I plan on celebrating that illustrious day, but I do think we need to temper expectations a bit. I am truly not convinced it will actually change much. Trump is a symptom not the mastermind.

it won't solve our problems though.

imma get so smashed on soju yall dont even knowww

It fear it will be the same as with Charlie Kirk. A very loud minority along with an army of AI social media users will agressively threaten anyone who says that the death was not a huge loss.

Yeah, just imagine if one of the early assassination attempts on Hitler worked. Same vibes.

I do wonder how many of those we may be seeing...

If Republicans and centrists and some so-called leftists and liberals clutch their pearls over it - first of all, FUCK THEM. But, secondly, remind them that the conservatives are the ones that raised the flags for Donvict's inauguration even though Carter was being remembered by having flags at half-mast just prior.

This is the party that lowered flags for that POS of Charlie Kirk. Some people just don't deserve this honor.

I'm just going to do a Grumpy Cat "Good." and completely forget his ass. It's what he deserves, as the most important thing to him is his name and ego. Fuck him.

He lacks everything that made trump president, the first thing the fact that he is not trump. MAGA is a cult of personality, they worship trump. The couch-fucker is way behind trump in the maga likeability. He does not move masses as the child rapist does. He will become president, yes, but the maga cult will implode and they will enjoy a civil war in their own party for that.

You're forgetting that Vance will become president. He might be even worse.

Given that the same puppeteers have their hands up Vance's ass, that and Vance is not an incontinent geriatric moron, he could be much worse.

Preferably one with bars and a strict dress code.

if by home you mean prison

The hand or the arm are specifically cited as where to place the IV for this class of drugs (at least in the material I've been able to read). It also explains the 3 month cycle (ish) of MRI's, which is called for because this class of drugs increases potential for brain damage (hence the MRI's).

I'm 70, in great health, I exercise regularly and have a healthy diet. Even with all that, when I had surgery recently that required general anesthetic, I came home with a massive hematoma on the back of my hand as a souvenir of a less-than-optimally-placed IV cannula.

Someone has a case of the Mondays.

Fuckin’ A

"I think if I had a million dollars I could hook that up."

i helped my uncle jack off a horse, yeah

I believe that there is nothing Donald Trump wouldn't do if you paid him enough money.

They cloned bubba

its the worst version of Weekend and Bernies ever.

Yeah you can do a weekend at Bernie's for a long time with enough money to hire full time health care.

I mean the guy beat covid. When it killed so many others in better health than he was in. That's money there.

Seeing people in the clinic with Alzheimer's, I always thought "I wouldn't wish this on anyone".

But that was before I knew much about Trump .

Considering that micro brain bleeds are a common side effect. I don't see how it wouldn't ultimately do more harm than good.

I read all the documentation on that als drug. The people who wrote it said something like the micro brain bleeds were found with mri scans but cognitive testing didn't reveal that they caused any impairment.

I was like. Wtf.
Do these people not know how the brain works?

Damage is damage. Something has been lost. Regardless if a test found whatever that loss was or not.

Only broad extensive testing of multiple cognitive and motor functions could determine if the micro bleeds were or weren't doing harm. And there are complications with doing that much testing. Plus why would they want to uncover support for increased loss. ?

That was my first experience working in pharmaceutical research and it honestly has made me certain I never will work in pharm research again.

I wonder how many desperate people are paying for drugs with minimum therapeutic value and much higher risks than they think.

I feel like Alzheimer's drugs are predatory in nature because we KNOW that you can't reverse the damage. And there is ample evidence that the processes of dementia likely start in the 30s.

If there is any chance of treating/curing it, it's going to be identifying it early and treating it then. Like in the 30s. And there already is research on going in that area.

But greedy companies want to drain gramp's savings before he dies.

And also. The plaque and tau proteins are likely not the cause but a symptom. So drugs that target them are also probably worthless.

There is just so much research on this. It's unbelievable that they are pushing drugs to target the tau and plaque when we know that's not the cause.

It's just severe in Trump. Its progressive. It will continue to get more and more incoherent.

This is why it's obvious that he's far more impaired than what most people are guessing.

When he started confabulating , that was another big red flag. Confabulations are something that only starts at severe damage levels.

Any drug that targets the plaque and tau proteins has that risk because the drug action is to break up stuff in the brain. Which can damage small blood vessels.

Didn't he accuse the left of taking injections of young people's blood?

They wouldn't use the elbow or forearm for specific drugs which may cause pain to prevent vascular bruising and extensive pain reducing range of motion, or if it is something that requires a slow enough drip that you wouldn't want it introduced close to arteries.

Or you know...somebody who might have a less than lucid moment and rip it out.

There's a reason why nurses use that location extensively for infusions.