Well maybe this will do something to increase their reading levels. And as they say, one of the best ways to lose your Christian faith is to read the Bible.
post
Texas recently passed a law preventing books that involve sex from being in libraries. The story of Lot and his daughters, and the famous quote in Ezekiel mean the bible should be banned under that law.
Wasn't there a ruling that the Bible is exempted because it's "culturally important" or something?
At this point I’m surprised they haven’t started rewriting the Bible to bring it inline with their version of the faith. You know, drop the commandment about not committing adultery and swap it with “Thou shalt not abort”. Instead of Jesus feeding the masses and preaching neighborly love he says “get a job you fucking poors” and “hate the gays”. Moses frees his people with the power of the 2nd Amendment.
Also Noah and his sons, and probably a whole bunch more. But god damn is it puritanical to pass such a law in [current year]
I could honestly see this backfiring in a really funny way. Not only will they actually try harder to get them to learn to read, but in my experience kids tend to hate books they are forced to read. In the setting that is church there's more of a peer pressure from all the other kids and adults to learn the bible. In high-school/middle-school there's peer pressure to not read the books you are supposed to read save for those that love reading. The only books I remember reading from those years are the ones I chose to read while the ones I was told to read had left my brain almost entirely by my mid 20s
Banned books are also popular.
I dunno if that's always the case. I still love The Phantom Tollbooth.
On the other hand, I remember being really frustrated by a phrase from another book. (I think it was "Kneeknock Rise"? I remember exactly nothing else about this book, though, so it might not be that.) It was a description of a scene, and it said the dog was asleep, "arms and legs akimbo." Now, I was in... maybe third or fourth grade, so I had never encountered the word "akimbo" before, and asked my parents what it meant. They explained that "arms akimbo" was basically the only phrase in which it's used, and it means having your arms out to your sides with your elbows bent and your hands on your hips. But this just confused me further, because the book said "arms and legs akimbo." I had no idea what it was trying to describe, and could not picture it. I tried to draw a picture of what it seemed to be describing, and continued to find it baffling. My parents agreed that was odd, and suggested I talk to my teacher about it. The teacher was very dismissive, though, saying "well, obviously you've never had a dog, or you'd know exactly what they're talking about." Which...what? Why would you even say that to a curious kid? Couldn't you at least draw a doodle of what it looks like?
So yeah, being forced to stick with a book you don't like does leave a very strong negative impression.
Shouldn’t the bible be subject to that age verification thing that’s going around? You know, to actually protect the children.
Exactly, the Bible talks about donkey dicks and horse cum!
Also child slaughter. Some kids made fun of a dude for being bald, and god sent a bear to tear them apart. Wholesome story.
When I was a kid, my best friend's dad liked to cite those verses when we made comments about his receding hairline.
They made fun of Elisha for being a prophet, as well as for being bald. His predecessor Elijah was said to have ascended to heaven. The kids were saying "Go on, Baldy, why don'tcha go up to heaven!"
And that's why the naughty little fuckers got torn apart by a she-bear.
As a bald man, I approve of that message.
I'm less concerned about the anatomy lesson and more about the celebration of child rape and genocide.
Didn't The Satanic Temple do something similar to that when a bunch of book banning in schools was going around not so long ago?
Kids, there's plenty of verses to read from if you're called upon. Try this one first:
NIV Ezekiel 23:20 "There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."
There’s a lot of….interesting sexual things in there. Anyone thinking of the children here!? 🤣
I was finishing elementary school in the late 1960s, in extreme right wing Anaheim, California. Twice a month, the (public) schools had something called "released time religion." Two trailers would pull up to school, one for the Catholics and one for the Holy Rollers. The kids whose parents had signed a release would spend the afternoon learning Jesus things. The rest of us were expected to sit quietly, reflecting on our moral inadequacy for not being in the trailer.
As you might imagine, the majority of students who did go to the trailer, took umbrage at those who did not. And even then, I noted that there was nothing for the Jewish or Muslim or Hindu kids.

What Would Jesus Do? Flip every fucking table on the planet.
Genesis 19:30-38
New International Version
Lot and His Daughters
^30^ Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave. ^31^ One day the older daughter said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children—as is the custom all over the earth. ^32^ Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line through our father.”
^33^ That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.
^34^ The next day the older daughter said to the younger, “Last night I slept with my father. Let’s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father.” ^35^ So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.
^36^ So both of Lot’s daughters became pregnant by their father. ^37^ The older daughter had a son, and she named him Moab^[a]^; he is the father of the Moabites of today. ^38^ The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him Ben-Ammi^[b]^; he is the father of the Ammonites^[c]^ of today.
I always took that story to mean, Lot raped his daughters but then changed the story. People were pretty messed up back then.
