archive article: https://archive.ph/3nlOJ

all 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 176 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Another thing I'll host on a torrent forever. Wanna see another (more important, in my opinion)?

Patriot Front had a huge leak of data in 2022 (400GB).

Patriot Front Fascist Leak Exposes Nationwide Racist Campaigns

You can download it at the following torrent address:

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:2c87816e4c81990fb25bbca43dd8d578eaa55886&dn=patriotfront&tr=udp%3A%2F%2F9.rarbg.to%3A2920&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969

I'm seeding this on a permanent basis. I have a gigabit uplink. Please leach and share. Expose these nazi fucks.

It's nice to have super fast internet and no bandwidth caps.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    LOL! The Internet has already had so many people archiving to their personal devices. It will get posted ad infinitum. That's how the Internet works you idiot conservatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    They're issuing C&Ds to all the legit platforms, but the platforms I use don't give a flying fuck about C&Ds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    From other posts, comments:

    https://www.muellershewrote.com/p/watch-the-60-minutes-cecot-segment

    https://archive.org/download/insidececot/60minutesCECOTsegment.mp4

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:r26oym3csssgcjov7tfnlxls6m6c6ckn&dn=60minutes-cecotsegment&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt1.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Item cannot be found.

    Seems like it got nicked

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Can't stop the signal!

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:734abc77f48d11c78543c52004b6f57db71d6d92&dn=60minutes-cecotsegment&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt1.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt2.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&ws=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdownload%2F&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fia601703.us.archive.org%2F32%2Fitems%2F&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fia801703.us.archive.org%2F32%2Fitems%2F

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 10 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I feel like I'm missing context here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    That's Barbra Streisand, of "the Streisand Effect."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I didn't know we had cameras when she was young, I don't recognize her. I thought this was ai Paris Hilton or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Not sure if serious or joking...

    If serious: The photo-capturing camera as we know it has existed in one form or another since the early 1800s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I didn’t know we had cameras when she was young

    In case you aren't joking, all of Napoleon Bonaparte's 4 brothers lived into the age of photography (1826) and had their photo taken with a camera. His youngest brother Jérôme sat for many photo sessions. Only one of his 3 sisters, Caroline, lived into the era but never had a photo taken. Napoleon Bonaparte (08/15/1769 - 05/05/1821), didn't live into the age of photography. US President Abraham Lincoln also has several photos taken of him during the Civil War.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Makes me sad when shitbag nazis fail at being authoritarian fucks. No, not really. Eat shit, Bari Asshole.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    I mean, they succeeded in so far as it wasn't included in the US National broadcast. The overwhelming majority of CBS viewers will not see this. YouTube won't host it. You won't see it on TikTok. You won't see it trending on Twitter. Anyone with the genuine impulse to search out the video doesn't need convincing that CECOT is operating as a horrifying torture and death camp for victims of an American pogrom.

    That Weiss was sloppy in her management of CBS won't matter in the long run, because stories like this won't be funded for research and broadcast in the future, either. The network is being strangled to death and replaced with a full lineup of segments starring Steven Crowder screaming "What is a woman!?!" at college freshmen in between ads for PragerU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I'm the only person in my family who watches 60 Minutes, but tonight, the whole family is watching this video.

    Edit: We watched it. I thought I was going to have to pirate it, but it showed up on my YouTube feed, so it was still up at about 11 PM EST.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Considering some contents in the Epstein files, I'm starting to wonder if the 60 Minutes thing is a desperate distraction

    https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020517.pdf

    [Redacted 1] stated "he raped me." [Redacted 2] said "what" as [Redacted 1] replied "Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago*

    Well, yeah. We already know that Donald Trunp raped E. Jean Carroll, it only makes sense that he also raped Jeffrey Epstein.

    [edit] sorry, bad joke but unfortunately we already know DJT is the worst type of sex offender

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 86 points 10 months ago (25 children)

    So has anyone here watched it? Other than Streisand effect, is there any reason for the fuss?

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 234 points 10 months ago* (14 children)

    I have. It merely presents evidence for what we already knew: CECOT tortures inmates and sending non criminal Venezuelans there with no due process is morally wrong, inhumane, and maybe illegal.

    Censoring it is merely pro regime propaganda. 60 minutes asked for a DHS response and they refused. There’s nothing wrong with the reporting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    and maybe illegal.

    it's definitely illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    For now anyway.

    If I recall the only reason US rights apply to non-us citizens is a supreme court ruling. Scary to think about those implications

    Probably breaks some international law too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    Fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause says “no person shall be denied equal protection”, not “no citizen”

    the same distinction is made in the fifth, “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without the due process of law”

    The constitution is actually quite clear.

    Edit to clarify: the SCROTUS is definitely going to come up with some reason to explain why words do not mean what they mean, but both trump’s actions and siding with him like that are in fact impeachable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Saying “it doesn’t push the ball forward” is such incredible bullshit too. Even if there’s nothing new, giving it awareness is still pushing the ball forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    ...giving it awareness is still pushing the ball forward.

    100%.

    I felt physically sick the last (very rare) time I checked my Nextdoor, and a person reporting ICE activity was getting brigaded with "BuT tHeY'rE ArReStiNg CriMiNaLs AnD pRoTeCtiNg Us" type comments. Like I was seriously HOPING this was bot farm activity. Like it's heartbreakingly painful to see people that are sincerely that stupid.

    The more irrefutable proof of these crimes, the more the "I'll believe anything I hear" normies will accept the truth as "common knowledge", and the hardline fascists get further discredited and ridiculed in public discourse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -21 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I haven't heard about Bari Weiss untill this 60 mins thing. I went and took a look at The Free Press site she is in charge of and I'm seeing lots of articles that are critical of the current administration.

    Where is does this angle that's she is super pro-trump come from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 10 months ago

    You mean like how JD Vance was critical of Trump, to the point of calling him an idiot, unfit for office, reprehensible, and like Hitler?

    Turns out, people just say things and then perform actions that say otherwise.

    Judge people on their actions, not their words.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago*

    I'm not so nuanced about traitors. If she's not actively opposing this government, then she's MAGA trash. She doesn't get to escape blame through careful parsing of her positions.

    The very fact that Larry Ellison put her in charge of converting CBS News to an outlet of the Conservative Propaganda Machine convicts her as a MAGA.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    She built her career on being a "free speech person" opposed to callout culture etc but recent remarks show a more political bent where she wants to "redefine what is acceptable main stream speech".

    She's not pro trump as much as she's anti left so in many ways she's just aligned ideologically with the fascist right and thinks they've been restricting the correct speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Besides the blatant censorship by a Trump sycophant?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, that's the, question. Is there anything interesting in the videos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Someone else linked it below (https://ia802801.us.archive.org/15/items/insidececot/60minutesCECOTsegment.mp4).

    It's only a 15 minute watch, so worth checking out. The TLDW is that the US government is sending non-criminals seeking asylum to be tortured in El Salvador. 97% of people sent there have no criminal record. The people there were beaten, sexually assaulted, starved, denied access to medical care and clean water, forced to remain in stress positions, subject to bright light 24 hours a day, and/or thrown in pitch black isolation cells with no light.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    There is nothing surprising about the video if you’ve been keeping up with the news and not making excuses. It’s just confirmation of what I’ve known.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    It's not a surprise to those of us, still scrolling through this thread of interest. And yet, there's still more people who weren't sure if the prior claims were true and yet more that still don't give a fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Lol. So much of our media has been exposed as entirely useless and/or accomplices to a fascist regime.

    I mean, I guess it's good to have the band-aid ripped off so we don't keep paying attention to them. It's just sad how pathetic it all is.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago

    Anyone helping this be seen by the people, by linking, hosting, mirroring it, is a god damn hero in my book

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago

    Okay it's not a censored/redacted version of an episode but an episode that is (fully) censored, if anyone else was as confused as me.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Why do they even bother censoring it at this point? Like this is something MAGA isn't drooling over and have no issues with whatsoever.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    They'd probably take issue with the man speaking on behalf of the Venezuelans. And that he pointed out only 3% were the violent criminals the Trump administration claims all to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago

    Too late Barbara Streisand.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago

    "There's no business like show business" and other Barbra Streisand great effects, I mean hits.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah. so like

    It's on the internet, and unlike a diamond ring, the internet is truly forever.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    Here's one link and another if that gets taken down.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    I wonder if it really was a mistake at global, or someone was like fuck it, this should be released, and didn't take action to stop it.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Part 1 of the CBS CECOT report was on YouTube yesterday. I already snagged a 720p copy. It doesn't seem censored or edited.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    Censored? What is this North Korea? I thought we had the most transparent administration ever??

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • 17 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post