all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Test or One-Day?

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Assuming one spherical cricket in a vacuum

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Wow.

    It's zero degrees here in June.

    Weird.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How did you hear negative chirps?

    Can I learn this power?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Using the metric version you can get zero with no chirps. The method doesn't work at all for the current temperature though, you can't get -1°C any way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How do you count just one cricket's chirps? There are usually tons of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Glad to know it's America and crickets that find fahrenheit more convenient for temperature.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I think that's how we got fahrenheit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Actually it was originally based on the freezing temperature of a brine and human body temperature.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Ah, so 32° is when an unknown concentration of human brine freezes, and 98.6° is the average human temperature

    What am I even reading any more

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think the brine probably froze at 0° F, which ended up correlating to 32° F for regular water. And the body temperature at 100° F ended up correlating to 212° F for water to boil. That's the way I understand it anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Fahrenheit temperature scale, scale based on 32° for the freezing point of water and 212° for the boiling point of water, the interval between the two being divided into 180 equal parts. The 18th-century physicist Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit originally took as the zero of his scale the temperature of an equal ice-salt mixture and selected the values of 30° and 90° for the freezing point of water and normal body temperature, respectively; these later were revised to 32° and 96°, but the final scale required an adjustment to 98.6° for the latter value.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What the hell was the brine that it required it to be 32° below the freezing point of water? Even salt water would have frozen by that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Far fewer people know that 0° and 100° in Fahrenheit also correspond to specific real-world values. 0°F corresponds to a temperature where a brine is made of equal parts ice, water, and ammonium chloride. Such a brine, interestingly, is a frigorific mixture, meaning that it stabilizes to a specific temperature regardless of the temperature that each component started at. Thus, it makes for a really nice laboratory-stable definition of a temperature. Similarly, 100°F was initially set at "blood heat" temperature, or the human body temperature. While not super precise, it was a fairly stable value. As good as anything in the early 1700s.

    Source from a quick Google search: https://gregable.com/2014/06/temperature-scales.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    ...or count the chirps in 8 seconds and add 4.

    Why am I taking 25seconds and dividing by 3? Accuracy?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    I feel like parentheses don't belong in explaining math if they aren't used appropriately.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    But what species is the cricket?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I was expecting some kind of Duckworth-Lewis formula.

  • source