cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/44126927

Goldilocks

all 54 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (13 children)

Goldilocks space is like "my breath immediately turns solid in the shade and my body is turning to charcoal in the direct sunlight"

You need a giant buffer of atmosphere to help average the temperature a bit. Maybe some kind of large rock with a dense atmosphere?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    That or a giant space turtle with elephants holding a flatten rock on it's back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    But what's holding up the elephants?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    WRONG! It is turtles actually. It's elephants alternating with turtles (and then every tenth level is capybaras) all the way down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    This is not completely correct though. It is our atmosphere/albedo/geological and natural processes that help maintain consistently livable temperatures, not just living in the habitable zone. No atmosphere? We'd be like the Moon, where it is too hot in sunlight and too cold in shade despite being similarly far from the sun as Earth.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Also its not true that space is "very very cold".

    If you are in space wearing space suite that doesn't radiate heat properly, you could die from the excessive heat. Once dead your body stops producing heat and the existing heat eventually radiate away and your body freeze.

    Space is neither hot or cold because these are property of matter. Since space has very little atoms, it technically has no temperature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Can't ignore bosons; photon wavelength is a measure of temperature too.

    Space has a temperature, which is based on the average of incoming radiation through that space; i.e. the thermal equilibrium to emit as much energy as is absorbed by a theoretical perfectly thermally conductive black body at that point in space.

    Based off CMB radiation, space on average is a little over 2.7 kelvin. It'll be hotter near stars, but the void dwarfs matter on a cosmic scale

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 74 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (13 children)

    If that blows your mind then think about this: As the universe expanded after the Big Bang, it cooled from unimaginably high temperatures. In principle, this suggest that there could have been a very short window much later, tens of millions of years after the Big Bang, when the background temperature of the entire universe was capable of sustaining life everywhere. Some physicists have suggested this might have created a brief, universe-wide “habitable epoch,” though this remains theoretical.

    I'm not an expert, so this is probably not a muture understanding, but it's cool to imagine a universe where life was incredibly abundant.

    Edit: I got this idea from a video, and I found it! Please transfer all criticism of my comment to this video.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    but it’s cool to imagine a universe where life was incredibly abundant

    There was probably nothing but helium, hydrogen and a tiny bit of lithium at that period.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Those are some of the best elements though. 

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    More weird to me is that, at some point before the first stars, the entire universe glowed through the entire rainbow, so there is a moment when, were you to travel back in time, the entire universe would glow blindingly green.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It probably would never appear green, due to the black-body radiation distribution. When the peak is at green, it just looks like white to us. Our sun is kinda a "green" star due to this

    But it would go from blue to white to red. Similar colour progression that we can find in the distribution of stars

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I'm skeptical of this. Life doesn't just need a certain temperature, it needs to convert lower entropy energy to higher entropy. A uniform environment temperature does not provide any usable energy. You would still need a star or some other energy source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    It also needs something that can form complex molecules. The lightest element we know of that can form these is carbon. That didn't appear in reasonable quantities until the first stars exploded.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Well, "life as we know it". But for all we know energy rather than matter-based beings could have existed more readily back then, and perhaps struggle to exist now under lower density conditions. Thereby making that earlier era more habitable for their type of life, even as our current era is more habitable for our own type.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    The dark side of your body in space is freezing cold while the light side gets hot. You really need to rotate to get that even crispy layer.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I know its memes, but the astronaut tim peake discussed the space suits on No Such Thing As A Fish where he said that the whole get-up is like 16+ layers thick, and the only heating inside is for your fingertips, so you dont lose fine motor function. He said you can be sitting working on a panel outside the station, with one hand facing the sun and one hand facing the shade, and the delta-T of your two hands could be something like 500°C.

    Maaaaadness! (It's been a while since I listened to this episode, my memory of numbers could be skewed.)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Yeah, sorry. Its difference in temperature. I got delta-T in my head and blinkered in on either making a 'triangle' to denote delta or just write it out, instead of just saying temperature difference.

    Apologies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Not anymore, there's a blanket

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Space isn't cold. It isn't hot either.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I forget sometimes that while space isvery cold, it's also an incredible insulator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    In terms of convection sure, but radiation against -270C will freeze you quickly enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The Sun is a mass of incandescent gas, A giant nuclear furnace.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    a massive plasma cannon.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Only with protective layers though.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    It’s funny how something can be technically correct and still feel counterintuitive. Space really is extreme in every direction.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    balmy is an understatement

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    71763 notes

    what this mean?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's analogous to a combined count of how many people have commented on the post, or shared it (or "reblogged", to use the Tumblr term). It might also include likes? I only use Tumblr occasionally so I'm not sure.

    I don't know why Tumblr counts things like this. I sort of like it though — it makes it feel like a distinct place. Tumblr hasn't escaped enshittification, but it makes me happy that it still exists as a little pocket of weirdos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 103 comments in c/curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works view that post