top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 132 points 9 months ago (35 children)

- Make car dependant infrastructure for every single city or town
- Refuse to innovate, build only "luxury" models
- ????
- Profit

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 9 months ago (14 children)

    Similarly with housing. Why make cheap starter homes when you can make so much more with “Luxury” homes and condos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    And yet use the same cheap materials in the "luxury" ones that you would have used in the cheap ones anyway!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I follow some home inspectors who post videos from their new home inspections, and holy crap the things they find are ridiculous. Like, construction companies should lose their licenses bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I visit some partially built homes from time to time, and recently saw one just after it had been inspected. On one wall, on the insulation, the inspector had scrawled STUD? In red felt.

    The stud was completely missing from the wall. It was just an empty frame filled with insulation. You’d think someone would have noticed earlier during construction, but obviously the actual contractor had just let the day labor go to town and never bothered to review their work before inspection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago

    lol, that is 100% every australian apartment built in the last 15 years. the window frames are plastic and the cladding is combustible... but it's got Italian tiles and "European appliances" so it's an "executive suite". that will be $1.5million fuck you very much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    Similar to literally every market that involves 'things', as we transition from failing liberal capitalism to horrifying technofascist neofeudalism (aka cyberpunk dystopia).

    The next step is... well they won't lower the luxury prices, everything becomes renting, loaning, etc, even further and harder... untill you end up with bundled subscription plans / leases on a diverse array of physical things, as we currently have with bundles of online services.

    We literally going to transition to a subscription based model for just being alive.

    ... unless enough people actually do something effrctive about it.

    Other wise, the K shaped economy becomes a === shaped economy. You're either on top, or you're not, and you're basically treated as a kind of cattle; raised, milked, then expended whenever it is most profitable to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    We literally going to transition to a subscription based model for just being alive.

    Isn't that just health insurance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    Yes, that's true, but I meant more like uh...

    The Disney+ life supscription is partnered with Starbucks, which is also partnered with Amazon Whole Foods and Trader Joes, and Verizon, and Subaru and GM.

    The Netflix life supscription is partnered with Costco, Cox, and McDonalds, Chevy and Toyota.

    The HBO Max life supscription is partnered with Walmart, ATT, Honda and Ford, ... Cluck'in Bell, fucking whatever.

    And then also some kind of alliance type structure with various regional or national landlords/land developers.

    Like, uh, roughly the idea of a Japanese Keiretsu, or a Korean Chaebol, but kind of inverted, applied much more thoroughly to the consumer side, than to the finance/internal corporate structures.

    So yeah, you just pick one of those three life subscription plans, they all have various tiers, etc, and you... well you rent or lease or finance basically everything.

    Thats how the idea of a kind of Corporate Citizenship will start, something like that.

    That's my nightmare/prognostication.

    It won't be based around like, families of business that define your employment paths, as exists in much more uh, 'classic' cyberpunk, I guess.

    It'll be oriented around consumption, getting things, because... practically no one will even have 'real' jobs, having a career will become a defining marker of being born into an upper crust corpo elite class of some kind, the rest of us proles will just be shuffled between gig work, retail jobs, jail, prison, military, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    People wanted those mcmansions and rebuilds jack up prices. Now those massive suburban mcmansions are getting old in the tooth and no one wants to buy them. They are realizing they need to build smaller homes finally. We'll probably see more townhomes with shared structures (walls/roofs).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 9 months ago (11 children)
    • Force you to rent an apartment
    • Refuse to build anything affordable, only "luxury" models
    • ???
    • Profit
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Don't forget the government cutting funding for affordable housing projects.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Amateur hour, my government funds 'affordable' housing projects that cost 300 grand and immediately turn into overpriced rentals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    At least housing is actually being built, but I know what you mean. Theres no real affordable housing near me and the wait list for what little is available has been closed due to budget cuts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I recently read an article about "affordable" apartments being constructed an hour or so away. 900 SF, one br and bath, $2200, in a right to work, $7.25/hr minimum wage state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (5 children)

    that sounds cheap to me. where i live a new 1bd/1bath will be closer to 3000-3500

    crappy leaky roach filled basement apartments go for 2200

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    What's minimum wage? These are "low income."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (3 children)

