top 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I hate the huge SUVs you see all over the roads, I have a 2021 Seat Leon FR PHEV hatchback, and around here the Kia EV9 is really popular.

While not as large as the stupid Ford F-150s, the EV9 is fucking huge.

The bonnet of an EV9 reaches almost up to my Leon's roof:

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/seat-leon-2020-5-door-hatchback-vs-kia-ev9-2023-suv/

It should be illegal to have a car with the headlight at the eye level of a driver of a standard WV Golf type car.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    I recently inherited an older Toyota Sienna and it's made me realize the current crop of 3 row SUVs and gigantic trucks is mostly sold to people who would absolutely love a minivan but just don't know it.

    • I've got more cargo space than any truck I pass on the road made in this century
    • I can fit my entire family plus drag along multiple friends and still have space for everyone's bags
    • I can stand and walk through the interior if desired, even climbing to the far back from the front seat
    • the sliding doors mean you can get in and out of the vehicle from any parking spot without a door in the way
    • it's got a turn radius so short that I can do a full U-turn without reversing on any road or parking lot
    • the high seat+low nose means I can nussle up within inches of a vehicle in front of me and still see the bumper
    • the engine is has enough power to be comparable to some small locomotives.

    I would never have bought a minivan on account of the gas milage (~20mpg just ain't great, and filling up the 25 gallon tank every week hurts the pocket book way more than my crossover that I got before I knew snow tires were a thing) but holy crap having this much space for people/stuff is incredible and I thoroughly enjoy playing bus/truck with it for all of my friends and family. For anyone who's considered a truck/3-row SUV to be a requirement, they need to do themselves a favor and try out a minivan

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Trouble is, trucks are considered cool. Vans aren’t.

    my work have a Hilux, it’s horrible to drive, it’s like being on a boat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The commercials I see for Ram trucks make me cringe so hard I want to escape my skin. The fact that that marketing strategy must work is absolutely bananas to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago*

    It's exactly why I just don't understand how these trucks are getting so fucking popular in Europe including in Germany! There's been a culture for many decades of the multifunction vans, Volkswagen multivan but also mercedes Sprinter, that one fiat model etc. They are incredibly versatile yet manageable vehicles. You need a bed to go camping : sure. Need to move a couch: no problem. Need to go somewhere with up to 7 people: gotcha! Park in tight spot in underground garage: mostly no issue... Compare with the stupid RAM etc trucks any of those vans on anything except "coolness" and the vans will always come out on top! They need an extra trailer to move a bicycle for gods sake. RAM and similar are just an enormous waste of space and fuel by comparison. These damn trucks need to be forbidden in EU asap. Minimum bonnet height/angle/visibility would be a good way to get there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Like I said, I got the crossover before I understood what actually gets you safely across unplowed roads and unpaved farm driveways in the winter, but I at least knew just enough that I went for a crossover and not some disgusting oversized SUV or truck like plenty of other folks around me go for.

    Now that it's been totaled (cosmetically) by hail damage it's simply not fiscally reasonable to replace it until it's entirely worn out so that's just a past decision that I'm going to have to live with for the next decade or so

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    I drive a 2001 Toyota MR2. My 7 yo step daughter is taller than the entire car. When I'm next to most vehicles, the top of my car is below their windows.

    Even drive thrus I'm usually lower than the window.

    I love my little car, it's more capable than people think. I can easily get all the groceries I need, I've picked people up from the airport with their luggage in it. (I have a luggage rack on the back.) But I am concerned about people seeing me and am wary of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 7 months ago (19 children)

    station wagon superiority

    i need an electric station wagon goshdarnit!!

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    this is the only new car I would consider buying. Of course, if they did offer it in my market, it would be full of touch screens and spyware, so I still wouldn't buy it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    tbh this is why i am still following that "Slate" EV Truck

    A truly minimalist vehicle that not only doesn't have a touch screen, it also doesn't have a stereo system, a cellular data uplink, gps navigation, or even power windows (you can technically get power windows if you want to opt for them but the others are Bring Your Own Tech)

    of course, i'm not putting any money down until the day i can actually get in and drive one off the lot MYSELF... been too burned by vaporware products -_-

    this thing though, at the very least, feels like it might still be LIKELY because it's a minimum viable product single purpose tool:

    It is a MACHINE
    that turns ELECTRICITY
    into GOIN' SOMEWHERE
    And That's It.
    NO MORE, NO LESS!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I've been tempted by a FordRanger/MazdaB2000 over the years. still am

