It's something I struggle with. Some bad news comes out about some public persona doing something shitty and they get cancelled. But sometimes I really struggle with giving up the things they've made because I like them. There are also occasions where the person has been accused of something and it doesn't seem true to me, or I think they're genuinely sorry and have been punished enough, and the context isn't being considered.

What do you think? Who do you feel conflicted about enjoying?

top 91 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

I like the world building in Fifth Element and Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. But Luc Besson is probably a rapist and certainly a sexual assaulter. I'll watch his old stuff I already own but won't put any more money towards it nor support any new projects.

Edit: oh, also he's not "cancelled". He came out with another movie this year or last, if I recall. 9 times our of 10, celebrities that say they were "cancelled" just had their feefees hurt by people on social media.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Also a pedo. From his wiki page:

    Besson's second wife was actress and director Maïwenn Le Besco, whom he started dating when he was 32 and she was 15 after having met three years earlier.[46] They married in late 1992 when Le Besco, 16, was pregnant with their daughter Shanna, who was born on 3 January 1993.[47][deprecated source] Le Besco later claimed that their relationship inspired Besson's film Léon (1994), where the plot involved the emotional relationship between an adult man and a 12-year-old girl (played by then 12-year-old Natalie Portman).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

    Neil Gaiman. I'm extremely depressed that he's actually a POS, and because I loved his work so much, I'm conflicted. His work itself seemed to have well interrogated values woven into it's fiber, but I guess you never can tell.

    Edit: really fucking bummed about Red Hot Chili Peppers too

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    man, this was the worst. but he's not getting another dollar from me, the bastard. at least he's not fighting Terry Pratchett's estate over Good Omens.

    https://bleedingcool.com/comics/terry-pratchett-estate-removes-neil-gaiman-from-good-omens-kickstarter/

    speaking of which, Terry seems to have been just a great guy and was better than Neil anyway. It's really helped me to let Neil go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    This broke my damn heart. His work seemed to have the values I hold dear and be so insightful and then… he’s getting in the bath with girls who depend on him for housing.

    I am thinking that power corrupts. I came up with that but you can use that phrase if you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Pretty sure the Anthony Keides stuff was well known for decades. It's in his autobiography that was published like 20 years ago or something.

    He's always been the worst part of that band

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I have a theory that all writers are somewhat hypocritical. As an amateur writer myself (I write fan fiction and am also working on original work I hope to get published eventually), I find sometimes the moral messages I try to weave into my work are sometimes messages that I myself am struggling to live up to and writing is a way of trying to work through that

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert. I have several of his print books and still enjoy reading them; ditto his old cartoons. They really spoke to me years ago, as a cubicle-coder.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago

    hey, read the books you already own all you want. that doesn't put anymore money in his pocket.

    being "cancelled" doesn't mean we stick our fingers in our ears and act like it didn't happen. it just means being conscientious about funding the lives of people who are actively making the world a worse place.

    this is a critical detail that I think people often miss

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago*

    I kind of think that Lovecraft was doing about the least-worst thing he could with his absolutely massive trove of neuroses and phobias, which definitely included racism and xenophobia.

    He was convinced that the universe was chaotic and horrifying and that the only thing we could hold on to for stability was racial purity, and that's pretty fucked up, but he turned those feelings into spooky stories about interdimensional space monsters, which is certainly a lot better than writing political tracts or trying to convince everyone that the Armenians are actually to blame for all of our problems.

    Therapy would have been even better, but writing spooky stories was better than some of the very real alternatives that other people were exploring in the 19-teens and twenties.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Lawrence Krauss did this awesome video about global warming for "skeptics" and deniers and it is so good

    Only problem I can't really share it because anyone who googles the name learns he's all over the damn Epstein files

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=lApLD5g1Nrs

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I wouldn't feel too bad about this. He's going where he needs to for funding/support. The War on Science is his latest book, and it's like a who's who of shitty people complaining about how their academic efforts are being attacked for whatever reason and the real answer is generally assault, harassment, or embarrassing their employers (universities). One great example was a professor being outraged on the infringement of their free speech when the university asked people to not use blackface as part of their Halloween costumes. Note what I said there. They didn't say they couldn't wear blackface, just that they should reconsider doing so. That is the exact opposite of censorship. I went into that 4-hour (!) video thinking I'd watch an example or two and couldn't stop.

