top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 10 months ago

That's a religiousism term for shit stain

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Just keep him away from the Pope. Dude has a record.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    Wow, an op-ed. Basically a long form Lemmy comment. Wake me up when someone's doing something more impactful than having an opinion. Everybody has opinions.

  • source
  • 50 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 129 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    JD Vance is so unlikeable that it killed Pope Francis.

    Never forget.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Still not as big of a stain as the one he left on Erika Kirk's couch last night!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    He should be excommunicated.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago

    I saw the video of Vance berating Good and fanning the flames of the fire. The way he speaks appears strong to people who can't think for themselves, and who lack their own moral compass. Truly a nation of weak, heartless automotons we've found ourselves amongst.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Shocker, the man that murdered the Pope isn't a very good Christian. Who'd have guessed?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You can't be apart of the Trump administration and not have moral failings. They even make you prove from time to time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    JD Vance has no chance.

    Shit stained soul and shit stained pants.

    “The vice president’s comments justifying the death of Renee Good are a moral stain on the collective witness of our Catholic faith. His repeated attempts to blame Good for her own death are fundamentally incompatible with the Gospel.

    How appropriate JD Vance would attempt to make such a shitty legal and moral argument. I wonder who God would side with in the case of Good vs Evil.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Considering there hasnt been a rain of brimstone, or assholes turning to pillars of salt, or anything else of the sort.. Suggests that, if a god so did exist, he absolutely does not care about their actions at the very best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I mean to each their own, but if you do believe in a God, you might also view this through the lens of most historical and religious texts being full of very similar stories. Seemingly undefeatable evil and oppressive rulers and empires, reigning supreme over large numbers of people for generations until the day they just suddenly didn't.

    For me personally, it has actually kind of rekindled and helped me better understand my own faith, and I've stumbled across numerous passages in the bible that almost seem to be warning about this exact scenario. False prophets, hypocrisy, and men who use their positions of power and influence to spread a false message in the name of Jesus to deceive oppressed people, keep them from resisting oppression, and gaslight them into believing their oppression is a necessary part of God's larger plan. As if the oppressors were actually chosen by God to commit these horrific acts, and anyone who isn't loyal to their leadership somehow also isn't being loyal to God.

    That dumbass Pete Hegseth actually recently quoted one of those warnings (Matthew 10:34) in an attempt to claim his thirst for destruction and violence is simply a manifestation of Jesus acting through him to spread his message... Except, he missed the entire point of the passage he quoted by about a million fucking miles.

    When Jesus says he brings a message of the sword not one of peace, he's using a metaphor to describe the divisiveness of the message (the sword) he preached. When you read the entire passage in context, then try to depict Jesus as a violent warrior with a sword ready to go to war, you're literally arguing that Jesus was telling people to kill anyone that disagrees with them including their own parents... If that doesn't sound like something Jesus would say, it's because he definitely wasn't trying to say that. Like many parts of the Bible and other ancient texts, it was obviously a figure of speech. He was explaining that the true message of Christianity can often be a divisive one, even for the people you consider your closest friends and family.

    "The sword Jesus brings is not here military conflict, but, as vv. 35–36 show, a sharp social division which even severs the closest family ties. … Jesus speaks here, as in the preceding and following verses, more of a division in men’s personal response to him."

    When we hear this blasphemous messages this administration is spreading, like the idea of "toxic empathy," as a justification for tearing immigrant families apart by kidnapping, detaining, and often deporting them to places they fled while seeking asylum, just to flaunt their disregard for human life. Actively protecting wealthy pedophiles and rapists from justice, while publicly celebrating the attack and invasion of smaller and weaker sovereign country to kidnap a dictator and his wife, and put them on trial in the U.S., while the administration is continuing to violate habeas corpus for millions who have been detained in immigration sweeps in the U.S. Seizure of what resources that smaller country does have simply to make some of the most wealthy American corporations even more wealthy by giving them a larger share of the huge profits they were already making, yet still refusing to provide healthcare, housing, and other basic needs to Americans citizens. Now they're literally trying to justify the murder of a mother who made the fatal mistake of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and not bowing before the mighty army of the King when they invaded her home while welding their "absolute immunity" (not to mention the monetization of all of these fucked up messages and policies via constant exploitation of a religion they seem to care nothing about). We quite literally (not metaphorically) are all collectively witnessing how hard a pill to swallow Christianity actually is for the people who profit in his name while openly refusing to respect or follow the word of Christ.

