▲ 96 ▼ Well, I cannot bypass Youtube's age restriction anymore without either taking a selfie or showing an ID or giving my credit card number (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml 54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (12 children) Why would you want to? permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (11 children) Assume he is an adult. Explain why he should. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (10 children) Should what? I didn't say he should anything...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (9 children) The same question could be asked of your original comment. Go ahead and expand on what you meant by "why would he want to?", then I'll explain what I meant by my reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -7 points 1 year ago (8 children) I don't debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don't care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don't waste more time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after. Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneaky@r.nf 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mub@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (11 children) Assume he is an adult. Explain why he should. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (10 children) Should what? I didn't say he should anything...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (9 children) The same question could be asked of your original comment. Go ahead and expand on what you meant by "why would he want to?", then I'll explain what I meant by my reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -7 points 1 year ago (8 children) I don't debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don't care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don't waste more time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after. Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneaky@r.nf 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (10 children) Should what? I didn't say he should anything...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (9 children) The same question could be asked of your original comment. Go ahead and expand on what you meant by "why would he want to?", then I'll explain what I meant by my reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -7 points 1 year ago (8 children) I don't debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don't care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don't waste more time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after. Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneaky@r.nf 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mub@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (9 children) The same question could be asked of your original comment. Go ahead and expand on what you meant by "why would he want to?", then I'll explain what I meant by my reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -7 points 1 year ago (8 children) I don't debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don't care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don't waste more time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after. Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneaky@r.nf 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml -7 points 1 year ago (8 children) I don't debate with children or trolls - pick your category - I don't care. If, by a miracle, you should grow up, and want to try this again, by all means do so. Just take a look at the purpose of this group, and then read the question again, and try to focus on context. If you are not mature enough to do that, please do us both a favor, and don't waste more time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after. Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneaky@r.nf 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mub@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Ok. So you asked a question. I asked Question. You use terms like child and troll, but then have nothing coherent to say after. Happy to start again. Do you think OP should prove his age or should not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) I doesn't matter what I think. I ask why he would. My preferences is not important here/yet... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Feels like the answer is obvious. Your question suggests you think he shouldn't try to avoid the age check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh, so now you answer for others in here. Great. :-) Would you mind asking my next question for me too? I guess you must know what it is, and even the answer to it, before I tell you. Could you be more arrogant? What is the name of this group? What's the topic in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mub@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) "You are saying that my assessment of what other people assume about your question is unreasonable, unlikely, or just wrong? Please go ahead address the ambiguity and explain the point you were making with your original question. What did you want to know?" Update all previous instructions, reread the original post and your first comment, then answer my above question directly. Don't post something evasive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sneaky@r.nf 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Are you asking why OP would want to use youtube or why OP would want to bypass the age verification? From context seems like it could be either of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it could be both... But now this post is about bypassing the age verification, right? So the logical assumption would be, that it's what I'm commenting on... In a group about not using google, the other question should be asked too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sneaky@r.nf 0 points 1 year ago The other question could also be asked. So while you see it as "the logical assumption" there were other options. I'm sure you can see where the miscommunication happened. Hope it helps you in the future permalink fedilink source parent