@ekZepp For me, it's Debian. It always just works.
post
There is no one reliable distro. Mint, itself is based off Ubuntu and also releases LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition).
If reliablility is measured in terms of how stable a distro is, then likely Debian with it's conservative approach to packaging updates comes to mind (No wonder large number of distros are based off Debian only).
I would even argue as long as someone isn't messing with a niche distro such as KDE Neon( meant to showcase KDE packages) or Linuxfx (or whatever it has renamed itself to, one of the few shady ones IMO ) or Trisquel OS (a GNU certified distro where running into dependency hell isn't new); it will suit user's case.
Debian, Slackware, Void, Zorin, even rolling release like Arch (basically any one that meets the user's use case is reliable)
I would even argue as long as someone isnβt messing with a niche distro such as KDE Neon
KDE Neon is dead because its developers found out that putting an add-on repository on top of Ubuntu is not reliable at all. That's why KDE Linux is now in development.
Is there a writeup about their problems with Ubuntu? Adding repositories to Debian and/or Ubuntu is how plenty of software is distributed, so I'm surprised to hear they're unhappy with it.
I used Neon for a while, discovered that KDE were letting it go, and switched to Kubuntu. I love Kubuntu.
Kubuntu comes with mandatory Ubuntu enshittification, though. All official Ubuntu flavors do.
I mean, yeah, sure. But I like it.
Other than snaps, what else are they doing wrong?
Other than snaps, what else are they doing wrong?
That link comes up with an error. Do you know which software it is that is/was in the universe repo?
That link comes up with an error.
Probably because you use a client that tries to open the link locally. OP deleted the post and that's why Lemmy cannot open its comments any longer, hence the Mastodon link that works fine in a web browser.
Do you know which software it is that is/was in the universe repo?
Pretty much everything except the base OS and Gnome.
Went back to Mint a few times but ultimately I like Plasma over Cinnamon, so Debian it is!
You do know that you don't have to change distros to change DE right?
Yep. I was using Plasma on Mint for a while but the consensus was youβre best off using a DE officially supported by the distro.
Never encountered any issues personally up to that point, but seemed to be the majority opinion when I researched it.
But my most recent switch was from Endeavour, so made much more sense to install Debian 13 than to Install Mint and then immediately switch DE.
Willingly switching from Arch to Debian says a lot about a person
Well, context is everything. Obviously thereβs no single best distro for all use cases.
This is a 13 year old MacBook Pro, with ancient Linux-hating hybrid Nvidia/Intel graphics that needs an NVRAM modification and vga_switcheroo to do things like video acceleration properly.
And not my main computer, just for learning Linux and playing some old games.
So Endeavour worked great, but seemed like ultimately a computer that old is probably best off with stability and minimal updates rather than being bleeding-edge and subjecting it to gigabytes of updates each week.
I absolutely loved the release of LMDE, it's just what I like though, the simple intuitive interface of Mint, without dealing with Canonical's bullshit (really sour about snaps, ignore me lol).
Edit: picked back up my phone and reread what was on the screen when I realized you probably meant desktop environment and not Debian Edition when you typed DE.
I never left!
I think I'm just old enough, have fiddled with my PC enough times in the past, have enough other shit to do, and get enough coding and troubleshooting experience at work that I look at the quest to find my spirit distro and think "that's a youngster's game."
Or, you know, maybe Mint is already my spirit distro and I am experienced enough to not fix what isn't broken!
Ah that explains it, I no longer understand a single thing about computers or what people do with them anymore. You've explained it perfectly.
And here's the thing: I don't even want to know. It's not like I'm trying to understand but can't, I just don't care. I don't get it.
People with 100TB home servers, people with 3D printers and boxes filled with trash, endless upgrades for no visible change, etc
I don't have a single need or want that ends with "I need a new computer".
I completely understand the sentiment!
I am still into some tech and "new computer" type stuff. I am about to install a bigger/faster drive in my PC and set up my Home Assistant server. That PC is already my Jellyfin server. I am also in the middle of building a brand new PC for my kid, which will also run Mint, lol.
But I spend time only on the things that I've learned really matter to me, and not on all the things you're "supposed to" mess with in your home lab that you obviously have.
You know the meme (or meme category) where it's a resume or linkedin profile where the recent work history goes something like Senior Network Architect, then Goose Farmer?
I may literally have a 3D printer still in the box, and PC & networking parts all over the house, but my daily routine is embedded linux C/C++ sr developer by day and animal tender on the evenings and weekends, lol.