    20 bucks an hour

    minimum wage isn't low income. most people in low income housing make well above mimimum wage.

    stop conflating these two things. also, just because you think it's too expensive doesn't mean it isn't. other people have different price thresholds than you. i know people making half what i make paying way more rent than I am, because that's what they've chose to do because they believe they 'need' to live very expensive places. plenty of people are willing to vastly overpay for 'new' housing, as it's an amenity. just like in my city you pay an extra $1000 to live near a subway stop and if you go 1km away, the rent is way cheaper. or that if you want pets the rent goes up $500+

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    I live in a state where people do make minimum wage, or $8 send I told you what the situation is in my state. But go on and act like you know better than the one living here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Sucks. Those people should probably get better jobs.

    Nobody is coming to save anyone. We have to save ourselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    You know how these people save themselves? Crimes of opportunity. So the next time someone you know has a window smashed in or their FedEx missing, gets mugged, car jacked/stripped or sold adulterated street drugs, remember this conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Sorry I didn't get that, did you say you wanted an even larger pickup truck?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Can you jack up the front so I can't see and put a bar on it so I can kill anyone I hit? Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    I saw something about being approved for "up to 100k" for a car loan. 100k for a car? Man, this country is fucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    As soon as someone releases a small electric pickup truck, I'm grabbing one and holding on to it as long as possible. It's gotta have LFP batteries, though. Those last a long time.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    I'm on the same boat, though I have a lot more requirements on what I want that electric truck to NOT include. I want a proper work truck that's user serviceable - not a computer on wheels. Untill that, I'll stick with my -07 diesel Navara.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 18 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    Tbh i don't think i will ever buy a new car. New doesn't even mean "good" or "reliable" at this point, just a warranty and that they don't know for sure what or how much is going to break in 10K miles. Its literally paying more to be a beta tester.

    At least after a couple years third party techs have mostly figured out where the manufacturer cheaped out and how to fix it for less than the dealership wants.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Another benefit to buying a used car is that if it were to have any glaring issues they would have all been revealed. Think of the first owner as a prolonged stress test.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    That or they finally got tired of all the problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Could be. But that's why you need to thoroughly go over the car, test drive it and maybe even have a trusted mechanic inspect it before you buy it. Same can be said about a used phone, car, bike, whatever. Do your homework before money changes hands.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (11 children)
    1. Dogmatically sticking to fossil fuels.
    2. "Protecting" domestic manufacturering jobs by refusing to engage with your neighbours.
    3. Using tariffs to keep out affordable Chinese EVs that use tech everyone will probably be using in 15 to 20 years.

    Sounds like a recipe for disaster. You can only artificially prop up your domestic market for so long. You'll inevitably fall behind even further on innovation with this approach.

    Might be the first to make a CoPilot or ChatGPT powered car though.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Look, the Chinese EVs are a literal trade weapon. The other points I agree on. But China has subsidies on EVs even when sold to other countries because they aim to put competitors out of business globally. Otherwise they'd just be subsidizing EVs for domestic use.

    So I can't blame them for tariffing those. But the solution is to invest heavily in domestic EVs, not to keep running with internal combustion...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    From what I've seen it wasn't specifically a global trade weapon. It was more a side effect of central government planning.

    There was just a government program to encourage electric car manufacture to boost local manufacturing. They over saturated the domestic market and are now dumping the cars internationally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Have you been to China recently? Seems like all the new cars sold there are EVs. They're not just dumping them on the export market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    If they were just looking to replace ICEs with EVs domestically, they'd have subsidies for domestically bought EVs. They instead subsidize production, regardless of where it'll be sold. Chinese manufacturers can afford to produce at a huge loss right now and still make a profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Sure China is not some moral or benevolent actor in all this. At the very least they were forward thinking enough to subsidize the future of automobile transport. Some degree of protectionism may be warranted but the goal should be to catch up with China in the meantime, not double down on fossil fuels.

