0 hot? So what about when it’s -40?
post
How is freezing cold, 32% hot? What am I missing here?
Because I can still walk to the mailbox in shorts at 32
Or pull the trash cans to the curb!
You could still do that at -10% hot, so I don't get your argument.
Yeah but I can't be -10% naked, at 0°f I'm 0% naked, I have on all the layers that I could possibly layer. At 100°F I want to be 100% naked, minimal clothing socially required because it's hot outside. My outfit might change from 90 to 100, but after 100 I'm capped out on what I can remove before I need to either move to a place that allows public nudity or just resolve myself to public indecency charges. At 32°F I can still run out to the mailbox in shorts and a hoodie, that's not 0% naked that's frankly still a long ways away from fully clothed.
and then theres Kelvin, where 0 literally is 0% hot
We need a new scale where 0 is 0K and 100 is the temperature of the big bang.
i tell them i use a 100 hour clock. Day starts at 0 at ends at 100. They see how much better it is and they have an existential crisis. And then everyone clapped
Technically, 1000 beats per day - but yes, Swatch tried this back in ‘99:
Honestly it's not the worst idea, the french have tried something like that during one of their revolutions.
Semi-relatedly, I'm salty they didn't push for duodecimal numbers and base metric on that, it would incorporate the only good part of imperial system & 12-based time system, not only into measurements but also all other aspects of life.
Then they could make time more consistent too, maybe have like 10000 (20736 in decimal) "metric seconds" in a day (which would mean 1 "metric second" ≈ 4 "normal" seconds) and derive stuff from there (e.g. 100 "metric seconds" in a "metric minute", 10 "metric minutes" in a "metric hour", 10 "metric hours" in a "metric day"). Would be really quite neat.
I like how they claimed Fahrenheit made sense by relating it to a scale between 0 and 100 because a grade divided into 100 pieces (centigrade) is a system that is easy to handle. If only there was a unit of measurement that was already like that.
No they're relating average earth temperature/weather to a centigrade scale, instead of relating liquid water to one.
I might catch flak for this, but I understand Fahrenheit made a ton of sense of an illiterate bygone era (well, I guess coming back maybe)
The vast majority of people were uneducated. Decimals were a non-starter, maybe negatives were also difficult?
0-100 was very easy. Under 0? Don't go outside if possible. Over 100? Don't go outside if possible. >50/halfway? Time for a coat. Having the same scale from -15 to 40 might have been confusing and not centered for them?
i've never understood how people imagine an easier scale to calibrate than celsius, what is easier than freezing and boiling water??
Human body temperature isn't an easy calibration point, are you gonna shove it up your ass to calibrate it, or what?
Yeah we know it's a coincidence. That's kinda a part of the joke. No need to flex your knowledge here Mr smarty pants
Celsius is the perfect system to describe how hot or cold it is, assuming you're a water molecule.
People are mostly water, no? Makes perfect sense then.
I'm 98.6° Greg. Am I hot?
Scared to reach your full potential, eh?
That depends, can I milk you?
Technically, you're a 9.8/10. But I can round it up to 10/10 ;)
Except what is cold/hot varies from person to person.
Water is more consistent.
37 isn't really hot yet. It's warm. It's around 50 degrees when it starts feeling too hot to touch.
37 isn't really hot yet.
Tell me how you feel when your body heats up just a bit, from 37 to 40. Sweating? Shivering? Hot and cold waves?
As always, it depends on the context and on the individual
ITT: Water requires over double of all the hot just to boil.
The % is for humans not water. Anything over 100 is too hot.
all of the hot everywhere or just in this room?
It's 212 % of the hot, how else can there be more hot than all the hot? It's gotta be all the hot from at least the next couple of rooms, might be everywhere, depends on how much hot is hogged by the oven I'd wager.
Ummmm? Well technically you can describe celsius as 0 being 0% boiling and 100 being 100% boiling with water. And it actually works pretty well because the hotter it is, the more it evaporates. Tho pretty sure its not linear and also thats a stupid way of saying it anyways.
I'm in Finland. I sometimes say stuff like "oh it's -30°C today. It's getting just a little bit nippy."
A friend of mine in California is like "Jesus Christ what are you talking about" and yes, he can convert that
You must be far north I live in the middle of Sweden, haven't seen temperatures like that in years.
This is a really bad representation lmao, you're giving an example of Finland in like mid winter comparing it to the reaction of someone who literally never sees winter. My state has had around -30°c for the last 2 weeks, been chilling, I've definitely preferred when it's been getting closer to -20 to -10 which has been funny, actually enjoying temperatures under freezing, but I don't get what your comments trying to say. It's not like Finland is that temperature all year lol, the climate of my city is surprisingly similar to a lot of Finland and I gotta say being in the cold still sucks.
Every day I learn that people are even dumber than I previously thought.
See you tomorrow champ
My eye is twitching just reading this. I wonder how I survived 110 percent hot days.
I suppose the takeaway is once the weather is 100 or higher, I don't care it's just too damn hot.
After being in 115 degree heat, 100 degree heat still feels just terrible.
Similarly below zero, subjectively I didn't need specifics anymore. I know that salting ice outside is probably not going to work anymore. Yes it does make a difference, but comfort wise I just hate it either way.
So I can see, mostly joking but a grain of truth that you have "stupidly cold" then 0 to 100 scale of usual air temperature then "too damn hot".
It's like the only way the farenheight scale is kind of appealing from a "humans like 0 to 100 scale", but it's mathematically painful and nonsense apart from comfortable human temperatures.
I worked retail for a decade. There is no bottom to the barrel. There are people driving around in cars who genuinely shouldn't be left unsupervised with metal utensils.




top 100 comments