One of the biggest mistakes resulting from the Protestant Reformation's push for the proliferation of Bibles was the belief that one can just pick the thing up and read it like it's any other book, divorced from the tradition that wrote and shaped it. The whole idea that God assembled 66 books and bound them up in leather and dropped it from heaven is both foreign to the vast majority of Christian thinking throughout history AND grounds for a very dangerous heresy (turning the Bible into the "ultimate" revelation of God, rather than Jesus being that or at the very least redefining the Trinity as "Father, Son, and Holy Scriptures").
The funny thing is, is that the same people who hold to an idea that if everyone read the Bible the world would be better are the same who offer selective readings and ignore/downplay the parts they don't like (as we see in this proposal).
Quite a few of those bumpkins believe that not only is the Bible the literally true word of God, but the King James version in particular.
Smart people sometimes do stupid things, but never vice-versa.
Oh I know! I grew up around King James-only people. The committee tasked with finding a new pastor for my church growing up was deeply split over this issue with some members claiming that the New King James translation celebrated the "Mark of the Beast" (this is because the NKJV used a Celtic knot as its logo; yes, the famous symbol associated with helping illustrate the doctrine of the Trinity).
Kind of related story: I had a lisp growing up and went to a speech therapist. Reading the King James out loud was difficult because all the -th suffixes ran counter to my therapy. So I started swapping the -th suffixes with -s whenever we'd read aloud from the Bible (like in school or congregational settings; no one seemed to notice). To the point that this is now just what happens when I read "olde English." Which was never a problem until I became a priest in the Episcopal Church and the early morning services tend to use what's known as "Rite I" which maintains the older English of previous prayer books (the people who go to such services take this very seriously). And so I'd have to consciously undo this habit when celebrating at Rite I masses.
Like others in here, I have a lot of concerns about indoctrination and separation between religion and government. However, I can see a serious argument for Jonah and the Whale and especially David and Goliath as cultural touchstones that are regularly referenced in modern media. Other stories may be a harder pitch, maybe Cain & Abel?
Yeah, if I set aside my deep seated hatred for religious people undermining the Texas public education system-
I do actually think some of those stories are relevant literature to have read, alongside beowulf, epic of gilgamesh, the Iliad, arthurian legends, etc.
Samson is another but even as a kid it felt very „look how the evil woman he trusted betrayed this godly man“. The Old Testament is full of those.
Yeah, but those stories are plagiarized along with most things in the Bible.
A more correct way of putting it is that they're embodiments of far more ancient cultural traditions (none of which were copyrighted, you can't steal a myth).
I don't mind them reading the Bible, if they are able to read the whole thing, one end to the other. For many people, a thorough reading of the bible beginning to end is what causes them to question Christianity and realize that it is a population control tool for those with power (and riches), not the word of a God. It is such an incoherent mess that cannot literally be followed - if you follow one edict, you break another. Reading it destroys the idea that an all powerful, all knowing God was it's roundabout creator. If there was a God surely it could have done a better job, even using inadequate humans to produce the product. So, after reading, you know it was a man made project. The Koran and Torah yield similar results. I think that is the main reason why religions try, or have tried in the past, to restrict reading to a select few leaders and try to keep the propaganda to what they want it to mean at any given time in history.
Do you know how long and boring that is? This would be like just a dozen pages.
The Koran and Torah yield similar results. I think that is the main reason why religions try, or have tried in the past, to restrict reading to a select few leaders and try to keep the propaganda to what they want it to mean at any given time in history.
Regarding the Koran, your statement is verifiably false. It was widely read and memorized by the masses so that a select few leaders couldn't control what they want it to mean.
Quite a large number of those masses, in non-Arabic-speaking countries such as Pakistan and Indonesia, memorize the Qur'an without knowing what it means, which is a piss-poor way of preventing elite capture. More effective is that fact that, in Sunni Islam, there's no formal religious hierarchy, and each congregation operates independently (like the Christian Congregationalists used to). Though social conformity squeezes out the diversity of beliefs, and there are respected institutions and scholars such as Al-Azhar university that are widely respected, but there's no Sunni Pope. Sufis are structured similarly. Shia's, on the other hand, have a hierarchy of authority that puts the Catholics to shame.
Not knowing the language is a problem which doesn't fully eliminate the issue, you're right, but it does eliminate the possibility of changing the written scriptures. As a result there will always be thinkers who can return to the original text and come to their own conclusions, challenging the prevailing thoughts of their region or era, something that has repeatedly occurred in Muslim history.
Your claim of their statement being verifiably false is in itself verifiably false.
Their claim was the works do not inspire a belief in God (for them), and they know it was a man-made project. Since they know themselves so much better than you, they are the only ones who can give their opinion.
Yes, people memorized the Koran, Bible, Tanakh, throughout the history of each faith. However, there are many examples (legions!) of those same works (in whole or in part) being protected by a variety of sects... not one of those faiths was consistent throughout their history.
