I totally agree. It felt like it was an arbitrary ruling to keep the number of memorable celestial bodies low.
I actually like the idea of PMOs being defined as planets but it also sounds like there's too much disagreement for any resolutions on this topic.
That's the mindset we started with but things have shifted to what we're seeing now and people are being forced to use it in many cases.
Option 4: the bridge between materialism and panpsychism
True! I forgot about that.
I figured they meant technologically mitigated but you're right they could've meant legally litigated.
"Mitigated", but yes, that's a good point. I'm sure it was put through its paces there.
Exactly. If they aren't a Fetterman, then vote for them no matter what.
The only way voting will be ever be effective again is if we shift the Overton window back. The only way to do that (in regards to voting) is to vote for leftists at the local and state level. The ones that actually win are running under the Democrat banner.
That's pretty much the only way we get out of this mess democratically speaking. That said, we do need to be doing more than just voting to have any actual chance.
If you run Android, check out "Energize" on fdroid.
According to Wikipedia, honey does have anti-bacterial properties but can also cause allegic reactions depending on the immune system.
I'm thinking it could loosely help with inflammatory responses, maybe? But that may be a stretch and it's definitely a case by case basis regardless.
Because there is nothing special about them as an individual. I'd imagine they surround themselves with money to prop up their self-worth because people wouldn't pay attention to them otherwise. They are about as important as anyone else that isn't good at anything but much more significant because they have wealth. And they realize that.
So, what you're saying is... no. Gotcha.
A broken clock is right twice a day too!