    If anything, the people you want to reach might find Krauss approachable. Use him as a tool for good. And if you find someone more palatable, use them for the climate deniers who aren't on the anti-woke train.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 71 points 10 months ago* (12 children)

    Both of the Linuses

    Sebastian and Torvalds

    Sebastian because most of the shit he's been accused of has either been fixed openly, or was proven mostly false.

    Torvalds because while he can be extremely rude, he generally only does it when the person deserves to be called out. It's not like he's going off at random people. Society says he should use more tact, but the dude is literally responsible for creating and now maintaining arguably the most important piece of the server software stack globally. There's also a very high chance he's on the spectrum.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Yeah people can complain Torvalds was rude all day, but fuck me if the people he yelled at couldn't be aggressively disrespectful in bringing half-assed work to the table and doing damage or at best wasting other's people time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    He's the literal "You're not wrong, you're just an asshole". But if he wasn't that way, I wonder if we'd have what we have. A nicer developer wouldn't get the same attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You probably needed someone like him in a technical leadership role somewhere, the problem was that he became the face as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago*

    And when he acts shitty towards somebody, he does it publicly, where he himself can also receive the backlash from what he is doing.

    He's not attempting to build a reputation as being a nice guy or a thought leader or anything. He is getting shit done, and anyone that's got a problem with it or him can either go do it better than him or stfu

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    I argue about this all the time, especially if you have to work with non-coders. People who don't code do not understand the big picture.

    Steve Wozniak is brilliant, and had Steve Jobs explain the vision and sell it to non coders.

    For Microsoft. That was Ballmer.

    If youre a tech lead who lets a group of marketing folks try to define the course of any application, you need someone really strong at communication to fight for you. Unfortunately, Linus didnt have one and ripping people a new asshole was the next best thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    i've heard Torvalds be called rude but never "cancelled".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I think there have been attempts to cancel Torvalds after he's slapped down some idiot in a particularly harsh manner, but I don't think they ever stick because he doesn't go off on people unless they really try to do shit that would compromise the integrity of the kernel and didn't take the message to fix/bail on something when it was previously provided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    Sebastian because most of the shit he's been accused of has either been fixed openly, or was proven mostly false.

    From what I understand, nothing was proven false, but there were things that were not proven true, as in "we couldn't find documented evidence that this employee was sexually harassed", which obviously doesn't necessarily mean that it did not happen. They just couldn't find a paper trail of it happening, which is understandable.

    On the other hand, things like all the factual inaccuracies and whatnot were absolutely undeniable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    How do you define “cancelled”?

    As far as I can tell both Sebastian and Torvalds are just as successful (if not more) in their respective roles today as they were before any “controversies” surrounding them were made public.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 19 points 10 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    Kevin Spacey is a fantastic actor.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    His video about what happened is very surreal. It’s on YouTube. I think it’s tied to his House of Cards character but has dual meaning?

    Indeed a great actor, but as a Trekker human being, fuck him for how he treated Anthony Rapp (the engineer from Star Trek Discovery).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Totally. 

    …and if you’re going to take down Kevin Spacey, he should be the 1000th male actor or rock star you go after.

    Like…yeah…people should decide if all the accusations (and no convictions) are worth anything…I think they are. But…why are people like Johnny Depp, Mel Gibson, Alex Baldwin, Sean Penn, etc still working…maybe even working more after crazy shit they did?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Did Depp get accused of more than the Heard thing? He went through a trial and was cleared, I personally don't think he deserves to be dragged, but that's just me I know others disagree

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    He was cleared of wrongdoing in a particular court (not others), not of being a terrible person. Many of the things he admits to exceed anything Spacey was accused of.