    They're doing what we should be doing. Subsidizing a sustainable alternative.

    Canada and Europe have already let Chinese vehicles in. Canada reportedly wants to make an indigineous EV through sharing of Chinese technological knowledge. Wonder how long the US will hold out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The US heavily subsidizes its auto industry. Why is this being raised as a point against China? It's not China's fault that American auto companies use their subsidies to line their pockets instead of creating cheaper and better vehicles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    And countries that have auto industries put tariffs on US cars too. They also don't get nowhere near as much in subsidies per car sold abroad. And for the EV subsidies, foreign EVs were also eligible.

    China also tariffs foreign cars heavily and always has.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    We have been propping u domestic car manufacturers since they started making cars domestically. Pretty rich for a "capitalist free market" if you ask me. I forget we don't get to be part of socialist America if we aren't billionaires...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I just want a small car I can work on myself. 30 years ago, I could maintain my own car, do some shadetree mechanics...

    But all cars today are meant to be black boxes. All need proprietary tools and computers to do almost anything.

    Dear Santa, could I have a 67 camaro.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I have a gearless (fixie) bike since last Summer, I don't even have a manual for it, not do I really need one.

    Before that I had a fancy e-bike which nobody but the manufacturer could fix. Even bike shops would warn "We can fix the mechanical parts but we don't touch the electronics, if it fails while we fix it, it's on you." and basically saying they would prefer not to fix it.

    Now my bike is so basic I don't care and I think it's even safer from potential robbers.

    So... in my own experience, less is more! It's less maintenance, it's less money, it's less temptation for others, and ironically enough in this specific case it's even healthier. I use it everyday, from Sunny spring to rain and snow, it just works.

    Simplifying is empowering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I'm very pro simplifying, but you'll take my freewheel from my cold dead legs. The only part of my bike that I struggle to repair is I still can't true a wheel despite trying many times. Well also a broken frame

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Ah, pesky tiny ball bearings but honestly it's not so tricky, mostly patience. Also I did welding workshops so naively confident I could actually make a frame, not a good one though! I'm a bit too lazy for all that though so... now I just ride :D

    FWIW nobody should use a fixie rather than a freewheel unless they absolutely genuinely want to... because the first moment of inattention initially, being a bump on the road or just a turn they'll fall over the bike. After a few cold sweats though then it becomes automatic again, no thinking, just riding, and it's genuinely fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I'll take more complex computers over trying to get KE-Jetronic to run properly any day of the week lol

    Honestly, things have gotten easier for me with the extra computers. Usually if something electrical is wrong, there's a code for it. Can't blindly trust the code of course, but it's usually a good place to get started when doing diagnostics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Kias just a few years ago were copies of late 90s cars at a price reflecting that and low complexity making them efficient to maintain. Take a Kia now, it's just as expensive as everything else and will be scrapped in 8 years when one of the $2000 proprietary led assemblies fails.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 14 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    hugs Civic si

    you'll get all the motors and transmissions you need, widdle guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    All hail the supreme leader Trump. Yes, he maybe a pedo, rapist and multiple convicted felon, as well as a failed businessman, but he really represents the American dream........

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Unsustainable grift is unsustainable? Wow I'm shocked.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I'm told that Americans only want big expensive cars but for some reason the government felt the need to slap 100% tariffs on small inexpensive Chinese cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [+] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Car prices were on the rise long before the tarrif crap. Yes the tariffs continue to make it worse, but this was a trend already! As long as people are willing to pay 50 grand for a rav4 with leather seats they will continue to pump their numbers up. I know VERY few people that drove a car more than 10 years old, their afraid it will break down on them when the reality is their newest 700$ /mo POS techno trash on wheels will be dead long before my 87 gives up the ghost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago* (14 children)

