top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 9 months ago (11 children)

"Print to file" to create a PDF, but it's Microsoft's stupid alternative format. Can't even remember its name, nobody used it.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    Fucking xps format. Like almost everything Microslop had touched, it can burn in software hell

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Agreed! I remember back in the day when they first created the docx format. Such bloated garbage. I think an empty file was like 100-200 KB. And PowerPoint files are unreasonably huge too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I remember seeing an article about how the xlsx format description was several hundred pages in length.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago*

    OOXML is over 600 pages, yes. With lots of contradictions and filler words btw. And a "standard" (with scandals abound) that has most of the format as proprietary extensions. And MS Office/365 doesn't even keep to it, so other office suites never have as good support of the format as MS itself.

    Use ODF to save your documents. MS started their "standard" because of it anyway, fearing losses in their customer base (that bound them to Windows).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    That's doesn't seem unreasonable to me.
    It's a hugely important format used by countless archived documents.
    We can't just find out one day that nothing can read xlsx.

    https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000398.shtml

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Actually, nothing can really read xlsx expect from Microsoft themselves. They wanted to get an "open" standard so they could be used in European public administration. But they also did it in a way so that nobody else can really implement their whole standard.

    ODT format is way better than DOCX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Docx is bloated XML, but much better than the binary formats before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Depends on what you mean by "better". I have looked at the xml content before and never got the sense I could edit it anyhow, so any perceived benefit to it for me is far outweighed by the ginormous file sizes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    The best part is Word for example now by default just outputs a PDF file if you tell it to export an XPS file, which gets extra funny if you have a licensed version of Acrobat installed because Acrobat installs an extension to also export as a PDF except it works worse!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 120 points 9 months ago (18 children)

    Until you realize that a PDF is literally just a format based around a standard set of instructions used to print documents.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 165 points 9 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Potable Document Format. Retains formatting and safe to consume.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    For those not in the know... PDF is a particular set of conventions for delivering peograms written in a programming language called "Postscript", and like all programs they can be hijacked to trigger unexpected results, including the delivery of software viruses. And yes, while those programs run in "sandboxes" that are supposed to prevent propagation of harm, such environments can fall in that purpose due to creative triggering of imperfections in the sandbox code by the "contained" Postscript code.

    Hence, quotes are used to convey lack of trust in the claim of safety.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Next time someone asks me what PDF stands for, this is what I will tell them

    (I'm reflecting on how many times I've been asked what PDF stands for, because my comment would suggest it is a thing that happens often.

    Doofensmirtz_meme.jpeg: "if I had a nickel for every time someone asked me what PDF stood for, I'd have two nickels. — which isn't much, but it's weird that it happened twice"

    I think I'm just most people's token techy friend. Or more specifically, I'm the techy friend who also knows loads of random shit and really enjoys answering random questions)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, if you print to a printer what you're most often doing is saving it as an Adobe PostScript file and sending that to the printer. PDF is similar, just with extra bells and whistles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    It was like that back in the eighties, until the manufacturers decided to save on the chips by moving functionality into the drivers. Which was basically the start of everyone's problems with printers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Im not so sure. I bet more than half of the drivers out there produce PCL output, and there are a lot of printers that use other languages too like ZPL and a myriad of others.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    exports are subject to tariffs, only religious people can be saved. So printing is the secular, free trade choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 172 points 9 months ago (29 children)

    You're not lying. You are printing it as a PDF. Your electronic buddy doesn't see a difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    This is as much linguistic tomfoolery for humans as it is a con for computers.

    I dont know the history, but the most likely case is some microsoft engineer implemented the "print as pdf" option to get around an adobe restriction in the far past, and now we have this weird convention where you can "print" to only 1 filetype to "save" it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Someone else pointed out that printing to pdf was a universal solution no matter the program. Instead of each program having to make their own export option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Thats not 100% correct. This didnt use to be an option, nor is pdf the default printing "format" used by printers. Thats more PCL.

    "Print to pdf" was added to Windows at some point after PDF became a common file format.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    What? I'm saying it was added because it was independent of the program. You could print to pdf from anywhere be it word, or notepad, or tax software, or a browser, or whatever shitty proprietary program you had. Instead of waiting for each of those programs to add an export as PDF option. I have no idea what you misinterpreted that into.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 9 months ago* (13 children)

    Beyond that, also, what's so hard about clicking on "File > Export As... > PDF" which is literally in the file menu on LibreOffice at the very least. I don't know about MS Office, but I would assume it's the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    I'm going to assume you're on the younger side. That's a relatively recent thing. For many many years we had to install PDF printers.

    Also the PDF printer is generic, but the export has to implemented for each application individually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Still using it today whenever I need to flatten a PDF with my scanned signature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm in my forties. The post we are talking about was made in February 2026. Priyanka Lakhara definitely looks younger than me, didn't even make her Twitter account until January 2024.

    What does age or how it worked in the past have to do with a post made... four days ago by someone who is either late twenties to mid-thirties at most?

    Also, in those old timey wimey years I was just pirating Adobe Acrobat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The age comment is not about the age of the posts, but about how you seem so surprised about printing as PDF rather than export as PDF.

