you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Agreed! I remember back in the day when they first created the docx format. Such bloated garbage. I think an empty file was like 100-200 KB. And PowerPoint files are unreasonably huge too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I remember seeing an article about how the xlsx format description was several hundred pages in length.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago*

    OOXML is over 600 pages, yes. With lots of contradictions and filler words btw. And a "standard" (with scandals abound) that has most of the format as proprietary extensions. And MS Office/365 doesn't even keep to it, so other office suites never have as good support of the format as MS itself.

    Use ODF to save your documents. MS started their "standard" because of it anyway, fearing losses in their customer base (that bound them to Windows).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    That's doesn't seem unreasonable to me.
    It's a hugely important format used by countless archived documents.
    We can't just find out one day that nothing can read xlsx.

    https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000398.shtml

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Actually, nothing can really read xlsx expect from Microsoft themselves. They wanted to get an "open" standard so they could be used in European public administration. But they also did it in a way so that nobody else can really implement their whole standard.

    ODT format is way better than DOCX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Docx is bloated XML, but much better than the binary formats before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Depends on what you mean by "better". I have looked at the xml content before and never got the sense I could edit it anyhow, so any perceived benefit to it for me is far outweighed by the ginormous file sizes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment