top 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 162 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And every single one of those companies has gone through rounds of layoffs in 2025. Not only that, but each one of them had released statements saying that their layoffs were (paraphrasing) "strategic reductions in force" unrelated to economic factors.

Which is a long way of stating the obvious: corporate tax cuts don't encourage job growth. Even if that stupid theory were true, companies would have eliminated chunks of their workforce with or without the tax breaks because AI investments (/gambles) are majorly driving this iteration.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago*

    they have even less reason to hire people for thier companies, if they can save money they will just squeeze out the current employees or outsource them. prior to takeover r/conservative by russian bakced mods, early on in trumps term, they actually believe no corporate taxes equal=more jobs.

    the layoffs have been happening since musk started in early 2023, than followed by every company in tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Well my ISP dillegently itemizes every single state local and federal tax they pay as an additional "fee" on my monthly bill. Therefore, I should see that the federal item drop off my bill, right? Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    But MY bills are cheaper!

    Except they're not? This is a perfect snapshot of "trickle down" economics failing. Well, failing for the electorate, huge win for the rich.

    All economic systems funnel money to the top without an educated, democratic electorate.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Trickle down economics only work for the non-wealthy. If you give a 1000$ to a poor person, they would ideally buy locally making the money go around the community.

    However, we are so deep in late stage capitalism that mega corpos have their claws in everything that every dollar given to them is a dollar that doesn't go back into the economy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Your example of giving a poor person money which they spend and circulate into their local economy is literally the opposite of "trickle down".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    I think they are trying to say trickle down can work at lower levels of class, i.e. giving money to the middle class will filter a little bit down to the lower classes. But I still doubt that in our current world, like maybe IF there were more small business and IF those businesses would pay their employees more given more profit coming then maybe but one there is a lack of small businesses for common commodities in a lot of regions, and two those small business owners tend to act like corpos now and my assumption is they would hoard that increased profit especially with how shit the economy has gotten. With a lack of stability in todays economy even the most well intentioned small business owners operating costs could swing way too high at a whim. So even for them saving extra profit as a rainy day fund to keep their business alive in those economic down swings would be crucial to staying afloat. Which again just kinda negates the premise of trickle down working at any level even more.

    All of this just further points out the only solution is trickle up as giving a poor person money will always circulate upwards. With that, now they can afford more of life's necessities and even some luxuries once they can become comfortable. All of which will filter into profits for businesses and spur the economy, create more jobs, etc. Its ridiculous that such common sense seems devoid from policy, like all these companies could do so much better without all this greed. I bet in the long run the savings from not needing to fund bunkers, private protection, bullet proof vehicles, enhanced security, etc. in addition to the economic boom of people being able to actually afford to buy things if the uber wealthy just didnt try to act like parasites would pale in comparison to what they get by from a 8-10% break on these taxes in the short term before the economy slowly grinds to a halt and any profit they got starts slowly dissipating more and more as no one can afford to buy anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Give poor person money: they spend the money.

    Give rich person money: they use it to leverage more money out of the economy of working people.

    Wow so good at business look at all the money they're stealing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Anyone got a link to the inevitable fact checking post? I trust Mr Reich, but it's always nice to follow up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    It's a great question in these times of misinformation.

    It appears to have come from this policy organisation. Naturally they may have an agenda but at least have more credibility than an X tweet:

    https://itep.org/corporate-taxes-before-and-after-the-trump-tax-law/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    I wonder where that guy’s son is from.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Robert Reich is the former Secretary of Labor (Clinton admin).

    His son, Sam Reich, is CEO of Dropout. This is a streaming service that hosts a variety of shows. Cooking shows, improv, D&D games, etc.

    A recurring joke on one of shows Sam hosts is that everyone talks about how he is from Cambridge, Massachusetts for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    BabyTron meme unless my Internet sense is failing me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    So their taxes drop, the cost of goods and services go up because…..why?

    Why is it considered so damn important to keep rich people happy? Just fucking eat them. Or put them in a zoo isolated from the rest of us and tended to by the shitty AI they are so crazy about. Make the entire thing pay per view so I can watch them turn their environments into hellscapes while we live perfectly fine without them.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Human meat isn't going to be very palatable to other humans. Better to compost them and grow something with their remains.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Welp, there's 5 businesses right there that I will not ever buy anything from again.

    They can't pay their fair share of taxes, I guess I can't be a customer.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Ahh the tariffs make so much sense now, moving corporate taxes to the plebs.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago*

    Well, kinda. But also a ton of business to business trade is fucked right now. Automotive manufacturing can shift back and forth across the US/Canada border half a dozen times as pieces are machined and fitted and assembled.

