▲ 325 ▼ Ask the crickets (mander.xyz) submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 36 points 1 year ago (2 children) ...or count the chirps in 8 seconds and add 4. Why am I taking 25seconds and dividing by 3? Accuracy? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (1 child) My guess would be better approximation as you avoid a "fluke", as 8 second is a very short time where nothing could easily happen even with crickets being present permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yimby@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago I'm just bothered they chose divide by 3, instead of 16 seconds divide by 2 which is wayyy easier permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (1 child) My guess would be better approximation as you avoid a "fluke", as 8 second is a very short time where nothing could easily happen even with crickets being present permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yimby@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago I'm just bothered they chose divide by 3, instead of 16 seconds divide by 2 which is wayyy easier permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yimby@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago I'm just bothered they chose divide by 3, instead of 16 seconds divide by 2 which is wayyy easier permalink fedilink source parent