    I have an electric golf cart that I can take on any roads 35 mph or lower, I’m saving for a lithium upgrade so I can go farther than 15 miles round trip. I had my last vehicle stolen when cars were not available at the beginning of COVID. I bought a mini van to replace it, it cost twice what I wanted to pay but I have to have a good vehicle for the family and a sedan just wasn’t realistic. Luckily insurance also paid out over twice what my stolen vehicle originally cost me because of the market at the time. I love my mini van but I usually only drive it once or twice a week, most of my daily trips are in the golf cart.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (13 children)

    Cars from the late 80s and early 90s are still fine today if produced; relatively safe, good fuel economy, air-conditioning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Civic_(fourth_generation)

    Heck, 4/5 people would be happy with a side by side ATV as a form of transportation in urban/suburban areas. https://www.utvdriver.com/utv-news/cheapest-utility-side-by-sides/

    A golf cart is suitable for at least 50% of people currently driving in cities, as the majority of small cars are just grocery getters. https://www.utvdriver.com/utv-news/cheapest-utility-side-by-sides/

    Something is fundamentally wrong with the transportation; size, power, cost of cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    The Honda fit is the best urban car I've ever driven. Street parking? No problem. I can fit a bike in the back or put my rack on for two. It seats 5 just like an suv. Great milage. Sure I wish it was electric and had android auto but otherwise it's amazing. Hell it handled a drive across the country stuffed completely full with stuff we didn't want to risk in a shipping box

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    Cars from the late 80s and early 90s are still fine today if produced;

    Unfortunately they can not even be bought used because they've all rusted through (Japanese ones anyway, others are hit and miss)

    relatively safe

    Citation needed, they're usually missing most of the new safety features, that's why they can be so small and light

    good fuel economy

    Maybe if you're in the US where diesels are the devil and everything has to be a truck. Modern cars have better fuel economy at even twice the weight. You can get similar or better highway fuel economy out of a 2.5 tonne Audi SQ7 tdi compared to a small 1 tonne 90s Honda Civic. Diesel of course helps a lot in that regard. But if a huge ass performance SUV gets similar mileage compared to a 90s ecobox, imagine what a normally sized modern car can do.

    air-conditioning

    Was by no means standard on those, at least in Europe. Be lucky to have heated seats in a 90s Japanese ecobox, AC was nearly unheard of, and wasn't standard even in the 00s.

    That's not even getting into emissions, which are the reason you don't get these cheap and simple 80s and 90s engines anymore. Now you need EGR to manage NOx, catalytic converters to manage CO2 and if it's a brand new car, even petrol engines need to have particulate filters.

    Heck, 4/5 people would be happy with a side by side ATV as a form of transportation in urban/suburban areas. https://www.utvdriver.com/utv-news/cheapest-utility-side-by-sides/

    A golf cart is suitable for at least 50% of people currently driving in cities, as the majority of small cars are just grocery getters. https://www.utvdriver.com/utv-news/cheapest-utility-side-by-sides/

    Do any of these even have proper heating? Or like how do you demist the windshield between September and April when it's too cold to drive an open vehicle and too humid to not have heating and ideally AC to reduce humidity in the car?

    They just look like nice summer toys.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    The Honda Civic has had the same fuel economy now since the late 80s https://www.fuelly.com/car/honda/civic at 30mpg The VTEC engine has been computer powered for the same time, and has used a Catalytic converter that whole time. Only now, with an electric motor for first gear, do we see any mpg improvement.

    The main safety feature, is that they gotten heavier.

    15-minute duration, covering approximately 9.3 miles at an average speed of 18.6 mph" https://en.phongnhaexplorer.com/qna/travel/what-is-the-average-distance-of-a-car-trip.html#gsc.tab=0 Most cars don't even heat up in that time, an ATV or golf cart would be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (4 children)

    The Japanese haven't actually advanced much in the automotive industry in recent decades, so I'm not surprised there.

    And yes, extra airbags, bigger crumple zones and noise insulation add weight and since.

