top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 64 points 9 months ago (20 children)

0 hot? So what about when it’s -40?

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    0% hot = 100% cold

    so

    -40% hot = 140% cold ❄️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    I understand you're being sassy but below zero you do start saying "no but seriously, how can it be this cold?" Zero is about the lower limit before temperature stops being distinguishable and just becomes cold

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    The feeling of cold weather is entirely subjective. A Brazilian from Bahia will wear a winter coat and feel cold at 20C, but somebody from northern Canada would be going out for a swim in their shorts.

    Which is why any attempt at using "oh it means cold percentage" or "oh below zero it just feels the same" is extremely dumb and a easily refutable attempt at saving a bad scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago*

    Yup. We were at an event and it was a hot weekend, mid 30’s C, sunny, so we were in shorts and staying in the shade. My sister, who had just come back from a tour in Afghanistan, was wearing a sweater and shivering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I grew up in the Northeastern US. I lived in the Southeastern US for a few years. My first year there it was 65F in March and everyone was still in their winter coats with scarves and hats commenting that they couldn't wait for spring and I was in a t shirt with sweat literally rolling down my arms and face and I remember saying "wait, this isn't spring?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    There is a BIG difference between 0F, -20F and -40F. And as someone that has worked in areas that has often seen -60F, -20F feels like spring in comparison, the local Inuit wouldn’t even wear a jacket at 0F.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago*

    It is funny how 40 in the fall sees most folks bundling up with everything they have, and 40 the spring is shorts and sandals weather.

    I don’t stop wearing shorts until it’s about 0F out or the wind is insane. Not to like shovel the driveway or anything being out for extended periods, but going out shopping or whatever is fine. Today was 0 with a -20 windchill and my Costco run was done in shorts, a sweatshirt, and a baseball cap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    How is freezing cold, 32% hot? What am I missing here?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Because I can still walk to the mailbox in shorts at 32

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You could still do that at -10% hot, so I don't get your argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Yeah but I can't be -10% naked, at 0°f I'm 0% naked, I have on all the layers that I could possibly layer. At 100°F I want to be 100% naked, minimal clothing socially required because it's hot outside. My outfit might change from 90 to 100, but after 100 I'm capped out on what I can remove before I need to either move to a place that allows public nudity or just resolve myself to public indecency charges. At 32°F I can still run out to the mailbox in shorts and a hoodie, that's not 0% naked that's frankly still a long ways away from fully clothed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 92 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    and then theres Kelvin, where 0 literally is 0% hot

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 62 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I have to be that guy: it's K, not °K.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    We need a new scale where 0 is 0K and 100 is the temperature of the big bang.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    i tell them i use a 100 hour clock. Day starts at 0 at ends at 100. They see how much better it is and they have an existential crisis. And then everyone clapped

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Technically, 1000 beats per day - but yes, Swatch tried this back in ‘99:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Honestly it's not the worst idea, the french have tried something like that during one of their revolutions.

    Semi-relatedly, I'm salty they didn't push for duodecimal numbers and base metric on that, it would incorporate the only good part of imperial system & 12-based time system, not only into measurements but also all other aspects of life.

    Then they could make time more consistent too, maybe have like 10000 (20736 in decimal) "metric seconds" in a day (which would mean 1 "metric second" ≈ 4 "normal" seconds) and derive stuff from there (e.g. 100 "metric seconds" in a "metric minute", 10 "metric minutes" in a "metric hour", 10 "metric hours" in a "metric day"). Would be really quite neat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I like how they claimed Fahrenheit made sense by relating it to a scale between 0 and 100 because a grade divided into 100 pieces (centigrade) is a system that is easy to handle. If only there was a unit of measurement that was already like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    No they're relating average earth temperature/weather to a centigrade scale, instead of relating liquid water to one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I might catch flak for this, but I understand Fahrenheit made a ton of sense of an illiterate bygone era (well, I guess coming back maybe)

    The vast majority of people were uneducated. Decimals were a non-starter, maybe negatives were also difficult?

    0-100 was very easy. Under 0? Don't go outside if possible. Over 100? Don't go outside if possible. >50/halfway? Time for a coat. Having the same scale from -15 to 40 might have been confusing and not centered for them?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    i've never understood how people imagine an easier scale to calibrate than celsius, what is easier than freezing and boiling water??

    Human body temperature isn't an easy calibration point, are you gonna shove it up your ass to calibrate it, or what?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Celsius is the perfect system to describe how hot or cold it is, assuming you're a water molecule.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    People are mostly water, no? Makes perfect sense then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    I'm 98.6° Greg. Am I hot?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Except what is cold/hot varies from person to person.

    Water is more consistent.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    37 isn't really hot yet. It's warm. It's around 50 degrees when it starts feeling too hot to touch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    37 isn't really hot yet.

    Tell me how you feel when your body heats up just a bit, from 37 to 40. Sweating? Shivering? Hot and cold waves?

    As always, it depends on the context and on the individual

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    Is reading this what having a stroke feels like?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    ITT: Water requires over double of all the hot just to boil.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    all of the hot everywhere or just in this room?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    Ummmm? Well technically you can describe celsius as 0 being 0% boiling and 100 being 100% boiling with water. And it actually works pretty well because the hotter it is, the more it evaporates. Tho pretty sure its not linear and also thats a stupid way of saying it anyways.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    My face has more wat than a wat granny wat

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I'm in Finland. I sometimes say stuff like "oh it's -30°C today. It's getting just a little bit nippy."

    A friend of mine in California is like "Jesus Christ what are you talking about" and yes, he can convert that

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    This is a really bad representation lmao, you're giving an example of Finland in like mid winter comparing it to the reaction of someone who literally never sees winter. My state has had around -30°c for the last 2 weeks, been chilling, I've definitely preferred when it's been getting closer to -20 to -10 which has been funny, actually enjoying temperatures under freezing, but I don't get what your comments trying to say. It's not like Finland is that temperature all year lol, the climate of my city is surprisingly similar to a lot of Finland and I gotta say being in the cold still sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Every day I learn that people are even dumber than I previously thought.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    My eye is twitching just reading this. I wonder how I survived 110 percent hot days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I suppose the takeaway is once the weather is 100 or higher, I don't care it's just too damn hot.

    After being in 115 degree heat, 100 degree heat still feels just terrible.

    Similarly below zero, subjectively I didn't need specifics anymore. I know that salting ice outside is probably not going to work anymore. Yes it does make a difference, but comfort wise I just hate it either way.

    So I can see, mostly joking but a grain of truth that you have "stupidly cold" then 0 to 100 scale of usual air temperature then "too damn hot".

    It's like the only way the farenheight scale is kind of appealing from a "humans like 0 to 100 scale", but it's mathematically painful and nonsense apart from comfortable human temperatures.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›