No.

The correct answer is Gary, Indiana.

Some of them could be deported to Russia. They are doing Putins work, so he should pay their pensions.

Even the system of checks and balances were kind of a fuckup if you think about it - the whole system just presumes that most people are acting in good faith and bad faith actors are limited to a few positions or a single branch.

And for a mandated maximum age for politicians

Yeah, instead of having a lifetime appointment, or having a specific number of justices, they could just make it so that, at the beginning of the 4 year presidential term, the President gets to nominate a fixed number of Supreme Court justices, who serve for a fixed number of years.

I heard somebody propose that system, and I can't help thinking that it would solve a lot of the problems with our Supreme Court.

There are some laws tied to the lifetime of a person, like appointing certain judges, and copyright law, and the more I think about it, the more I realize that there is always a better solution.

Technically, I don't think supreme Court appointments are necessarily lifetime appointments. Appointments to the federal judiciary are lifetime appointments, but the constitution doesn't specify that federal judges can't be rotated in and out of the supreme Court. I could be remembering that wrong though, it's been a while since my last read through.

While you are at it, add term limits to congress and senate seats as well.

Well you also from context seem to be implicitly comparing a presidential system to a parliament system which had different design goals. The presidential system isn't good but the fatal flaw is treating the president like an elected king, not how often you can vote against them. The fatal flaw is not fixing the two party system. The fatal flaw was that it was designed by people doing their best to appease southern shitbags. The fatal flaw was they made the system too hard to change.

Voting for our king every 4 years was the improvement, it was everything else that was regressive.

Id say it's more than a bit different. It would be like if you or I started going into work Monday and Tuesday, and skipping Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Except yeah, they still get paid the same. To bad we couldn't all have jobs like that.

Imagine working 2 days a week instead of 5. That's a pretty big difference.

They spend most of their time fund raising

And news punditry.