Remember, God hates liars! Don't call others liars just because one of their points isn't all-encompassing. Recall, they said "I think"... this means it's an opinion. Don't lie, Allah would be ashamed of you if He was real.
you really don't need to get to the end.
There are some passages they could read to open their eyes about religion. Those that their pastor never uses in church...
I grew up Southern Baptist, was in church EVERY Sunday morning, Sunday evening, and Wednesday evening. I also went to the school attached to our church from first grade through high school and was extremely involved in our youth group. I wound up having a bit of a messy break-up with the Southern Baptists and, after about two years of relative spiritual aimlessness, I found the Episcopal Church (which is quite different from the Southern Baptists, what with our women and Queer clergy and openness to a variety of things now deemed "woke"). I remember the Sunday when I heard both the reading and a sermon from Matthew 24 (the part where Jesus talks about His return and says "what you do for the least of these you do for me") and, I swear, I'd never heard that part before then. If I had, we must've just glossed over it. But it was like hearing from a completely different religion and made me really excited about being a Christian.
Oh, man, I would so be there!
Ezekiel 20:24-26
"24 Because they had not executed my judgments, but had despised my statutes, and had polluted my sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers' idols.
25 Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;
26 And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the Lord."
Matthew 6:1-2,5-9
"1Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.
2 Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
8 Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him."
Based on the law of unintended consequences, this is one of the best inoculations against religion.
It's the fundamental flaw of Protestant theology. Hand out ten bibles, absent any further religious instructions, and you get ten different religions. Leave people to stew too long and they just start making up their own Apocrypha - a la Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses.
Texas is already a melting pot of faiths, quite a few of which aren't even Christian. You're going to be demanding teachers read from the Bible to such a wide range of denominations, all with their own priors as to what any of this stuff means.
Like, as a kid, I remember my dad explaining to me that the Sermon on the Mount and the Loaves and Fishes miracle was a lesson on the power of sharing. Jesus took a bit of bread and fish, passed it among the crowd, and then everyone in the crowd helped to pitch in with what they'd brought for themselves. And in the end they had more than what they began with. I've sat in class with people who seriously believe "No, Jesus just magicked up more fish and bread, because DUH it was a miracle". And that's firmly within the Christian spectrum. We're not dragging in Muslims or Hindus or outright born-and-raised Atheists to weigh in.
I'm done with Christians. They can't stop pushing their religion on the rest of us
Freedom of religion (of our choice, not yours).
How to cause school shootings 101
I grew up in Texas in the 90s, in their public schools and going to church every Sunday. I'd be fine with Christianity if they all actually read the teachings of Christ and acted accordingly. But... Nah...
And even then, if that fantasy were reality, it shouldn't be forced in public schools
Christ teaches that He will return, and murder EVERY non-Christian across the globe, billions will die. The lake of blood will be miles wide, according to Him, and as deep as a horse's bridle!
Not only that, the murdered can't even have peace in death. Christ will banish them all to Hell, for an eternity of torture, with infinite wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Why do you want to teach this? Just wondering
Fair point. I wasn't really thinking of the book of revelations when I made that comment. Or the concept of hell. I'm agnostic/atheist now and don't really care what people think the afterlife or end of times may look like (as long as they're not actively trying to start the apocalypse or some shit). I more meant the teachings about loving your neighbor and feeding the hungry and helping the poor.
Pretty sure he also taught about false prophets and not trying to predict the end of times, but they seem to be ignoring that too, at least the extremists. I'd be on board with people living their daily lives how Christ taught is what I meant.
It is funny when you see one theocracy (Israel) in alliance with another (the US is a de facto theocracy, not a de jure one) bombing a third theocracy (Iran) killing indiscriminately. And they all believe in the same God, practicing similar methods, only their rituals of worship are different. Is there a more obvious fact that religion is the source of all evil in human history?
If you are in a comparative religions class or an ancient literature/mythology class and also reading passages from the Torah, Quran, Toa Te Ching, Bhagavad Gita, the teachings of Buddha, etc. for comparison, by all means, read the Bible. If you are just reading the Bible under a pretense to push Christianity onto students, push the law to its bounds and normalize indoctrination (and we know you are), then fuck all the way off.
They gonna be real angry when they get to Leviticus and find out what foods they can't eat...
Lol, jk they'll skip the inconvenient sections.
Talk about how to get kids to reject religion. Do they think this is going to convert these kids?
I just joined Lemmus today. This is the very first post I see and this being my first comment. I think this is gonna be fun.
Are they using the original book written in Aramaic or are they using that NEW one in English with all the translation errors?
You can bet it won't be the Ge'ez translation with 81 books.
Yeah, they forked the canon before it was cut down. The greatest omission that the Ethiopians retained is the Book of Enoch, which is arguably the first sci-fi. Really whacky origin-myth narratives.
Good, the best way to get more atheists is to force students to read the Bible.
it's ridiculous tripe
top 97 comments