cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/49618224

"The design drew inspiration from the concept of "a piece of cloth"

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 year ago

Something about a fool and his money....

This looks like an accessory from one of those wild fashion shows.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Oh, from the name and price tag I thought it was a smaller cheaper iPhone. I should have known better.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Silly? Stupid? Sure, but also not at all compulsory and it seems to address a need in the market versus Apple's usual "inventing problems" approach

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    not at all compulsory

    You don't get how consumer cults and peer pressure work, do you?

    it seems to address a need in the market

    A need for what? Fucking pockets? That's been well and truly addressed for hundreds if not thousands of years already.

    Apple's usual "inventing problems" approach

    This is 200% that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Eh.

    It's a limited-release phone case, essentially. This is a marketing campaign meant to go viral to reaffirm brand identity with customers, not a new product they're putting into production. Think: "Oh Apple makes those fun pleated phone holders, they're the fun brand, I'll get my son's next phone form there!" "Oh Dodge makes those super powerful muscle cars, they're the 'real man's' car brand, I'll get my family's next grocery-getter from there!" etc., etc.

    A need for what? Fucking pockets? That’s been well and truly addressed for hundreds if not thousands of years already.

    Can never have enough pockets. I don't know about you, but I also hate putting my phone in my pants pocket. Kind of like how modern cars still don't have a real solution to phone storage, most modern clothes still don't have a good way to store $1,000 electronic devices that for most people carry their whole identity. It's neat, it's novel. Anyone who follows any kind of fashion should recognize Issey Miyake and understand that Apple at least did things right and hired a real celebrated human designer for this.

    This is 200% that.

    Maybe in a long way if you consider that Apple invented the first smartphone fifteen years ago (which they didn't), but like I said, this actually tries to solve the problem of carrying an expensive smart device that I personally have experienced for years.

    tl;dr: if this was just called the ISSEY MIYAKE Phone Carrier, 99% of ya'll would look at it for ten seconds, call it a silly, overpriced novel designer accessory that's been around forever and go about your day without getting all eschatological about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    but like I said, this actually tries to solve the problem of carrying an expensive smart devic

    Cross body bags, purses, fanny packs etc etc etc have all existed for hundreds of years. It doesn't solve a problem because the problem had already been solved. When Apple sells T shirts, no one claims, "Apple solved a problem."

    Imo the disdain is completely about the exhorbant price for a simple purse that lacks any of the craftsmanship of expensive hand bags.

  • source
  • parent
  • 36 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 44 points 1 year ago

    $80 more for a longer strap is pretty funny.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Also that photography direction, "Like what if you made it look as poorly lit as possible by shining a flashlight on the product?"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    They made a sock.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Apple fanboy here and what the actual fuck is this? This would have been funny on April Fool’s Day. It’s now the dumbest thing I’ve seen online all day, and I’ve seen a fair few dumb things. Maybe all week.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    This is just something Apple does once in a while. Remember when the new Mac Pro model came out a few years back and they sold optional wheels for the tower that were just wildly overengineered and cost hundreds of dollars? These "Apple is selling something SO EXPENSIVE" stories just sell the idea of Apple as a lifestyle luxury brand. You'll never see anyone with one of these in real life, but you can bet they're included in swag bags at celeb events.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah, step two is to buy a Pixel with iPhone 11 level performance and just not give a fuck that Google sells my personal information off the back porch.

    Nah, I don't agree with everything Apple does. Like the Vision Pro. I get that it's not a VR headset by Facebook and that it's a "spatial computer." I don't care, it's not what I want and I certainly don't need it. And the iPhone Pro... it meant something before, but this generation? Base 17 is all I need. The optical zoom is a lie (it crops its main camera to get you 2x zoom) but it's good enough for my needs. Never cared about the iPad, but my wife loves hers. HomePod is expensive but good (like Bose, though maybe not as good as Bose, I dunno). I like Macs. I like the idea that you can buy a computer and not necessarily be the product. Like yeah they all have telemetry, but I don't have to have Candy Crush on my Mac because King... well, I guess Microsoft owns King now? Bought them with Activision. Before, it was because King bought the rights to Windows 10 users. Macs aren't perfect, but they don't do shit like that.

