top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 237 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know this bed is great and all, but what it's really missing is a mandatory connection to the Internet!

...jfc

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    “Carla! Carla! What the fuck is this? I know you sleep on a 25. A 25 or a 30 if you fuck up swiping. I know for a fucking fact that you would NEVER choose to sleep on a 60, and yet I found a goddamn record of a 60 when I was out last week. Who was it? Who was here?”

    I really can’t see any other reason. A dial isn’t sexy but it’s far easier in every way

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 174 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    People in the 80's: "In the year 2025 we're going to have hoverboards and flying cars!"

    2025: "I can't use my bed because the servers are down"

    Stop making the future stupid. Never buy anything that needs to be connected to a server to work for no good reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Smart products themselves are not the issue. The issue is making everything cloud based. The solution is companies designing their products so they can be controlled over the network.

    It's a fucking bed! It doesn't need a persistent connection to some server. The problem is that they also want to mine and sell your data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Smart products are part of the issue, and smart products that fail in dumb ways are a really big part of the issue.

    Any smart product, pretty much by definition, has to have a computer in it. Anything with a computer in it can be hacked. There's really no good reason that your bed should have an attack surface.

    If you are going to have smarts in something, it really needs to fail well. Like, for a bed, it should have something that bypasses the smarts and lets it go back to "dumb bed" mode no matter what. No matter what position it's in, it should be possible to make it go flat even if you have no Internet connection. In fact, even if the smart parts are not working at all, there should be a way to make it go flat, even if that's a purely mechanical system that allows you to bypass the motors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The easiest way to implement this is to avoid the IoT entirely. I strive to avoid any smart products that cannot be perpetually used offline (a.k.a. most of them).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago

    lol, e-waste beds.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    I’ve heard these beds are actually quite effective at helping you sleep and then wake up more naturally.

    But they have wrapped entirely local events (it’s all just timers, folks) behind a cloud-exclusive subscription and the product is useless on a sunny day like we had yesterday.

    They’re enormously expensive and the subscription serves no useful purpose other than to line the pockets of the investors.

    I have a strict rule of no cloud dependency in my house. Otherwise, I’d be interested - if the price was remotely reasonable.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can get other versions than eight sleep. I had an insert for my pillow. Can't remember the brand though. It ran locally via an app and Bluetooth. I ended up returning within the trial period, due to it forming bubbles in the circulation, which woke me up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    You can flash your own firmware if you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    "sorry honey just a bit longer, I'm in the process of flashing the bed, we can go to bed soon...god damn sig faults!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Huh? It’s the exact same thing as any other electronic in any home assistant smart house. Put firmware on it that you control. Why would you need to do anything about it at night.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Because that’s when you have the time to do the maintenance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why would you need to do maintenance at all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Sometimes you get a new dream machine that has internal ipv6 disabled by default and only your matter over WiFi lights stop working, but you think they're thread, which shouldn't leak ipv6 past the otbr. So you work on getting them reconnected to the Internet by removing your firewall policy that kept them local, but Ubiquity now has Zones as well, and your dumbass did a little of each. Plus, for some reason, they'll negotiate an ipv4 and drop off the network, and there's no easy way to identify a bulb by it's IP or mac address. It's not like the Mac addresss is printed on the bulb, so you try to judge by signal strength. But then your buddy who's been helping you troubleshoot for the past couple hours tells you to link him the lights from your order history, so only then do you realize they're matter over WiFi and not matter over thread, and enabling ipv6 locally does the trick. Now you've just got a set up your automations again, because you had the bright idea to put actual switches in the walls that depend on home assistant, and the automations don't know the new entities so none of your wall switches work until that's fixed. And eventually you'll get around to reinstating that firewall policy to block them from the Internet, but not today because you've spent long enough for one day on fighting with your light bulbs.

    Or so I hear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You don’t fluff your pillows or make your bed or wash the linens? Bed stuff needs daily maintenance; hopefully flashing the firmware on your smart pillow wouldn’t be daily, but you want to keep the bed bugs away, Shirley?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    I don't do the first two, and I wash them weekly. My home assistant stuff never needs maintenance, so no I'd wager that if I set it up locally it would work fine if the software was stable. But you said that's when you'd do maintenance, at bedtime, which is also not when you'd be making the bed or fluffing the pillows or washing the sheets.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I wonder how it compares in functionality - to be clear, there’s no functionality I’m aware of that would require cloud (perhaps historical data).

    Still, they’re wildly expensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I bought a brand new one of these on Marketplace because I really need a cooler bed, but I'll be damned if I get sucked into a subscription for a fucking bed!! The hack i used was a workaround where you setup your own server that will set the bed temperature automatically at bedtime and can update it once again at some point during the morning (so you can wake up to a warm bed, for instance). It worked alright, but then the main unit crapped out after 2 weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You should definitely be able to fix the main unit. It’s just a heat pump. The value is the tech in the mattress cover.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's actually not the pump, but the power supply that crapped out. I kept the unit because I'm sure it's just a PC power supply, but I haven't taken the time to crack it open. Oddly enough, there's no information online about what the part number might be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That sounds wonderful, to have an air gapped smart bed on open source software. Just like having the perfect nuclear missile launch system on Windows XP made by clever engineers. No updates, just dreams.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Reminds me that nurse interview in Spain during the blackout:

    "But your hospital doesn't have a backup generator?? -Oh we have solar panels, we could be running off the grid! But the power management system requires an Internet connection, and it's down!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The nurse knew that the power management system required an Internet connection? That's one geeky nurse.