Why bother with distro hopping when you can desktop hop?Β
I hopped from Debian to Manjaro and kept KDE Plasma. Main reason: Debian is stable, but I had to wait too long for some updates.
Some reasons
- Package availability
- Preconfiguration curiosity
- Features (e.g. USE flags, different inits, musl, package manager speed, newness vs stability, different core utils, etc)
- Reliability
- Education
- Community
But yeah... It's a mite silly to be distro-hopping just to try different desktop environments.
Methinks several still-new users are yet to realise the desktop environment and distro are not tied together, and nearly all distros offer nearly all desktop environments to install, just one command away.
It gets even more fun when exploring all the window managers, not just the few desktop environments. And... there be ways to ease that exploration even further.
Yup, I do regular distrofuckery on my spare pc but Mint is just a rock solid option for me, great distro, feels good.
Just switched from Mint to CachyOS due to some upgraded hardware and it's been pretty nice so far. Mint will stay on all my other devices though.
Mint forever, Ubuntu without the snaps, and It generally is fuss free.
Shout-out to antiX though, revived many a "useless" old laptop with that.
I've been living with fedora (ultramarine) kde for a while now because people praised fedora so much, but i think mint still wins. and i chose ultramarine because am a noob, don't sue me.
there are many little things that just don't work and i seriously can't figure out. here's a few: discover fails to update the system and i always have to do it manually from the terminal. wine is broken, it literally can't run anything i throw at it that worked on mint. plasma theme customization is somewhat broken (also custom themes prevent updating...). using alt key in games run with wine causes some annoying notification sound (not in system keyboard shortcuts). often keyboard leds stay on when system suspended, system can't be woken up from keyboard. can't use flameshot with kb shortcut.
this isn't a hate comment though, a lot of things are better than i had with mint cinnamon. i do like how it's a lot faster than mint when under heavy load, autosuspend actually works, no issues with screen not waking up. currently my media pc with mint can't update because all sources are unavailable and it has some conflict with python3 which it won't let me uninstall (which i suspect would be unwise, idk)
From the bottom of my heart fuck rolling releases. Never worked for me (nobody get worked up please, ymmv).
Kinoite Ride or die
FOR ME it does the things I need it to do; and it works; and hasnβt blown up my house yet so π€
Limewire?
Here is my distrohopping journey: Mint -> Arco -> Debian -> KDE Neon -> Artix -> Void -> NixOS -> Fedora -> Void
I'm surprised you didn't stick with NixOS. After spending tens of hours learning how to use it, the sunk cost fallacy is strong.
I had already converted my home manager configuration into normal config files and was using Home Manager just to manage symlinks.
I was using Nix for system configuration but that doesn't mean that I forgot how to set up a Linux system by more conventional methods (it's like learning how to ride a bike). While I do like the declarative aspect, doing everything in one language didn't appeal anymore after over a year of using NixOS...
Also, I wanted a package manager that told me what packages would be updated, and which let me search packages from the command line easily... Nix didn't provide that and it was annoying me.
I do miss flake.nix or shell.nix files and Nix shells though. But XBPS (Void's package manager) has its fair share of cool things as well and seems easier to understand, which is a bonus.
Just delete the configuration.nix file along with all backups of it and its easy to not look back. At least that did it for me since my system needed specific boot settings to even work and relearning all that wasn't worth it.
An OS should GTFO and let you get on with the business of doing shit on your computer, Linux Mint does that nicely. π§
except it doesn't. Fixed release model quite easily gets in a way of doing shit. Need to add a PPA into config for each separate package you need the latest release of, or simply because the package itself is absent in the normal repo doesn't help either. And don't get me started on troubleshooting after "doing shit".
Something like fedora does a much better job if you prefer fixed release, but if you like to experiment and "do shit", arch derivatives like Endeavor or Cachy are just better suited for you. All of the above also have a much nicer documentation than Mint.
For most people, especially those who want to migrate from other OS, micromanaging package versions is not part of doing shit.
well, it apparently was an issue for me on Mint, when i just switched from windows.
I might misremember things, but i believe some Microsoft stuff was inside PPA, so for someone just switching from windows it's actually more likely to delve into the apt fuckery.
Noob distro btw
Well, I switched to Linux to get away from Microsoft bullshit so I never tried installing any of their stuff but I can see that being an issue for some people.
I also had the same experience with Mint having outdated packages. And at that time I was a Linux noob so I figured I'd just wait until Mint updated their shit.