    Using a virtual printer was the norm until relatively recently, and even then it's still the most effective because anything than can print can use that to generate a PDF.

    That's how I still create PDFs honestly.

    Didn't want you offend, sorry if came out wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Well, but we're not just talking about Office. What about browsers, document viewers, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Postscript (not the P in PDF, even though I think it should have been) is how Portable Document Format is made.

    PostScript’s original purpose was for formatting documents to print with laser printers, but to also interpret font hinting and display features for lower resolution printing. But it required printers to process them before rasterization.

    It was so good at this that it made sense to also use it for the much lower resolution of computer screens once computers were powerful enough to do the rasterization themselves. Hence the PDF replacing most .PS (PostScript) files, unless you were a graphic design student in the late 90s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

    When you are saving it as a .txt file, you are printing it as a .txt file, the computer sees no difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Not how printing as pdf works but I appreciate the effort

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I'm sorry but I am the head of printing operations at work and I can assure you, that is exactly how computers work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Oh! Apologies sir. I didn't realize you were the one casting the printer summoning seances from that side of the veil. You know if you ever need support you can draw out the four runes on the back of the book.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I haven’t looked at the printer driver interface on various different operating systens, but I imagine programmatically you don’t write ACSII text directly to it, the way you would with file io calls. Though on Linux you have “lpr” where you can pipe text directly to the command. It’s possible a printer could natively support this, but clearly it would be a different interface to render anything more complex than ascii text.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago

    I think it's worse that it's quicker to take a screenshot of an image online than going through the trouble of saving it.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I see you too are a person of culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    Dude, LaTeX one of the worst piece of software that is still prevalent today, perhaps the only thing worst is Microsoft Word (and similar WYSIWYG thingy).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    This video gave me a background on LaTeX I didn't know about before (didn't know Knuth was behind it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y65FRxE7uMc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    I thought Knuth is the developer of TeX, not LaTeX... That being said, I am not overly fond of the things coming out of Stanford in that generation, like lisp, TeX, and LaTeX.

    Because of anonymity, I am gonna voice some strong opinions ;) These tools feels very much like the typical products of "west-coast PL": they feel hacky, way too flexible and end up doing nothing well, and definitely born out of the whole "hacker culture" and "engineering culture".

    Maybe Scheme and Racket is better, but I never spend the time to look into them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    I assumed LaTex is a descendant of TeX. I'm not really well informed about the history of this kind of stuff, which is why I found it interesting.

    Your POV is also interesting, as I always kind of held "hacker culture," in pretty high regard. But, now that I think about it, I see the appeal of rigorous, well studied things, built very deliberately, on strong foundations. I guess that's why I instinctively like things like Haskell, the kind of ML with provable bounds, information theory, etc. I've never messed around with Lisp-like languages, but I remember my ML-focused advisor speaking of them from when symbolic-AI and self-modifying code was all the rage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I discovered on Macs, you can unlock a "protected" PDF this way. Just open the PDF in Safari, File > Print > Save as PDF. It outputs a PDF that's identical, except it's unlocked (it doesn't get converted to a bunch of raster images).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Pretty sure that works on all OSes.

    Pdf24 let's you just mass import pdfs and unlock them without destroying things like bookmarks and the text. I'm sure there's other similar options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago

    What a great shitpost. Fueled a strong comment section. Well done!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Who remembers printing to a Postscript file and then running that through Acrobat to get a PDF? Back in the 90s when PDFs had to be explained.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    But it's not anymore. All of the main browsers let you save it directly.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    How? The only options under "Save" that I see are ways to save the page as html or whatever. Nothing for pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The application (or browser functionality) showing you the PDF should offer a button for that. However, the website might customize or replace that application to prevent it to give you a download button.

    But, those functionalities (PDF viewing) are mostly in the client, so you need the PDF file locally anyway, so you might find it in the Network tab in the web developer tools (F12).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, I think I understand the confusion here. OOP here isn't talking about viewing a PDF online and then downloading that PDF file. They are talking about viewing an arbitrary web page (HTML or whatever) and wanting to save that webpage as a PDF file. Obviously, basically any PDF viewer in a web browser offers a simple button to download the file. But if I want to save a PDF copy of this Lemmy thread, for example, the best method is to print the page to PDF.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago* (13 children)

    Boomers made me hate PDF files

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    the world is run by PDF files

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    And the people who can't open them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    From my time in tech support I know there are two kinds of cases where people can't open a PDF. In one group, the PDF is broken, usually an interrupted download or otherwise corrupted file. The other group, well, one wonders how this kind of people can walk and talk at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    one wonders how this kind of people can walk and talk at the same time

    They can't. These are the people who have a family reunion in the middle of aisle 6 in the grocery store because the haven't seen little Breighlynne since she was this big! We need to get together sometime so all the--

    You need to get the hell away from the tortilla chips before I justifiably crash out!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Having worked at a bank, everything is PDF files. All the billions of dollars in loans, assets, and accounts etc. it's all PDF files of agreements and terms. The entire finance industry would be heavily destabilized if the industry somehow rug pulled them on PDFs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Did you used to love pdf files?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Or alternatively, why don’t we run with that approach? So many things would benefit from “save to text”. A bit farther afield but why not save to image, save to html, etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›