Only the government could spend 20 years creating a national ID that no one wanted and that apparently doesn't even work as a national ID.

But that's what the federal government has accomplished with the REAL ID, which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now considers unreliable, even though getting one requires providing proof of citizenship or lawful status in the country.

In a December 11 court filing, Philip Lavoie, the acting assistant special agent in charge of DHS' Mobile, Alabama, office, stated that, "REAL ID can be unreliable to confirm U.S. citizenship."

all 68 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 131 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"just one more flaming hoop, we promise!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    At least as long as there’s flaming hoops, they’re still expecting people to be able to jump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago*

    It doesn't work like that.

    We're not supposed to be able to jump through the flaming hoops.

    They're too far apart, too narrow, they keep moving, and we're forced to wear a blindfold.

    We're supposed to get burnt.

    Meanwhile, “the right kind of people” don't have to jump through the hoops, and laugh while watching us burn, without realising that the definition of “right kind of people” keeps getting more and more narrow, and that soon it might be them getting broiled on the hoops.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 104 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Still don't have my REAL ID, I have my passport. Zero reason to get one until I'm forced to in 2028 when I renew.

    Personally at this point I think passports should be free for every US Citizen to get, or at least the card one.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah pretty sure the real point they're saying this now is so that ICE can black bag people with a real ID not carrying their passport. Only a matter of time until that can't be verified too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Oh for sure, no doubt about that. Just like the post office date marking on mail being changed. It's all bullshit the Trump administration is trying to get away with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    You have to love that the only hand Trump and his administration have to play is "we are too incompetent." Run the country into the ground and then do your evil acts with no government to stop them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I didn't think anyone is forced to get real id. Are they? I though it was always optional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    There was a pretty active intimidation campaign in NY for a few years. No RealID? You can't travel, can't cross the border (Canada) can't fly etc etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 10 months ago

    Fascists will always contrive some arbitrary rationalization to do whatever the fuck they want to do with you. They have no allegiance to truth, logic or consistency.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago*

    So is a passport.

    Birth certificate? Straight to jail

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    So, what can be used to confirm citizenship, DHS?

    inb4 "nothing"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Why did I go through this bullshit? Enough will never be enough in the bipartisan police state.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Then why did I just spend $85 to get this ID just to get on a fucking plane?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    This admin just lives to make asses of themselves trying to have everything both ways.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago*
    [–] 20 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    There have already been cases where ICE has disregarded Passports. They really don't care what if you're a citizen, so they don't really care if you have proof of citizenship.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago

    In a December 11 court filing, Philip Lavoie, the acting assistant special agent in charge of DHS' Mobile, Alabama, office, stated that, "REAL ID can be unreliable to confirm U.S. citizenship."

    That's not how the government sold Real ID to us when they created it. The whole point of Real ID was to provide an alternate way to confirm your citizenship and/or identity without requiring you to carrying your passport on you all the time.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    "This brown person has REAL ID, it must not work"

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Are we sure Philip Lavoie is a citizen? Sounds French, let's deport him to El Salvador.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago*

    I'm sure none of these assholes had to stand in line at the DMV with a stack of papers to get their REAL ID. Eat a bag of dicks. And of course this is coming from Alabama, can we just get rid of the fucking south already? I'm so done, they can have their BIble land or whatever, just leave the rest of us in peace.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    I have been unable to get a real id because when I was 8 my parents changed my name. Then when I lived in Maryland there refused to issue an ID using my now legal name. When I moved back to my home state of New Mexico my id used my birth name as it was on my Maryland id. Now I have half my stuff using my birth name, half using my legal name, cannot get a real id.

    This year I plan to change my legal name back to my birth name... or maybe something totally different.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    To be fair, REAL ID was never meant to give citizenship. Its purpose is identity and lawful presence. I have friends here on visas. They're obviously not citizens, but also they're here legally and have REAL IDs.

    For this same reason, people trying to say proof of citizenship to vote is no big deal because everyone has a REAL ID is full of shit in multiple ways.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    * proof of citizenship or lawful presence. Which is supposed to be indicated on the card. Which is supposed to be validated by DHS.

    One of the ways REAL ID doesn't matter for voting is that putting a ballot in a box is only the very first step in counting a vote, and there are multiple checks whether it's valid and from person that is allowed to vote afterwards. After several centuries of practice paper voting is pretty thoroughly stress tested. Even if most people have no idea how.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Where does it show citizenship? I think the part you quoted may mean "proof of citizenship or [other means of] lawful presence"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    At least in my state, it explicitly means proof of citizenship. Permanent residents have a slightly different ID. The documents required to get one are what you would use to prove citizenship. Passport, birth certificate, etc. and it's all verified by relevant agencies. That's kind of the whole point.

