[–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Holy shit the escalation on Lemmy is just insane. Where the fuck did Optional say genocide enablers are good? There's 0 reason to make that claim. He said something mildly critical of certain streak of slacktivism on Lemmy and now he's a genocide supporter.

Do you ever give even the slightest thought to considering if it would be a bit easier to take you seriously if you wasn't so insanely hyperbolic all the fucking time?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No, it’s not a tautology, it’s a pragmatic principle.

    A tautology is a statement that’s true by definition and doesn’t add new meaning (e.g., "A circle is round").

    An ontological tautology would be:

    A system that supports the kind of life one thinks is worthwhile supports the kind of life one thinks is worthwhile.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago

    Essentially, two glorified memes, using text I provided.

    I get that people can have a lot going on, which is why I don't want to nag but it's also not my job to worry about if they are too busy: communicating it is on them. Perpetually saying "soon" is not that.

    Also, I didn't issue a command at them, this was specifically a request to which they agreed, for which they get paid.

    People are responsible for holding their own boundaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Was working at a kitchen as a dish washer. Had this little cart to pick up plates etc. from the restaurant side. Was just returning the cart, fully loaded into the kitchen, to the dish spot and bumped the wheel into something, or it jammed. Tons of plates and food scraps on the floor...

  • source
  •  

    Hope a two part question is allowed but after mostly lurking a lot, I'm noticing that there do seem to be quite a lot of Xennials. But on the other hand, also plenty of rebellious youth.

    In my mind I'm thinking that Lemmy userbase is (very broadly generalizing) dividing into people who saw internet's early days and as such, aren't scared of the slight technical hurdles to enter. They tend to be a bit worldweary but Lemmy does feel a bit more like OG internet, which they like (this is me). But also, there's younger people who are techy enough to deal with the hurdles too but see using Lemmy as a sort of an act of rebellion against the mainstream internet (which I appreciate).

    That said I feel like the two clash a lot since the former tends to have fewer shits to give than the latter. As often is the case in the whole history of humanity.

    Obviously there's plenty of people who don't fall into either camps, which is why I'm curious. Lemmy is small enough to have a sense that there are actual, real, individual people here, as opposed to Reddit's amorphous blob of a massive userbase most of whom seem like bots.

    [–] 8 points 8 months ago*

    yeah people dogpile a lot. One person disagrees, very often with a snarky strawman and gets upvoted and people take that as a cue that it's what they are supposed to think, instead of actually thinking for themselves (but they're totes above groupthink)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I support it as well. In my country we already have ID verification that goes through banks. I can log into my healthcare system etc. by it.

    Just branch out a service to social media sites that answers only one question: Is this person over 18? Yes/No.

    They don't need anything else. By extension, this also answers the question if someone is a real person. Which is another thing I think we need on social media. Yes, maintain public anonymity but there needs to be some verification that they are a real person.

    (Also, Spokeo got nothing on me, wohoo)

  • source
  • parent
  • context