    My 2019 C class did about 60 mpg extraurban and it's significantly bigger. 30 sounds about right for urban. Cars have gotten better. Hondas? Ehh.

    Even my diesels have started heating up the windshield in 5 minutes at most. You let it idle for 2 or 3 while removing the snow anyway. Or use webasto. Petrol engines of any real size heat up quicker so they don't usually need such things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    The only real breakthrough has been hybrid, for mpg and efficiency. I suspect internal combustion engines will be around for some time, but almost all cars will move to hybrid (hopefully plug in hybrid).

    Cars heat up quickly now because, aside from the heat from the car engine, many have small electric heaters to overcome the first few minutes of cool air in the cabin and on the windshield. But all this tech comes at an expense to cost, simplicity, and repair-ability.

    N. America really needs more public transit. Better trains between cities. Legislating pick-up trucks so they are safer to pedestrians. Allowing smaller companies to manufacturer cars, to break up the monopolies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Direct injection becoming commonplace has done a lot too, espegially with piezoelectric injectors that can do multiple injection events per combustion cycle for diesel. Modern transmissions have more speeds, quicker shifts and less efficiency loss with fewer moving parts.

    Hybrid in comparison doesn't do much for mpg unless it's plugin hybrid which of course can be a true game changer.

    Resistive heaters aren't particularly fancy or expensive tech, but that's irrelevant, 90s cars also heat up fast (since the engine thermal efficiency is usually worse), I'm more interested in the UTV comparison here since you literally can't drive without heat here half the year.

    Agreed on the transit. But is there any real need for new car manufacturers? It's very expensive to get started with a new one.

    There's exactly one thing America needs to get smaller and cheaper cars. Proper taxation on fuel. Right now there's no incentive to sell cheap small cars if everyone wants a brodozer and crossovers are seen as tiny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Proper taxation on fuel might help.

    One massive problem is all the advertising of pickup trucks and muscle cars ... advertising works. So many people can only see themselves needing and driving a large pickup/suv or a Dodge Charger.

    I'd like to see an advertising campaign for medium sized sedans pulling utility trailers ... as being macho. It shocking how few people use utility trailers, they are not a thing in N. America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    North America needs wagons back. Diesel especially. It's all I drive anymore.

    Imagine this, you've got 5 people in the car, a full boot and a trailer. You're still getting 30 mpg on the highway. That's a diesel wagon for you. Sedan body size with slightly more cargo space.

    And the ad could be that an empty truck pulls into the fuel station twice as many times on the same journey as the loaded wagon with its trailer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    Citation needed,

    Physics. Force = mass X acceleration. Heavier vehicles are harder to turn, harder to stop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Modern cars run wider tires and have better brakes, also ESP works some serious magic. Stopping distance is actually better than it used to be for most vehicles. Also suspension setups are more advanced, meaning tires are actually touching ground more of the time. This makes cornering better.

    Then add airbags (not really a thing in a lot of late 80s and early 90s cars), real crumple zones, etc.

    Barring stupid ass American trucks with zero visibility, vehicles have gotten safer over time. It's slowed down now, but still getting slightly better with driver assistance features, like blind spot detection, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    In urban environments an old 1980s car is fine, you can't really get into a high speed collision in a city.

    Highway driving is statistically safer, so you can get away with a 1980s car on a highway.

    Rural driving is o.k.-ish, if you are away of your surroundings on a rural road.

    It's the sub-urban, specifically, the ex-urban environment in N.America that posses the most problems for driving an older 1980s car with limited safety features. People really speed on the wide, 6 to 8 lane, suburban streets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Highway driving is actually where things like ESP and airbags matter most IMO. ESP can save your ass on unexpected black ice in a curve and airbags can save your ass when some oncoming assface decides to fall asleep and drift into your lane. Most highways in my country are not separated, so that's pretty dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    A golf cart is suitable for at least 50% of people currently driving in cities, as the majority of small cars are just grocery getters.

    A signficant portion of Florida uses Golf carts in closed communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›