you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 172 points 9 months ago (29 children)

You're not lying. You are printing it as a PDF. Your electronic buddy doesn't see a difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    This is as much linguistic tomfoolery for humans as it is a con for computers.

    I dont know the history, but the most likely case is some microsoft engineer implemented the "print as pdf" option to get around an adobe restriction in the far past, and now we have this weird convention where you can "print" to only 1 filetype to "save" it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Someone else pointed out that printing to pdf was a universal solution no matter the program. Instead of each program having to make their own export option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Thats not 100% correct. This didnt use to be an option, nor is pdf the default printing "format" used by printers. Thats more PCL.

    "Print to pdf" was added to Windows at some point after PDF became a common file format.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    What? I'm saying it was added because it was independent of the program. You could print to pdf from anywhere be it word, or notepad, or tax software, or a browser, or whatever shitty proprietary program you had. Instead of waiting for each of those programs to add an export as PDF option. I have no idea what you misinterpreted that into.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 9 months ago* (13 children)

    Beyond that, also, what's so hard about clicking on "File > Export As... > PDF" which is literally in the file menu on LibreOffice at the very least. I don't know about MS Office, but I would assume it's the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    I'm going to assume you're on the younger side. That's a relatively recent thing. For many many years we had to install PDF printers.

    Also the PDF printer is generic, but the export has to implemented for each application individually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Still using it today whenever I need to flatten a PDF with my scanned signature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm in my forties. The post we are talking about was made in February 2026. Priyanka Lakhara definitely looks younger than me, didn't even make her Twitter account until January 2024.

    What does age or how it worked in the past have to do with a post made... four days ago by someone who is either late twenties to mid-thirties at most?

    Also, in those old timey wimey years I was just pirating Adobe Acrobat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The age comment is not about the age of the posts, but about how you seem so surprised about printing as PDF rather than export as PDF.

    Using a virtual printer was the norm until relatively recently, and even then it's still the most effective because anything than can print can use that to generate a PDF.

    That's how I still create PDFs honestly.

    Didn't want you offend, sorry if came out wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Well, but we're not just talking about Office. What about browsers, document viewers, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Postscript (not the P in PDF, even though I think it should have been) is how Portable Document Format is made.

    PostScript’s original purpose was for formatting documents to print with laser printers, but to also interpret font hinting and display features for lower resolution printing. But it required printers to process them before rasterization.

    It was so good at this that it made sense to also use it for the much lower resolution of computer screens once computers were powerful enough to do the rasterization themselves. Hence the PDF replacing most .PS (PostScript) files, unless you were a graphic design student in the late 90s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

    When you are saving it as a .txt file, you are printing it as a .txt file, the computer sees no difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Not how printing as pdf works but I appreciate the effort

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I'm sorry but I am the head of printing operations at work and I can assure you, that is exactly how computers work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Oh! Apologies sir. I didn't realize you were the one casting the printer summoning seances from that side of the veil. You know if you ever need support you can draw out the four runes on the back of the book.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I haven’t looked at the printer driver interface on various different operating systens, but I imagine programmatically you don’t write ACSII text directly to it, the way you would with file io calls. Though on Linux you have “lpr” where you can pipe text directly to the command. It’s possible a printer could natively support this, but clearly it would be a different interface to render anything more complex than ascii text.

  • source
  • parent