    …but I’m not even talking about that. I’m talking about Depps Robert Downey Jr. years (I forgot to mention Robert…one of the biggest sleazebag “comeback” stories): the years when he was a womanizing rock star junkie banging teenagers, hanging out with the Butthole Surfers, and was generally unemployable. We just pretend all that didn’t happen and treat him like he’s a victim of Amber Heard (who was like 25 v 48 when they got together…he practically raised her).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    If you enter that time period, I think it includes Whalbergs beating the Vietnamese man until he went blind. Some things the court of public opinion seems to ignore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    depp got way screwed over by HEARD, to the point of being blacklisted by hollywood, him suing heard was justified.

    Kevin spacey had legitimate SA/SH accusations against him, most of it dint stick because at least 1 accuser died before he could do it.

    mel gibson got cancelled by his antisemitic thing, but he mostly in christian films anyways. I think alec baldwins problem was him being careless with firearms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    but hes been doubling down every since to deflect attention away, which pretty yucky. RAPP said hes over it? is he really, or he doesnt want to ruffle feathers in hollywood, which has more executives that are perverts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    michael jackson made incredible music. i don't even know how much of the stuff about him is true but it does feel weird listening to his stuff now, even though it's extremely well made.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    He was an incredibly talented artist. I think his father deserves most of the blame for Michael's bizarre behavior. Most adults would struggle with the pressures of fame and performing that he spent his whole life under from the time he was like 10 years old. Joe recognized that his kids were talented and then proceeded to squeeze every last red cent he could out of them. No wonder Michael snapped.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 43 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    I don't think we'll ever know. I have a feeling he actually wasn't a pedophile at all, but just felt close to children because he had Peter Pan syndrome or something. He seemed very infantile to me is the only real sense I got of him. Strange person. But without question he did make some r really iconic music.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Ehhhh, I've seen some pics of him being happily surrounded with people known for being sex pests/pedos so idk. Two things can be true, you know, he might have been mentally and developmentally different but he might have also touched some kids, sadly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    I've heard rumors that he was either physically or chemically castrated to keep his beautiful, pure singing voice.

    If that is the case, then it would kind of explain how fucked up he is, or how fucked up he was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Oof. Didn't he have kids though? Or is there a form of castration that doesn't affect one's ability to reproduce? Regardless, yeah, it doesn't absolve him of his sins but let's just say they're attenuating factors for his judgement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    yeah that's my impression as well. being a child star really fucks you up mentally.

    then again i haven't seen the documentaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago*

    I agree, and the thing is we can never really know what someone is like all the time even if we get to know some aspects of them well.

    I've been shocked by things that some people I knew did, that I would never have thought they were capable of.

    I hope that is not the case for MJ, but it might be. And we'll likely never know.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    If you're a slightly creepy odd duck with large amounts of money, it'd make sense to pay a settlement rather than letting a case go to trial even if you're innocent, because juries can be wayward, especially in civil cases, and the reputational damage can easily cost you more than the settlement. So I don't buy the no smoke without fire theory, especially with the proven cases of shakedown artists abetted by contingency-fee slimebag lawyers.

    I lean towards the view that MJ was a wrong 'un, but also wouldn't be surprised if it came out that he was just a twisted, damaged, traumatized, socially isolated guy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    I don't enjoy or like public figures. Having never met them, I cannot like them. I do enjoy the works or products of some people, and knowing the person(s) who created something can influence my chances of consuming it.

    There are some people who have done, or accused of doing bad things, but they have created works that I enjoyed.

    AKA, I never "liked" Neil Gaiman. But I do like American Gods.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 10 months ago

    Fair. I wish the art people made wasn't tainted by their behaviour.

    Like I have a soft spot for Vince Neil even though he killed people drunk driving, because of how his poor little daughter died and how badly it's affected him. I can't help it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I can get onboard with separate the art from the artist, mostly. Especially if you're not paying for the content, arrgh.

    I find it hard to look at them without thinking of what they did, though. It's hard for me to see past the artist to the art, when the artist is so shitty. I mean, he's right there in my face, and I know what he did, so that's all I'm thinking about when they're acting.

    Public people should do everything they can to keep their private lives private. Some of them are very good at it, so it is possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›