    Frankly even if they're "just" lawfully present and that's not differentiated on the ID, that should be enough reason for DHS to not detain them if any remotely reasonable policy were being followed instead of rounding up people based on skin color.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Is that slightly different ID not REAL compliant? If your state decided to make a citizenship determination when issuing some kind of ID, fine, but I don't think that's part of the requirements by DHS so I would still say the title is a bit misleading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    The slightly different ID is REAL ID, not just REAL compliant. It looks like it's similar to how, in my country, driving licenses are coloured differently depending on whether you've passed your driving test; A learner's provision driving license is green, and when you pass your test, you get a pink one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago

    Right, REAL is basically a set of compliance requirements for issuance. My point is that states can do their own thing for the most part regarding their identifications, like driving restrictions and documents that would, in theory, prove citizenship... If that were in the jurisdiction of the state government. It's determined at the federal level, and while federal regulations determine REAL compliance, those same compliance requirements don't require citizenship. So there is a gap to say REAL ID -> proof of citizenship

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    Anything to hurt immigrants under trump.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    That comment section went off the fucking rails.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Sphincter print ID'S coming in 2026

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    ... That reminds me I should probably get my car tabs renewed

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Eat a bag of ducks and run the ID. Yes its not tied to citizenship. But legal status.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    So ridiculous since that was the whole fucking point.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Why am I not surprised that the government is inept.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    WTF?!?! The Real ID and US Passports do not mean shit in the USA. Fakes! Every single one of them

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    Edit: sorry got Real ID mixed up with ID.me

    This is bullshit, and clearly they don't care if you have documentation or not, they jsut want to harass brown people.

  • source
  • [+] -22 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago

    Roughly 17,000 CA CDLs with incorrect expirations were issued

    So "roughly" 0.094% of all cards issued as of spring 2025. That's barely a rounding error.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    Literally every document can be faked. Passport? Fake. Birth certificate? Fake. The supposed point of REAL ID was to be a reliable document. You can fly with one, but if a Temu Nazi making a "targeted" random stop says it's a worthless piece of plastic you lose an hour of your life. For living your life in your home country after doing everything the government asked. If the organization who certifies the IDs won't accept them, why did we go through the effort of making a national ID system that verified lawful status?

    And if this was a case about California ID, maybe their fuck up would be relevant, but this is a filling for a case where a US citizen with an Alabama ID was detained.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    The license California offers undocumented drivers is specifically not a Real ID and cannot be used in place of one or to acquire a Real ID. Incorrect expiration dates on these licenses have no effect on the reliability of a Real ID and is a separate issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Tl;dr: slight right bias, but generally factual reporting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Except that mediabiasfactcheck is wont to be bullshit, underestimating right-leaning and using bullshit reasons to downgrade reliability of many sources to equivocate about the unreliability of conservative propaganda sources.

    It's possible that this is a fair assessment, but I certainly wouldn't take MBFC's word for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, this. MBFC seems to be very much the "American normie" take on what the actual spectrum is. For instance, they have Wonkette and MSNC as being biased to the left.

    They have them not much different from Counterpunch, LOL.

    MSNBC (MS Now, lol) is rated at -6.4 to the left. Wonkette is -8.0, Counterpunch doesn't have a number, but shows up between Extreme and Left on their little arrow.

    I mean, WTF, MSNBC? Is this the show that has - {searches} - 4 hours every morning, being hosted by a Republican? That MSNBC? Strongly biased, to the left?

  • source
  • parent
  • 14 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 77 points 10 months ago

    Venegas was detained twice in May and June during immigration raids on private construction sites, despite being a U.S.

    And in both instances officers allegedly retrieved Venegas' Alabama-issued REAL ID from his pocket but claimed it could be fake

    Probably trying to use Real ID as a scapegoat. The real problem is the “papers please” racists / authoritarian round ups.

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 10 months ago

    The REAL ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005, enacted the 9/11 Commission’s recommendation that the Federal Government “set standards for the issuance of sources of identification, such as driver's licenses and identification cards.” The Act and implementing regulations establish minimum security standards for license issuance and production and prohibit federal agencies from accepting for certain official purposes noncompliant driver’s licenses and identification cards, both physical and digital (also known as Mobile Driver’s Licenses, or “mDLs”).

    The official purposes covered by the Act and regulations are:

    Accessing certain federal facilities; Boarding Federally regulated commercial aircraft; and Entering nuclear power plants.

    So Real ID was designed to be good enough for people to use to enter a nuclear power plant, but apparently not reliable enough to identify someone to confirm citizenship? Sounds like some racist bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 10 months ago

    the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now considers unreliable, even though getting one requires providing proof of citizenship or lawful status in the country.

    Translation: they found people they don't like that have these, so argue must be flawed.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    To no one's surprise.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I lost my real ID and had to replace it last month. I brought my passport, assuming that was good enough to prove who I am, and the dmv website said that is an acceptable document.

    They wouldn't accept my fucking passport as proof of citizenship or anything else at the counter. This is after scanning my face to make sure it matched the photo on my lost ID lmao. I had to do the Karen thing and ask for a manager

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Almost like it's too complicated to be solved on the street during random stops...

    Side note:

    Next round of IDs can we stop putting addresses on there?

    If a cop needs to know your address, they can view that when scanning it. It doesn't need to be printed on there for anybody to see. And most people rent and don't update anyways.

    Even DOB too, just have a pass/fail for 21. No one needs your exact date of birth.

    It's crazy we put all that info on there.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Where I come from we don't have addresses on IDs - you'd have to replace them any time you move.

    Then I got in (mild) trouble with German police because i didn't. I had honestly never seen one that had it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Gotta get all them irises into a database so the grunts can scan you on-site. Maybe use an orb or something to do the scan and give people some crypto in exchange.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I find it both sad and funny the very bastards scared of "microchips under the skin" have voted into power this fucking regime paid by techbros wanting every piece of millions of Americans under their fiefdoms.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    So Real ID is more expensive, and harder to get. And required. And vetted by this agency. And you're telling me that it's still not enough to prove that you're residing in the US legally? GTFOH. I hope the entire American Public sues the government over this. Because seriously. What the fuck?

  • source