Maybe the Principality of Sealand.
post
Not a country, and does not have a sovereign government.
North Korea hasn't done anything terrible. If you disagree, you just need to spend some time in a re-education camp.
I've never heard anything bad about Iceland's government
Estonia is pretty decent. They've been on the receiving end of terrible shit and haven't been keen on repeating that in the other direction.
Obviously they have all done something that someone think is terrible. Since evil is within people, not within borders.
Tiny island nations that were largely the victim of colonization by others. Trinidad and Tobago. Samoa.
Ask a Tongan why their grandparents don't like Samoans.
Uncontacted tribes probably haven't done much.
Luxembourg seems to have relatively clean hands historically I think. They were occupied by Germany though in WWII
Idk, they do shady banking shit for tax dodging billionaires and corpos
Ireland is pretty chill for the most part. Definitely not perfect though.
Yeah, the catholic church shares blame for that but the state was absolutely complicit
I'd argue that the fledgling state didn't have much of a choice but to effectively outsource all civil services to the catholic church, considering that they couldn't afford running it themselves.
Their only fault on their part is how it was allowed to stay that way.
According to the Lemmyleft the only way to be a country not doing terrible things is to not vote and plan on an eventual revolution where working classes seize the means of production from their oppressors.
In the meantime, ensure everyone lets the fascist elements run the table. Thus our consciences are clear and our morals unbesmirched.
In the meantime, ensure everyone lets the fascist elements run the table. Thus our consciences are clear and our morals unbesmirched.
You don't need to post the DNC platform.
The Lemmyright is insufferable, bringing up their complaints everywhere irrelevant.
Said the .world user. Lol
Sure no conservative views on the neoliberal instance. C'mon son.
Judging from your comment history I give you as an example.
Are you not a .world user?
According to the genocidal center, the only evil in the world is opposition to genocide.
Seeing how you get downvoted for calling it out, and Optimal gets upvoted for saying genocide enablers are good... Yeah.
Holy shit the escalation on Lemmy is just insane. Where the fuck did Optional say genocide enablers are good? There's 0 reason to make that claim. He said something mildly critical of certain streak of slacktivism on Lemmy and now he's a genocide supporter.
Do you ever give even the slightest thought to considering if it would be a bit easier to take you seriously if you wasn't so insanely hyperbolic all the fucking time?
Lucky for them that they don't go to work, so they don't have to be part of the worker's revolution. They can just sit at home and be negative on the internet.
I mean generally some terrible stuff happens when a country comes into existence to begin with.
I agree there probably isn’t one, but so what? If a country did terrible things, but if you were the decider so would you, or if you were a product of that age and so would you, then how judgmental can we be.
For example there are a lot of evils around colonialism and it’s unacceptable today , but it seemed widely accepted a couple hundred years ago. Obviously there are degrees and some things can never be excused, but was basic colonialism really a terrible thing, say to an average Englishman 200 years ago? Terrible but realistic
At the risk of getting blasted here, I’ll do it: consider the us attack on Iran as an example. It’s clearly a terrible action. Maybe there are reasons they think justify it, but not available in public, but even if it were in any way justifiable it’s clearly a terrible action. Yet I can see there being reasons any country might decide it needs to do similar. I can see there being circumstances where the average lemming would make a similar choice. Terrible but realistic
top 71 comments