    I have a wagon. It's rusted to shit. I should have taken better care of it, but I didn't realize how difficult it would be to replace when I bought it nearly 10 years ago. I just bought a slightly smaller wagon, with a little less towing and hauling capacity (both power and space and capability). a little pickup would be a good way for me to still be able to tow some slightly heavier loads safely, and have some of the "this is a just work vehicle" capability. but until then, we'll see how the smaller wagon handles the utility trailer. mostly just worried about braking, I'll have to lighten the max load a bit. this new car is a 2012 and basically rust free on the frame. I'm hoping to make it last until cars are inoffensive again. or at least far less offensive

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I love mt Subaru Levorg (aside from its fuel consumption), I wish they made a new version with an electric drivetrain, instead they made the fuckin Solterra

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I wish we got those in the US. I would trade my Outback for one in a heartbeat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    In the interim, the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports Hybrid is an excellent alternative. Versatile, spacious, fuel efficient, reliable, and dare I say quite attractive as well. The Toyota Prius V / α also deserves a shout out

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Back before any good electric vehicles I drove a station wagon and I was following all the EV news in the hope of converting it to electric (the V6 ecotech was thirsty).

    There was an Australian consortium of car industry companies proposing that the Australian car industry could continue, specialising in electric muscle cars, and their demo was the sedan version of the same model as mine

    That came to nothing

    Then there was the US company AC Propulsion which was producing kits for converting a car to electric, but the lead acid batteries of then would prevent the car carrying a load

    That got funded by Musk and became Tesla. Tesla has never made a wagon

    I think Chinese Volvo sells a wagon, but I don't really need one anymore

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    My contribution - 1990 Volkswagen Vanagon. It is pretty large, but hilariously it's still smaller than a Chevy Tahoe lol.

    A 1990 Volkswagen Vanagon painted white with stripes in the colors of the German flag running down the sides

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    In a surprising reversal, the meme got it right (SUVs, 90s) and the title did not (SUV's).

    Even when dealing with acronyms and numbers, " 's " indicates possession.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    I mean this clearly shows how rectangular cars were back then, which is not great for collisions. They should at least stay round.

    Also i read a discussion recently about how EVs are heavier due to their battery (and that's supposedly bad for pedestrians when they get into a crash with the car), and i immediately had to think of how enormously overweight SUV vehicles are today, and people don't complain enough about how enormously overweight SUVs are. In fact some people praise it and say that the heavy mass is good for the car-driver of the SUV because when they get into a crash, they'll take less damage (while everyone around them takes more, btw).

    Really shows how arguments are twisted and turned around when it's the oil lobby that stands to profit from it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    In the case of SUVs, it's not primarily the oil lobby, it's car manufacturers. Put simply, they get to charge way more than the extra materials costs, for a "premium" vehicle. They're making bank out of this shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, "cost plus" pricing strategy (link) means that you make a fixed percentage of profit. When you sell a vehicle for $200, you make $20 in profit (at a 10% markup rate); But if you sell a $400 vehicle, you can make $40 in profit. It's crazy to me that they're not just selling the same $200 vehicle for $220 to make $40 profit ($180 manufacturing cost), but that's apparently the world we live in: People accept that companies can make more profit on higher-cost items.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    It's worse than that actually.

    It's not the same markup rate for a higher priced product. It's a higher markup rate. Crossovers in particular aren't much bigger than sedans and wagons. It's only actual SUVs with off-road equipment (lockable diffs, 2 speed transfer case, etc) that cost significantly more to manufacture than regular cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    I do like my crumple zones, but would like modern cars to downsize like they did in the malaise era.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Not the 90s, return to most people not owning a car

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Hell yeah, I want to have a horse and a wagon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    It was always an american disease from my perspective. But it slowly infected Europe. Now every goddamn household drives a fucking huge ass minibus/truck/Fucking Hummer sized family wagon to work.

    The worst part is when they take up so much parking space that the lots next to them are practically unusable because they fuck you, I needed this bigass milonstertruck for casual commotion.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Imagine if speed limits were variable based on a car's weight and lethality. Only small cars are allowed to go fast.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Montana does this actually. Cars can do 60 for example, semis must go 50. Granted its not divided up for bro trucks and huge SUVs like it should be. Every state should. And speed limits slow down at night!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The proper big brodozers (F350 at least, not sure about 250) are legally limited to 90 km/h in my country because if total weight (that includes the legally allowed cargo + passenger capacity, but not towing capacity) is over 3500 KG, it's considered a heavy truck and same regulations apply as for a big ass lorry lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Thats good at least. They should be illegal for normal joes IMO. Or have to be used for work once a week.

    I do have a truck myself. Only used for work. 8 ft bed. No ac or radio. A real work truck, not some fluffy bullshit Cadillac mom truck. And, my "truck" is still smaller than any of those pavement queens.

    Bring back wagons!!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    It'd be a difficult calculation to make. Bigger cars usually have better brakes and wider tires and in sporty trim levels of premium cars those can even help them stop faster than smaller cars.

