all 54 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Last time a fake id worked, just searched for an id sample online and gimped it to match the name and the date on the google acc.

Didn't even have to change the default photo.

This was some years ago, idk if it still works tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Wasn't there a website where you could get ai photos and videos for this?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Black male people look according to this site all the same no matter the age?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Probably a lack of data in the training set. It reminds me of the early versions of facial recognition software which had trouble telling not just black people apart, but also women of all ages and white men below a certain age. It was because these early versions had only been trained on photos of employees at the company, and they were mostly older white men.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Credit card is the best of the options. There are all sorts of strict rules and restrictions about how companies store and use credit card information. Those rules don't exist for the other options.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I don’t want to give any of my info to Google though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Compromise is always the game.
    You either comprise by not using YouTube anymore, or you compromise by giving them the most tightly restricted information they'll accept.

    You'll never have perfect privacy. I guarentee Google already has a supressing amount of info on you. At least this is officially protected. Once you give the card as proof, you can probably delete it from their saved data. And they have to honor that, both by law and contracts with Visa etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    That's full identity verification giving them a credit card. They may be required to delete the card, but they aren't going to be required to delete a record that says we confirmed the identity of this account with a credit card on this date. If you don't want your name and social security number tied to your google account don't give them your credit card.

    Frankly though, we all know google is the worst of the worst for privacy. Bypassing the age verification will only by OP time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Do not listen to this guy.

    You're literally in Gestapo times and talking about "compromising" sensitive personal information, like they wouldn't be able to track you down in an instant with a few breadcrumbs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Well yah. I mentioned not using YouTube anymore. That's a viable option.
    So is moving to the wilderness somewhere, and living off the grid.
    Or to a poor country where it's isn't financially worthwhile to for companies to track everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, but you were casting compromise as a choice between giving your CC info and your ID, and making it look like these are all inevitable to the end user.

    Let's not forget that Google is the bad guy enacting these rules, and for Pete's sake, stop blaming the user.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Does it seem plausible that someone would forget about the shitty situation, in a discussion about the least bad option in said shitty situation?

    Do we really always need to point out the obvious thing we're already talking about?

    I certainly hope not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm waiting for the change in T&Cs to basically say "If you don't watch enough ads, you will be auto subscribed to YT premium using the ccard on file"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Can't you use a VPN and route your traffic outside of your country?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tampermonkey extension still works for me to unlock age-restricted videos. Is it having issues for you?

    If you don't have it, check out these two links:

    https://greasyfork.org/en/help/installing-user-scripts

    https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/521089-youtube-age-restriction-bypass-stealth-version

    It's got instructions for nearly every browser. Once you have the extension you can install whichever scripts you like. I mostly use it for verification bypass but there's a lot of other cool stuff you can do too.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    For me what worked is restating the router. I read that you use VPN, so I don't know I it will work.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It almost certainly won't work but I'd be curious if any test credit card numbers work for that purpose. They still pass the Luhn algorithm, but I'm guessing Google is still gonna reach out to some service to verify the CC details.

    Test cards: https://docs.stripe.com/testing

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    if all fails i can highly recommend invidious. you can also import your youtube subscriptions

    good luck OP

    EDIT: yea... age restricted videos are off the table though.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Can you try to make a new account? Or use any of the YouTube frontends?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    How did you do it before?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Assume he is an adult. Explain why he should.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Should what? I didn't say he should anything...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The same question could be asked of your original comment. Go ahead and expand on what you meant by "why would he want to?", then I'll explain what I meant by my reply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I don't debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don't care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don't waste more time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after.

    Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant?

    What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong?

    Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?"

    Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on...

    In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future

  • source
  • parent