    I dunno, I'm not a brand evangelist, I just like what I like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I was an Apple fanboy too, but with all the bootlicking they've been doing, I have a feeling they will create a backdoor for Trump admin to use. I've jumpe to Pixel 9a with Graphene OS. I like it so far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I wouldn't go so far as to say a backdoor, but I do see them removing apps at Trump's behest. In fact they've already done so (and so did Google), the ICE stuff.

    The future isn't apps that are curated by an app store, it's on the web where they can't easily control it. They'll need to block it at the network level, but a VPN could get around it. Then it's 100% on the user.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Ah yes just what everyone needs an isock

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Wtf, I thought this was going to be a new small iPhone to replace the 13 mini which some people miss. But no, lol.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    From the title I was thinking a smaller, cheaper iPhone.

    Nope. It's an overpriced bag for your overpriced phone. 🤦‍♂️

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Do they sell one with "I'm a Fucking Moron" printed on it? Because they should.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Oh neat, a knitted sheep's scrotum in an assortment of colors.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    When stretched, the open textile subtly reveals its contents and allows users to peek at their iPhone display. iPhone Pocket can be worn in a variety of ways — handheld, tied onto bags, or worn directly on the body.

    "Subtly" digging around your shoulder-holstered tube sock.

    They forgot to mention that you can also use it as the world's most expensive roll of quarters.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    WTF am I looking at? Like a money belt (but a sash) for your phone?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I thought this was the onion! But no, it's real!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    This is pretty egregious, but honestly anyone who wants to buy it should. They deserve to be swindled have what they paid for. Anyone who doesn't want to buy it, won't.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    And people complain about the price of hand-crocheted items...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    For people confused about the price, just look up any clothes by Issey Miyake. That’s the costly part, Issey Miyake.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Stop giving this dumpster fire oxygen

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I mean, if this was sold by Issey Miyake themselves, it would probably be pretty well aligned with the rest of their prices. But being sold by Apple as an Apple product, the price feels really out of place.

    I’m not saying $2-300 for this would be reasonable in any case, but it might have been more expected. Also, fun fact: All of Steve Jobs’ black turtlenecks were designed by Issey Miyake!

  • source
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    There is a certain type of person who fanboys out toward Apple, and a certain type of person who buys things to show off as status symbols. I don’t think those types overlap much these days, which is why we’re seeing the iPhone Air fail.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Samsung fanboys will see this and say “fuck apple”

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As will everyone else with an accurate perspective of that walled garden of exploitation and grift 🤷🏻

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Calling a designer pouch “a walled garden of exploitation and grift” from your “accurate perspective“ says more about you than you think

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 7 comments in c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Is this a late/early April fools day joke?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    iPhone Pocket in the short strap design retails at $149.95 (U.S.), and the long strap design at $229.95 (U.S.).

    Wow, what an absolute ripoff for what is essentially a knitted sock with straps.

    They colors may look stylish but it looks like an absolute nightmare to check the screen.

    Even though it is stated that you can stretch the fabric to peek at the screen, not one of the photos illustrates this “feature”. Strange.

    Can’t wait for this to be knocked off and sold on AliExpress for $10 with free shipping.

    I really do like Apple products, but this accessory is a bit too much of a stretch (pun intended) for me.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have 2-4 of these preinstalled on all my pants.

    Also, did this start when someone made an iPurse joke and someone didn’t let it go?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Nearly fainted because I thought this was a new “iphone nano” phone, but alas it’s just an insanely overpriced case strap.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I don’t understand how a Japanese brand thinks that people need this. Based on my typical experience walking around in Tokyo I estimate these would be empty approximately 120% of the time

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I guess apple owners are just a known gullible consumer pool to tap.

  • source