[–] 39 points 13 hours ago (10 children)

We have Van Hollen standing up to potentially challenge Schumer.

Why hasn't even a single Dem stood up in the house to challenge Jefferies? The petition to oppose him is 10x greater than the one to oppose Schumer.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    Pelosi isn't running again. She's got nothing to lose. She's fully cashing in on that AIPAC check, even tho she won't be alive to spend it all, given her age.

    And THIS is why we need to show up to Dem primaries in force. I sincerely hope the respective voting populations for these reps remember this next time their primaries come around.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Reminder: Hakeem Jefferies and Chuck Schumer REFUSE to abolish ICE.

    If you have Democratic representatives in the next congress, call them and demand that Jefferies and Schumer are not made Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader, respectively.

    Sign the petitions to deny these two those roles as well:

    Petition against Jefferies:

    https://c.org/rqStFCxkRv

    Petition against Schumer:

    https://c.org/yZmVfcDhfS

    Please spread the word and links far and wide.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Reminder: Hakeem Jefferies and Chuck Schumer REFUSE to abolish ICE.

    If you have Democratic representatives in the next congress, call them and demand that Jefferies and Schumer are not made Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader, respectively.

    Sign the petitions to deny these two those roles as well:

    Petition against Jefferies:

    https://c.org/rqStFCxkRv

    Petition against Schumer:

    https://c.org/yZmVfcDhfS

     

    Please spread the word and links far and wide.

  • source
  • [–] 83 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Reminder: Hakeem Jefferies and Chuck Schumer REFUSE to abolish ICE.

    If you have Democratic representatives in the next congress, call them and demand that Jefferies and Schumer are not made Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader, respectively.

    Sign the petitions to deny these two those roles as well:

    Petition against Jefferies

    Petition against Schumer

    Please spread the word and links far and wide.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago

    NY Times is playing PR and propaganda for Schumer and Jefferies, but if sufficient resistance isn't given, it'll become true.

    Everyone who can, call AND write your representatives and tell them to vote AGAINST these chuckle fucks for leadership roles. They have proven indisputably that they are incompetent and pro-genocide.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 days ago

    Every single one of his political prosecutions failed on the word "go".

    This is just a bigger waste if our tax dolloars for something that's only gonna push everyone further left.

    Good job, you demented pedophile sack of shit.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    And now that they broke (not really) with Trump for 0.000000000000001% of a microsecond before coming back to suck his micropenis, he's on the war path against his own base.

    You love to see it.

  • source
  •  

    With the sole exception of those mourning their friends and family members who died on that day, and don't politicize it, it all is so hollow and performative.

    The US government, and by extension the US voting population who supported the government's actions, have committed orders of magnitudes of 9/11s before and after 9/11.

    In Afghanistan the US killed tens or even hundreds of thousands of civilians.

    In Iraq, at least 1 million people died in that conflict, and that estimate doesn't even include the rise of ISIS which was a result of the Iraq War.

    Even Iran's death toll can be attributed to the US's 9/11 response. Not only did Trump use it to justify the Iran War just yesterday, but the Islamophobia that lead to the Iran war was exacerbated by the colossal surge in Islamophobia post 9/11. Even Bush claimed Iran was in an "axis of evil", and the Pentagon plotted a war with Iran to take place after the war with Iraq, just months after 9/11.

    Furthermore, it seems the only people still bringing up 9/11 as a matter of discussion, are those who want to use it to justify far-right talking points and policies. Even the GOP's and many Dem's support for Israel and the genocide against Palestine is constantly followed with talks about US victimhood during 9/11.

    I so look forward to the day when Boomers and Gen X lose their stranglehold on US politics and media so we can finally shut this performative bullshit down. 9/11 shouldn't simply be seen as a great US tragedy, it should be seen as the beginning of the collapse of the US empire and the reign of terror the US brought in it's dying days as a global power.

     

    I was watching this video on Idubbbz's rise and fall and it got me thinking about the Content Cop he made against H3H3.

    As far as I could see, the Content Cop and Content Deputy generally hammered home accurately how much of a royal piece of shit Ethan Klein and his former IDF wife have become. It really should have been an easy slam dunk as H3H3 is so easily provably wrong on so many issues regarding Israel and the genocide in Palestine, as well as the countless controversies Ethan Kelin and Hila Klein have publicly gone through.

    However, it appears that Idubbbz totally lost this fued, not because of his arguments against H3H3, but because those were totally overshadowed by his own extraordinary controversies and greed, as well as seemingly using the genocide in Palestine as a backdrop to his fued with H3H3, which feels very exploitative.

    It got me wondering, what are some other instances of public figures who were totally in the right on an issue, but lost due to other, tangentially or totally unrelated issues?

     

    I often see a lot of praise of Tito for successfully keeping the various ethnic groups of Yugoslavia at peace throughout his tenure, and thus keeping Yugoslavia together.

    However, isn't one's success greatly determined by their legacy, and what they left behind when they died?

    The country blew up, fractured into genocidal conflict and lost some the best parts of their socialism.

    It seems more that Tito didn't actually fix Yugoslavia's underlying ethnic conflicts, but rather successfully swept them under the rug during his tenor.

    view more: next ›