top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 181 points 1 year ago (8 children)

There is SNAP funding.

Even the Republicans ensured that there was 5 Billion Dollars prepared to ensure that SNAP funding could not easily run out.

It is being Withheld by Trump

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [+] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    But the two-page document states that “contingency funds are not legally available to cover regular benefits.”

    So what's the point of a "Contingency Fund" if it can't be tapped to cover contingencies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    “The document states that the contingency fund is reserved for such things as helping individuals in disaster areas. It cited Tropical Storm Melissa, which could become a major hurricane in the coming days, as an example of why it’s important to have funds available to mobilize quickly in the event of a disaster. The document was obtained by The Associated Press and was first reported by Axios.”

    Gov shutdown isn’t enough I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It just reads like an excuse.

    Trump isn't supposed to be able to deploy the national guard the way he did, he wasn't allowed to move funds for the wall, he shouldn't be able to decimate the Dept of Education, they shouldn't be able to deport people without a trial.

    The Trump admin can almost do anything it wants, so they could use the funds, they've chosen not to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 116 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No funding, but there's 40 billion to "buy" the election in Argentina...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And $300 million for a new ballroom, $230 million to compensate him for the FBI investigating his extensive criminal activities, etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A plane he's converting into AF1, that he will just keep. I think a couple more planes for ICE Barbie....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    That plane won't even be available until he's out of office, yet we have to pay for renovating it, so he can fly a palace around in his retirement.

    Unless he's not planning on leaving. Suddenly he's acting like he knows he has to leave after this term, but, y'know, he LIES.

    He's not going anywhere, if he has anything to say about it. Out of office means prison, or worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    A literal traitor to our nation. Enabled and protected by a literal traitor party.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Republicans: cutting food assistance

    Also Republicans: "Waaaah! Why aren't people having kids?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Incase anyone wants to help their local community. I talked to my local food pantry today and they said they prefer financial donations vs food drops. They can make a dollar go further than we can at the grocery store

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Work with a food bank and this is spot on, except they do get food donations that make sense from farmers and food service companies. But people buying food at the grocery store will do worse than the food bank can do with their connections, experience, and volume.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Actually starving people out is a great way to get them to revolt.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Literally the actual thing that lit off the French Revolution. It wasn't just the taxes. It wasn't the bad labor practices. It wasn't the decadence of the rich. It was women marching to the palace because so many couldn't afford bread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Times have changed since then though. Modern public infrastructure is a lot better suited for troop movements compared to the 1700s and 1800s when there was plenty of revolutions occurring across Europe. People seem to have this idea that they're going to take out their guns and start guerrilla warfaring massive groups of armed troops.

    I do believe we need to be more aggressive, more proactive, but there is a good chance that it might be expected. It's entirely possible that they're just waiting for an excuse to start gunning people down in the streets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Right now the soldiers and ice feel invulnerable, untouchable. Imagine being a foot soldier in an area where most folks now want you dead. Doesn't matter if its crappy hunting rifles shooting at you, they will kill you, they demoralize you. All of a sudden your brothers and sisters want you dead and you're not quite sure what you're even doing there. Worse, maybe you're not onboard with all of the stupid shit Trump and his ilk are doing, maybe you decide you're actually with the civilians.

    No question though, so much death is on the way, but the fight is worth it for our children and future.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    a qoute from ff13, when lightning was discussing wether to destroy a FAL'CIE that can make food/supplies out of thin air. and "she said hungry people are an angry people." by destroying the very thing that feeds people will cause the people to start persecuting "l'cie people" and demand thier executions.(of course this was all engineered by the fal'cie as a contigency)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    The US government seems to want people to violently revolt.

    I imagine they want to use it as an excuse to take absolute power. But I don't think they thought it thoroughly.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    he would need the miltiary on his side, but it doesnt seem like they are too keen to do this, considered they are also furloughed. that 130mil isnt even going to the troops too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    MAGAts seeth with resentment at being told that they are backwards, ignorant, stupid racists. They want to hurt people because they have been hurt. They never think about improving themselves or not being backwards, ignorant, stupid racists. They love Donald Trump because he hurts people. MAGA had a hardon for cruelty.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    A tyrant exercises power in a manner that is arbitrary, unreasonable, and cruel.