    Audi RS4 with it's sporty brakes, stops 1800 KG down from 140 km/h to 0 in 65 meters. Corolla 1.8 hybrid will do 130 to 0 in 66. Weighs about 1400 KG. Yes I cherrypicked it, but that's the point.

    The extra weight actually helps grip so that cancels it out somewhat.

    And yes, you'll be hurt more if you're hit by a bigger car at the same speed - but speed matters more (energy equals mass times velocity squared after all) and if the bigger car is able to stop faster, that means it's more survivable, assuming the driver or some driver aid system does indeed try and slow down the car - if not, then the heavier car is for sure more dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Bigger cars do WAY more damage. To pedestrians, the impact is higher on the body and far more lethal; and to other vehicles, well that's obvious.

    I think you're right though, with simplified physics the additional traction does cancel out the additional momentum.

    But wider tyres and expensive brakes actually don't make a difference. More contact with the ground just reduces the traction per area, total traction hasn't changed (assuming a smooth road). As for brakes, as long as they're strong enough to lock the wheel, that's enough. ABS helps a little, but expensive designs are only useful if you're in a race.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Oh, that Ford Escort model was truly Fix Or Repair Daily.

    God, how bad it was. The shittiest and most unreliable car I ever had.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    My grandad had one, a 1.4 "Eclipse". Granted he was a mechanic and very handy at fixing his own cars but that thing was super reliable. Now the Orion he got it to replace was another story, utterly useless hunk of crap. Technically the same car but still...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago

    My humble contribution

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I enjoy my small shitbox (2007 KIA Rio5 hatchback) and wish I had a smaller shitbox to commute in

    One of the biggest perks is the fact that my little shitbox is FIXABLE by sane people with standard tools! No special tools, parts are literally everywhere, and all the parts are DIRT CHEAP. The engine is in Hyundais and KIAs from 1989 to 2011. If it's a 1.6L 4 cylinder made by those 2 companies it's the same engine between ALL OF THEM.

    EDIT: The biggest difference is the exhaust routing. The midpipe on the Hyundais is straight, the KIAs it's got a bump.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    You'll never convince me that SUVs don't exist solely to sell what is effectively a minivan to deeply insecure men.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago
    [–] 16 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I mean, it might be small but it got worse gas mileage, was heavier and would kill you in a fender Bender.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Turning a corner was like opening a submarine hatch. The brakes locked up causing more accidents and deaths. The suspension allowed the cars to roll easier. And if you were hit by one of them, you had a much higher chance of severe injury or death due to the lack of crumple zone.

    People really need to stop looking for solutions to modern problems by looking to the past at the things that were the reason we ended up with the modern problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago*

    you're thinking 60s maybe, 90s cars had servos, crumple zones, even abs and tcs. maybe not the bottom tier ones, but it was def available
    i was skimming the wiki page for crumple zone and they had simulations for the '86 vw polo
    you're prolly right on the fuel efficiency though

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I saw a 1980s Honda Civic on the road the other day and it made me so happy. I don't even love that model — the Prelude was the better small car, but I loved the Accord. Still, seeing something from the mid-to-late 1980s (I think they all got a little chonkier in 1988, so this would have been older than that) made me smile. Those cars were good on gas, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I mean they were built for the 70's gas crunch, it makes sense they were good on gas. The SUVslop and TruckSlop we see today is largely emissions control dodging, feature carcinization, alongside a healthy dose of Jevons Paradox. Reject modern car design, demand smaller cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    This is part of why I was hoping the conflict in Iran would keep ballooning gas prices, we got so many small cars and creative approaches to save gas out of the 1970s oil crisis, and a new oil crisis could absolutely do the same thing again, except now a lot of that technology that companies were experimenting with in the 70s is far more viable, so just that small push of a couple of years of oil crisis (honestly just needs to be >$4/gallon from what I've seen) could easily push oversized vehicles off a cliff and usher in the bike revolution that New York, London and Paris have been experiencing across the entire US

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Friend of mine always buys Honda, starting in the 1980’s. At the time it was an Accord and civics were tiny, but the consistent choice made it easy to watch it grow. At some point, I think early 2000’s, he switched to Civics, because they were bigger than his original Accord

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Minivans/MPVs are so much better family cars in practice it isn't even funny.

    They are comfier. Less ground clearance drives better and is more economical. They are actually effective at occasional cargo hauling. And so on. Luckily they seem on the uptick, SUVs are a devolution in practical aspects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Meanwhile me back in University:

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Not with those crash safety test results. I’ll take a modern sedan if I’m going to have a car

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Yeah around here the little 90s car would look even more out of place since most people are driving lifted pickups that they are too out of shape to even lift anything into to haul. Guess what country I live in! :D

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›