    Sorry for beating a dead horse, but these cowardly fascists hiding behind Christianity to spread their hate gets me a bit riled up. Even if you didn't grow up from birth to 18 immersed in the often dark and hypocritical world of southern evangelical Christianity, (then come out the other side very jaded only to realize that in spite of everything they tried to brainwash you into believing, your faith was never lost, it was what was guiding you to resist the whole time), you probably still understand that Jesus would be fucking pissed and flipping tables if he caught a glimpse of One America or Fox News right now, just like anyone with a shred of decency and critical thinking skills should be.

    The passage Hegseth chose to quote as "secretary of war," is actually particularly relevant when it comes to contrasting the hypocrisy of the Christian Nationalist movement with what Jesus actually says in the same book (The Greatest Commandment Matthew 22:35-40), are the 2 most important commandments to remember and follow even if you take away nothing else from the Bible (practicing empathy and loving your neighbor as a sign of your own love and respect for God and his creations).

    Tldr: Hegseth quoted what he thought sounded like a badass hypermasc message of Jesus advocating war, not realizing he's actually who Jesus was trying to warn you about in the passage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    First I thought, wouldn't it be Good vs. Ross? Then I realized you didn't mean to refer to her last name in this case. I kind of like the thought of using her last name to play up the comparison, regardless!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    They should bring back excommunication just for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Excommunication is still a thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    When was the last time somebody was excommunicated? Did they deserve it as much as he does?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It's not everyday you get an opportunity to have your name put on a wikipedia page with people from the 1st century...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Also for a while being excommunicated could earn you a painting, which is kind of neat, but was probably less neat if you got burned at the stake. Unless you really had being painted as a goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    We Catholics take a lot of well earned crap for a lot of people for a lot of things we did over the millennia.

    But people often forget that a not insignificant percentage of Saints became saints being murdered for standing up to the church for the dumb shit they were pushing.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    As a Catholic, Vance knows better than to peddle this brand of gaslighting and agitation

    I really fucking doubt he does. Being Christian is just an aesthetic for these people. I kind of hope their God is real, just so they can burn in hell.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    He's claiming to be Catholic, though, not just a garden-variety American Christian (which could be anything, really). This article seems to ask why he even calls himself specifically Catholic if he's going to espouse these views and engage in this kind of behavior. I see two major possibilities:

    • he doesn't know what Catholicism is, and is just pretending to be Catholic for political favor
    • he does know what Catholicism is, and is trying to fuck with it

    All modern presidents/VPs have claimed to be "Christian" -- it's basically an unofficial job requirement at this point. So why not just generically claim to be Christian (like Trump does). Instead he claims to be Catholic, but clearly is not lol. So something is not being said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    A lot of Catholics seem to consider themselves the "uber-Christians", with the whole Pope thing being their religious king, such as it were.

    And the ones like that are absolutely terrible at actually following the lessons of their religion too. Now they've got a new "king" so I guess the Pope doesn't matter as much

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    He did kill a pope.... have we forgotten that?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Punchable face.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Moral stain? More like a shit stain.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    The writer says "Vance knows that only God can take life."

    That means that God took the victim's life, not the ICE officer.

    Such a goofy religion. Fortunately, it's TAX FREE, so we all can pay for it! Yay!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    This is America. Everything is tax free if you're wealthy enough.

    You get all kinds of breaks on taxes, interest, random fees, and other costs as a reward for already having money. Because why would you give a break to somebody who actually needs it?

    If there's any chance you could conceivably use a tax break or extra income to potentially improve your standard of living, these fascist try to convince you it would be taking away your dignity to not pick you up by your ankles, turn your pockets inside out, and shake you until they've made sure they've gotten every fucking penny.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Vance should have began and ended as a cum stain. The same goes for mango mussolini.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    They took until now to notice what he is? My goodness, don't they have eyes and ears in the US?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Well no, as the article says he's already been admonished by two popes but if he's going to keep doing heinous stuff while claiming to be catholic they've sort of got to keep calling him out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    "JD" "Vance", Taco, the Republicans, and the entire conservative movement are a skidmark on this country.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    This administration must really despise the 1st amendment.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Our only recourse is to pray for his conversion of heart.”

    Thoughts and prayers.

    What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does itprofit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.

    Talk is cheap. Walk the walk.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Certainly is responsible for a lot of upholstery stains

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Gotta try hard to out-shitstain the Catholic Church. JD might manage it, but it'll be an uphill battle.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Couch fucker can’t even get the church on his side… embarrassing. He should just go back to fucking couches and Kirk’s widow! Oh I forgot… buying eyeliner at Walgreens! Hahaha! Douche!

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago

    Virtue signalling. If it's in their interest the Catholic church would fall in line in the blink of an eye.

  • source