This is what the internet is for.
post
Pointless because she merely says she is what starts a party, not that her presence is required for a party to continue once started.
that's the point. she walks in, the party starts, she walks out, the party continues, she walks in again, the party should start again, creating a paradox as the party was already going
No, no, no. A party doesn't start until she walks in; it doesn't start when she walks in. So a party has no obligation to start again if it's already in progress.
Nah it's like using the ignition on an already running car engine.
It makes the neighing sounds, but the car is already running, so no effect.
Do you ever think that some of us shitposting weirdos will be thought of the same way as Plato in, like, a thousand years if all our internet shitposting was kept around that long?
Diogenes, then?
Behold, the original shitposting weirdo!
What if she changes her mind? She's the law maker, so she can do whatever she wants and math has to adjust.
Ke$ha the goat ngl
till
There was no cash-drawer in there, right? What kind of party was it?!?
all 33 comments