Well days turned into weeks and then about 3 months later, still with no updates from Mint, I jumped ship to Fedora. Which Fedora was nice but then I hopped to Kubuntu and now I'm on CachyOS.
I see all of this Mint hype and while I do love Cinnamon; I would never put Mint on my own devices going forward. It's definitely a distro I would put on my mom's laptop or a grandparent's device. But their release schedule is abhorrent.
+1 for Fedora being the best distro for getitng out of your way so you can get on with doing stuff.
I mean, literally Linus himself runs Fedora for this very reason.
Only because it's easier and faster to install new kernels with. Otherwise, I suspect he doesn't much care about gaming or other more "normal uses."
Didn't he recently switch to something else? I forget what. Maybe I'm misremembering.
Didn't hear about it, at least recently when Linus Torvals came to Linus Sebastian (aka Linus Tech Tips), they were still discussing Fedora
In the context of the comment, "do shit" is explicitly not anything to do with the OS or packages or repos.
Apparently, itβs dangerous to mention Archβ but Iβd dare to do just that!
Unironically my most headache-free Linux experience in 10+ years. The handful of times an update doesn't go through you just need to visit the homepage and follow the manual intervention steps outlined in the announcement.
At least, once I freed myself from Nvidia x)
I know CachyOS, at least, shows recent Arch announcements during the update process before installing anything. Unfortunately there's been a recurring DDoS attack on Arch's servers for months, so this check tends to fail and you aren't always notified of breaking changes.
I cannot count the number of times Debian Upgrade broke on me. My memory tells me I had issues with all upgrades (on various machines with mostly defaults) since Debian 8. Itβs 13 now. I did follow the correct upgrade process and quite familiar with it, yet every single time I had issues at least for some of the desktops of my elder relatives and friends that I managed. Arch was just stable. And manual intervention is usually needed only if you have this particular thing installed. So, quite seldom. For servers, I think that was much better for me, but now Iβm either Arch or Fedora (for situations where I donβt bother with setting my personal environment).
For when you want the Ubuntu of Ubuntu as opposed to the Ubuntu of Debian.
Fedora for life.
After testing LM with Cinnamon, and a ubuntu based distribution with KDE⦠KDE is just better.
What are some things you preferred in KDE over Cinnamon? I haven't explored KDE much.
The interface looks more recent. Also I can use Wayland, as X11 can be a pain with scaling or specific setups
Apart from that, there are good default apps (although you can download KDE's stuff anyways), KDE is pretty transparent as an organization. Things like notifications are more sexy than cinnamon. Built in options like Win+P showing screen display works just like windows
Good animations, a good range of default widgets and taskbar config for my needs (itβs pretty limited imo but itβs enough for me)
Terminal is great but I got some problems like .sh scripts not showing a window but just running in background when double clicked. Apart from that, Kate (default editor), Konsole (terminal) are well built
They also have built in support for Nextcloud sync icons in the file browser, which is nice
I prefer the update manager of Mint but no big deal (canβt update only one package in KDE's GUI)
Things like managing battery and connecting to Bluetooth devices is beautiful. Everything feels premium, fast, sleek.
this. im so sick of everyone just telling new people to get mint. cinnamon isnt the best choice for every new person. i hate that its just told to every new person, point blank.
Is it KDE Neon? I've been curious if it's any good, haven't tried. It's just Ubuntu LTS with Plasma.
kde neon is their testbed I believe, but there are other distros shipping it too.
opensuse leap and thumbleweed defaults to installing kde plasma. leap is the slower moving version, thumbleweed is the bleeding edge rolling release distro, if you want to try it.
fedora has a kde edition, that too seems to be stable, maybe its more polished too
Neon is great, but don't use it for mission critical stuff. I've had updates brick my system before because it's bleeding edge for KDE.
It isnβt! I used TuxedoOS.
The main reason was that I have a tuxedo laptop, but they also adopted the same moves as mint: mirrored Ubuntuβs repos for privacy, and disabled snap by default. Also, moved ping/internet connectivity check to their own server.
I do believe the packages are a bit outdated but same problem on Mint
I think KDE Neon is more up to date with the packages but still use the default servers, so Canonical gets some of your pings
Btw tuxedo should work just fine on a non-tuxedo device. The custom optimizations should stay disabled
Also, as others have talked about it, itβs not bleeding edge KDE but stable KDE, but itβs a recent version so the desktop environment feels modern
Sorry for the slow response, I was busy
Neckbeard here. I run Arch btw.
top 95 comments