    Trump makes it a point to always do all 3 simultaneously

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Have they tried having their parents put them on the company board?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago

    Interesting history fact of the day: It took about one and a half years from Hitler coming to power to the night of the long knives.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Just watch.

    In 1 year (midterms), and in 3, US voters who starved from this will forget all about it and vote based on whatever outrage pops up on cable news or their social feed. And, more specifically, not vote in primaries where both party's problems can really be addressed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I still wonder if they are banking on making 2025 just such a miserable year that it's comparitively easy to make 2026 feel good.

    Turn SNAP back on, dial back the tariffs. People feel a remarkable improvement in food security and prices. Might still be in worse shape than end of 2024, but people will tend to remember change in experience rather than their experience in absolute terms.

    The narrative will inevitably be that somehow the GOP figured out how to overcome those pesky democrats and restore the things that the democrats broke.

    If things remained persistently broken, then the narrative couldn't really overcome people's actual experience. They strongly branded and made it clear that this was the Trump show, he's got the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. When it comes to 'right now', it's hard to ignore that reality. But once they make it 'last year's problem', then mental gymnastics can resume to blame the democrats.

    Hell they could resolve this crisis by ultimately letting the democrats have what they are asking for and the voters would still credit the GOP with restoring the benefits that the democrats are demanding. They've already set the stage by saying democrats want to give all the money to illegal immigrants (which they explicitly don't) and so there will be some BS to claim they 'compromised' by getting the democrats to give up illegal immigrant eligibility (they aren't eligible and were never asked to be) and then take credit for the 'good' version of the outcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He's also doing it because it's what billionaires want.

    Hmm these people don't want to work a 996 to afford my enshitified garbage, better fund lobbying to starve them to death and if that doesn't work I'll make sure to fund propaganda to stoke racial tensions then just in case they get wise as a last line of defense why not fund the modern day Gestapo

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    A shit stain in history

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    My friend, cruelty is not only the theme of his administration - it's the theme of many of it's backers too.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    I thought it hurt enough in the aughts, and in 2017-2020 that we'd do something about it, but we didn't.

    So it's going to hurt more. Our aristocrats seem determined to let the third estate know its place.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Seems to me that cruelty is the theme of conservative governments worldwide.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Thanksgiving is going to be crazy. People are going to be so mad about so many things not working

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Trump said he is probably not going to heaven. I feel kind of certain of that... I mean, assuming there is a god even.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So, my first question is why hasn't it been an issue before? Was the timing so that they wouldn't miss a payment? Or was there a vote to make an exception for snap? Not in favor of this at all, I just don't understand the mechanisms of a lot of this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So, my first question is why hasn’t it been an issue before?

    The USDA maintains an emergency fund for situations like this. This time they're saying they can't use it, and it's gone to the courts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    are you "there yet" America?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Would be pretty strange if there were go fund mes around the world to feed hungry Americans meanwhile going into trillions of debt whilst holding the positions they do on the market and in WH. I don’t think a country could fail harder at sustaining a society. This is embarrassing. Even compared to Roman times. Like they failed… but not so stupidly. This is the stupidest fail ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wish there was a way to prevent this dickhead from accessing his McDonald’s budget while others are starved. I don’t even need him to go hungry, just no access to his preferred slop.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    On the plus side, y'all have a right to bear arms. So that's nice.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Tbh, if you can't afford food idk how your supposed to afford getting a gun. How does gun taste? Heh heh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I was under the impression the US had the highest gun ownership per capita in the world. I'm sure those patriots are gonna rise against this tyranny. Any time now...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I’m a gun owner, but the US has the “highest rate” of ownership in a way that most Americans don’t understand stats. We have a shitload of guns, enough for like one in every humans arms. However only like 45% of homes have guns. Like me most of us gun owners don’t just own one, we own like… a number that’s greater than 5. So it skews the data.