    There's a reason we ditched tariffs for taxes in the 1940s. Tariffs create economic friction at every border crossing. Income/business taxes only capture profits at the end of the accounting period.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Oh cool so Walmart can afford ppl walking out with full shopping carts now

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    During the Recession, in Chicago , a thing called flash mobs started happening. A bunch of people would storm into high end stores, grab whatever they could get their hands on, and run away. I would love to see it happen to big grocery store monopolies, Walmarts, and the like.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    Best part is if and when they try to restore them or raise them they will bitch about the rates being impossible snd 'they will just leave'.

    Fucking shitfuckers...

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago*

    Regardless of how taxed these corporations are, they all steal surplus labor value from the working class. Democrats only want to prevent the parasite class from killing the host, not to remove it.

    I guess this is where im supposed to say thank you and kiss chuck Schumer's feet? standards are loooooow. Let's introduce competition into the electoral process and raise them.

    Electoral Reform Videos

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    If you ever need to remind yourself if Americans are stupid, remember that they elected a born rich criminal with one failed presidency already under his belt who made it very clear he would work to benefit corporations and that he was not a fan of unions or worker rights.

    I mean....that is Grade A stupid right there.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    America was always stupid.

    They just had the advantage that they didn't get flattened by most of WW2.

    The rest of the world is starting to catch up as the US returns to its mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Robert Reich has both a bluesky account and a mastodon account. There's no reason to use a xitter screenshot.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's a lot of money to trickle down, can't wait!!!! /s

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    Corporate giveaway? Call it what it is: corporate socialism. Using the people’s money to line the pockets of oligarchs

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    thank god i don't live in the US.

    EU citizens, never stop fighting.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Well... Damn

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (18 children)

    This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 11 months ago (17 children)

    I like how liberals are always like "Leftists are so powerful that without them the dems lose but so unimportant that we don't need them".

    Almost like it's one of the core tenants of fascism...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (15 children)

    You're twisting yourself into knots. I'm just informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -25 points 11 months ago (14 children)

    "You should've just voted for genocide!!" is what you're saying here. Also, there's more than enough evidence to say the muskrat rigged the election, so even without the protest votes you'd still have won.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Who is "you" in the phrase "you'd still have one". Pretty obvious the person you're arguing with isn't a trump voter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Pretty obvious the person you’re arguing with isn’t a trump voter

    Is that really obvious though? It reads like a troll trying to create pointless division among progressives.

    I always read these people as either political bots or children (or adults, similarly intelligent) spreading a meme created by a political bot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Me: Vote.

    You: Stop creating division!

    Unreal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Textbook DARVO sequencing.

    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARVO)

    On top of that, hypersensitivity, projection, victim-role adoption, blame pre-loading.

    While these are effective rhetorical tools for manipulating people, this isn't how reasonable people engage in conversation.

    If you're not a bot then you're a narcissist or have picked up narcissistic behaviors from reading social media arguments and should, as the kids say, touch grass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    In fairness I can't tell now. Good point. I would also dig at people not voting in protest and then complaining about trump being in power, but that is a straw man in isolation and I've not specifically come across someone with that opinion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago

    Yes, exactly. They use a lot of bad faith arguments, logical fallacies, etc. They're all just literary devices to amp up the messaging and they all follow roughly the same kind of bad faith argument templates.

    Of course, these could be people. The problem is that they seem to simultaneously be completely ignorant of how reality works while also being an encyclopedia of pop culture political references and grievances. If it's a person then it fits the 'chronically online, touch grass please' stereotype, but there are so many others that argue exactly how it does on the exact same topics across all of social media so I just assume it is a bot or a bot-affected person.

    We know there are information operations that exist to shape public perception that are happening on all social media. This is what it looks like, very hard to tell apart from real people (made even harder by real people mimicking them).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    "You should've just voted for genocide!!" is what you're saying here.

    And by refusing to participate they allowed an even worse person to take the helm, and buddy up to Bibi (further than he already was) so he can build another tacky "luxury" resort on the rubble of those genocide victims homes.

    Bravo... 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Or maybe the Dems should've actually done something to prevent it from continuing. So yeah, which is it? Are leftist non-votes important enough that those people should've voted, or are we so unimportant that appealing to the non-existant "moderate republican" and campaigning with literal war criminals was the actual good choice to win?

    I DID tell people to vote for Kamala, btw. That doesn't mean I didn't make fun of her for abandoning us for the favor of Dick Cheney and nevertrumpers. Who still voted for Trump, btw. And that's not even taking into account the fact the election might have been actually rigged.

  • source
  • parent