to figure it out.

    Also, if the answer is guaranteed to be correct, it would be silly to not believe it..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago

    I don't usually see people considering the possibility that P = NP but it is a large polynomial conversion. If it's x^64 or something then a 256 bit AES key would baloon to 2^(8*64) = 2^(512) which is still massive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago
    [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    What is the answer to life the universe and everything? You know, just for confirmation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Is the answer to this question no?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Winning lottery numbers for next draw. When will humanity go extinct? Where are the nearest 1 billion species with near human level intelligence or greater. How do we safely and conveniently travel faster than light.

    So many to choose.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    What is the text of a json file containing every private key used for encryption and its associated context, sorted by political and financial value?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago*

    What are the exact steps I need to take to butterfly effect world communism into existence as soon as possible.

    For a less consequential question: where is the incan sun disk, does it still exist.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Have you ever had a dream that you, um, you had, your, you- you could, you’ll do, you- you wants, you, you could do so, you- you’ll do, you could- you, you want, you want him to do you so much you could do anything?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    How can I make sure I don't misspell guaranteed when posting? I would share the answer.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    What's tomorrow's lottery numbers?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    What is the full content of the Epstein files?

    (Hope you don't mind if I'm recording you while you give the answer...)

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    Does it get better?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    "You die in 50 years..."

    5 seconds later...

    "Unfortunately in about 10 seconds after you receive the answer, you accidentally fall as you are jumping up and down celebrating, you hit your head and you're in a coma until you get cut off 50 years later and officially die"

    ...

    The End

    Sleepily ever after...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Can you give me the exact locations of all lost civilizations? Ideally any that have Pompeii-like level of preservation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    What is the question-answer pair that would be most-advantageous to me?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • When was the last time my father carried me on his shoulders?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    What happened with 'the safe' that was on reddit years ago? OP never posted followup. Is he still alive? Was he taken by the underpeople? Did he release an eldritch monster?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago
    [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Could you give me a minute to think it over? Oh, wait, shit...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›