    Still I thankfully live in Blue AF California. My guns are for when we go to secede. Which I feel is getting sooner. Cascadia and all that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    it make sense, since the gop is concerned, they always threaten to cut MEDICAID/CARE, and snap, or subsidies but they never actually do it, just for sound bites for fox and murdoch. now with TRUMP, they are afraid of not offending him, so they are rubberstamping all his demands.

    plus the "cuts" were always used a distraction from the corporate tax cuts, now they actually have to Cut the very thing they always teased the magats about for decades.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It is almost like Americans are getting what they voted for...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    the election was hacked and stolen, they didn’t vote for this

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Russia/star link yup thats why the heavy push into using the voting machines in red states. oh if you're not aware this is also what happened mitch mcconells last senate election, but no news media called it out over it, they largely buried it. now hes pretending to have these "freezes" to avoid any confrontation of the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is a legislative branch action not executive….

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    ikr? Can we start labeling this as a Republican choice, not just Trump?

    This is a Republican administration operating with support from a Republican-controlled Senate and House and by Republican judges and other appointees.

    Project 2025 isn't Trump's plan, it's a Republican plan. Let's start talking about the party that's doing this to America so they can't just claim it was "all Trump" and be believed when it all comes tumbling down around them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why don't Democrats do the "lesser of two evils" thing and pass the government funding bill? People are suffering because of this!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -28 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    House Republicans offered a bill to keep specifically SNAP funded while everything else is still under negotiation.

    Democrats declined.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Not sure if you're just blatantly ignorant of what's actually happening or if this is just an attempt to smear Democrats, but it'd be nice if a Republican could take the extra 5 minutes to actually read about what's going on. I'll do it for you (you're welcome).

    Sen. Hawley introduced the "Keep SNAP Funded Act of 2025" on Oct. 21st. It's currently with the Senate Appropriations Committee, as of that time. It's not likely to go anywhere though as REPUBLICAN LEADERS, are not prioritizing it. From a Politico article, there were several quotes from Republicans stating that they don't want a stopgap, that it doesn't actually fix the problem.

    But hey, it's so much more convenient to just blame Democrats for every problem, isn't it?

    Sources [Politico], [Congress.gov]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You might be the dumbest person on lemmy I've seen. Conservatives completely control the fed. They could do it if they wanted to.

    They're using Democrats as a scapegoat so morons like you fall for the "but the Democrats won't play ball" hook line and sinker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What do you mean by this? The democrats are literally engaging in a filibuster. Did you not see Katherine Clark say “There will be families that are going to suffer… but it is one of the few leverage times we have.”?

    They literally just have to let the budget go to vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    For one thing the filibuster standing rule can be ditched by simple majority. Neil Gorsuch's nomination is in fact an example of the Senate overcoming the filibuster if they want to. The SC nomination was so important to the GOP they did it.

    However, the consequences of the government shutdown are not as important as having a conservative majority in the supreme court to the GOP. Or the GOP are intentionally delaying as a strategy to try to let the narrative of blaming the democrats sink in before they 'miraculously' overcome it and take credit for fixing it after the democrats 'broke' it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Republicans tried to piecemeal their way to cutting the ACA subsidies. Dems actually resisted that bad deal for a change. If Trump is so damn good at making deals, why are deals not getting made?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Elections have consequences. If Republicans wanted a supermajority they should have worked harder on election day. Now they have to negotiate, they're just choosing not to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Maybe the democrats should have worked hard enough to get a majority. Or chosen to negotiate by allowing the bill for temporary snap funding to pass.

    The democrats blocking the last one is them DIRECTLY withholding snap funding until they get what they want.

    Their strategy, is that people are stupid and will blame the republicans for the actions of the democrats. More likely though, the democrats are going to give the republicans that supermajority in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe the democrats should have worked hard enough to get a majority.

    So the republicans are literally incapable of governing the country without a supermajority, but the democrats are? Who would vote republican then?

    Republicans control the house, senate, and presidency. Where's the leadership?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments