Yea, this is "what are you gonna do about it" phase of our government.
Good-night and enjoy your dictatorship.
Yea, this is "what are you gonna do about it" phase of our government.
Good-night and enjoy your dictatorship.
So, they are admitting they broke the law, then?
Bro, have you once thanked Trump doe?
The Dow is over 48,000!
Suspiciously close to the amount of redacted documents
Who cares about raping children? We're getting RICH!
Hey, say what you will, but the DOW is higher than it was when Obama took office /s
Unfortunately the law was written with no teeth. There are no real repercussions for failure to adhere to it.
Well, there are repercussions for us plebs. 'Rules for thee...' and such.
Also no way to enforce. DOJ won't bother and they know it.
They control the supreme court. They can rewrite the laws anytime
Feb 16 2026 Justice Department head Pam Bondi says "all Epstein files released"
"Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in a letter to Congress that the Justice Department has released what she described as 'all' of the Jeffrey Epstein files, saying the agency has fulfilled its obligations under the Epstein Transparency Act."
Mar 4 2026 ... apparently that thing she said was a lie.
Trump has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, and one’s appearance in the Epstein files does not suggest otherwise.
It sounds to me that “The Independent” has been bought and paid for. Not only has he been accused thousands of times, he is a convict.
The second statement is simply false. 10,000 mentions alone are not a conviction, but they sure as fuck suggest he had something to do with it, Mr Journalist
Trump has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, and one’s appearance in the Epstein files does not suggest otherwise.
It sounds to me that “The Independent” has been bought and paid for. Not only has he been accused thousands of times, he is a convict.
Have you not heard of defamation???
It's the most standard boiler plate statement journalist are forced to insert into their stories by their legal department.
Although this raises an interesting point. If Trump sued the independent for defamation clearly he would have much to lose in discovery hence he probably wouldn't do it, so you could potentially come out and call Trump a pedophile.
Then again Trump seems to be killing a lot of people, rule of law be damned
It's why subtext is so important, because this is clearly implied in the article ie Trump is guiltily of hideous crimes hence why the DoJ had to, illegally, delete/scrub files with information in that clearly showed his culpability
They are still trying to "find and replace" Trump with Biden in all the articles.
At this point I am starting to think there might be evidence of something huge in these files. Like the US involvement with the plans for 9/11 or something.
Weird what dates they didn't release...

That awkward moment when Epstein orchestrated 9/11 on behalf of Israel because bush jr wasn't into children like every other politician.
We’re gonna find out that the only politicians that dont fuck children are W, Cheney, and goddamn Kissinger then my brain is gonna collapse in on itself like a dying star.
I feel like when everything is said and done I'm going to owe a lot of people an apology
I hope that foreign governments release the unredacted PDFiles, in full.
I hope hackers who wear thigh-high striped socks release the unredacted files in full.
They are under no obligation to, of course, but I wish we'd see the victims band together and ask that any & all parties with access to the full unredacted files release them immediately. Zero redactions.
There are so many victims though, that you can't just get them on a stage together on TV. And surely some will still not want to be outed.
It sucks that some innocent folks would relive bad memories from an unredacted release. On the other paw, that shield of civility is also letting horrible monsters have free reign to continue abusing people, or to escape the consequences of their sordid past.
As a society, we should be able to treat the survivors with kindness, and the understanding that they didn't "ask for it".
Oh I agree. The documents should get dumped in full and we should treat the survivors with the grace and generosity they deserve.
Then maybe we think of some ways to stop putting greedy psychopaths into positions of power!
Our culture is completely on board with ruining both of these ideas, though.
You know, a simple ad campaign of some brave victims coming out and saying “I spoke up. I looked at the files. I’m not in the files.” could be incredibly powerful right now.
You can say pedophiles on the internet.
What is this self-censoring bullshit? We're not on dear leader's tiktok
…I think that was a pun.
I am not censoring. It is a portmanteau: Pedofile, and a format of document, PDF. For some of us, word play is amusing.
You hope that foreign governments will somehow release us government non-public files?
Im curious, how do you think that will work? They don't have access to them anymore than you do.
WHat's the point removing them? Not like the criminals mentioned in the already publicly available ones have been prosecuted
Aren’t there like 3 MILLION more?
OK, and when will they comply with the law?
Stuff like this happens only in nations that are moronic and useless enough to be run by tax collecting pedophiles, rapists and war hawks. They will get away with this.
Tax dodging pedos, maybe?
So.. everywhere?
Really? Accidental over-disclosure or improper redaction of legal documents only happens in countries "run by tax collecting pedophiles, rapists and war hawks"?
If that's NOT another reason to study and read socialist theory, then I don't know what is. https://redsails.org/
OK in that photo, who are the two dudes and the woman on the foreground...image search?
Didn't people complain about the lack of redactions for victims, even though it has now been confirmed, by those who viewed the unredacted files, that many of those redacted victims were trafficking minors and were authors of some of the questionable emails?
Yet when they take them down temporarily to review redactions, people are mad about that too?
People have all the documents backed up already. If they fail to restore any of them, then we'll know. 🤷♂️
47,635 files were offline for further review
Hmmm, I wonder if they'll include these that were missing, but previously released. These were collected by someone else:
YouTube video of Katie Johnson’s testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRod
Full court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/
PDF of the initial complaint (WARNING very graphic): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/
Nice of them to publicly admit that they willfully and deliberately violated federal law.
Not likely to see any enforcement under the current regime, but it will be helpful for later prosecutions.
I don't think it can keep being called department of justice
my god what a surprise! Would never have thought that!! they'd really do that!!! Maybe the Government is not honest about everything after all!!
So I haven't verified this or seen any official source mentioning it, but there are apparently a huge number of files missing around in the years surrounding 9/11.
all 73 comments