    Still, I have hope with things like solar panels. I think these are likely to be teething pains there. Being off-grid on a solar panel is probably a pretty common situation, so they're probably going to eventually work out the kinks. As long as there isn't a monopoly on power management systems, or regulatory capture by the companies that make them, probably the ability to work disconnected from both the power and Internet grids will eventually happen. But, with Internet-of-Things stuff, there's often a commercial incentive to mine people's data and lock them into a subscription service model. So, that's really going to require regulation to fix.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So, what would be the community that is the opposite of buy it for life?

    Seriously, I get that internet is ubiquitous in some areas, but everything should have the ability to function correctly without internet access.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I feel like if I was gonna put a computer attached to a motor & heater inside a bed, the very first step would be making sure that if the software goes wrong, it always defaults to staying bed shaped and not catching fire.

    I know I know hindsight is 20/20, I'm sure I'm just missing something. Venture capitalists would just give their money to any random idiot with a pitch, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    why? what if they want more money and decide to make it go subscription based? do you and the shareholders want to risk people just....unplugging them and continuing to use them? the mere idea made me drop my monocle .

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    It's already subscription based lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    why do people buy these things!?!?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because their favourite YouTuber tells them how much better they're feeling after getting one.

    It's why sponsorships are an outright negative for me when looking at products. They abuse the authority influencers seem to get. "Oh I like him and his videos, he wouldn't lie to me." Yeah right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely, some youtubers are nothing but paid shills.

    On the other hand, there are some who have a lot of integrity. If TechMoan for example tells us that something actually works, I'll be very inclined to believe him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Wow, imagine having to pay a subscription to have a 2-year warranty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Who the fuck is stupid enough to buy a fucking “smart” bed. Ffs

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How about a Kohler toilet that watches you poop for an annual subscription.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    "Smart" toilets are a privacy nightmare.

    Having said that, in the distant future, if we don't drown the world, or kill ourselves in some other way, smart toilets are actually a smart idea.

    Look how often a medical check-up requires either a stool sample or a urine sample. It makes sense. It's the waste products our body produces, so there's going to be a lot of data there. Now, imagine if you could get a basic medical check-up every time you used the toilet. You could catch so many problems early. It would be an entirely non-invasive medical check-up and if done right you wouldn't even need to change your routine. You'd just use the toilet as normal and if the toilet detected anything that required a more detailed check, it could give you a packet of data you could give to your doctor.

    At the very least, imagine if instead of trying to pee into a cup at the doctor's office -- or worse, trying to collect a stool sample, you could just use the "Medical Toilet" the way you use any other toilet and it would collect the sample for you.

    But, of course, the wealth of medical information it could provide is exactly why it would be a privacy nightmare in the current world. I don't know why Kohler is jumping into this now. Even if they see it as some way to generate revenue, they have to know it's going to generate lawsuits too, and when inevitably there's a privacy breach it's going to put their good name in the toilet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    There is special category for Internet of Shit devices, that not only are cloud based but also require a persistent connection to a server to even execute basic functions.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Not that it isn’t wildly ridiculous and stupid to have an internet connected bed, but couldn’t you just unplug it if it’s overheating?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Of course someone made a bed whose controls require an API with internet access..

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    A reminder to not buy "smart" home appliances unless you can self-host it's internet connectivity or its "smart" features are optional.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    smart home appliances are tolerable if they have 0 (zero, cero, null, ling, sifr, mee-then, noll) internet access

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yup, Zigbee all the way! Although that new Matter protocol seems kinda promising as well

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    You also have wifi with tasmota or esphome. Some products come with optional cloud features turned off by default (and no automatic updates), like Shelly. You can also flash them, but the factory firmware is so unobtrusive that I don't bother.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I am more shocked that there are people who are interested in "smart" furnitures and appliance.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Smart devices are fine - it usually just means remote control or status. Plenty of use in that.

    The problem is that no one can be arsed to buy a local hub and figure out how to connect it, so every company just builds an app and makes it cloud connected. That way they can farm your stupidity.

    It’s not hard to make a device that works locally (it’s way easier than making a cloud service) but it’s far less lucrative.

    That being said if I bought a $2000 mattress cover and it didn’t work offline I’d have gotten my fucking money back.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I can completely understand it, if you ignore all the privacy issues and potential hacks.

    For example, a smart fridge. Imagine a fridge that tracks the expiry date of everything inside and warns you before something goes bad -- or detects when something goes bad based on the off-gassing that it produces. Imagine it gets to know your purchase patterns and suggests items for your grocery list when you're running low. Or, if you fully trust it, it could even order those things for you.

    Or, smart lights. Imagine lights that are nice and bright in the winter when you don't get enough sunlight. Then imagine those lights are smart enough to start dimming and getting "warmer" at a certain point in the evening on your personal schedule, making your body more prepared for sleep. Add motion / presence sensors so that the lights turn on when you go into a room, and turn off when everybody leaves the room. Most of the time a light switch isn't a burden, but if you're carrying things it can be a bit annoying, and we all know kids are pretty bad about turning things off when they leave a room.

    In a world where you didn't have to worry about the privacy issues, the bugs had all been worked out, and so-on, smart appliances could be great. But, we're on v0.1 and so I'm extremely cautious in every "smart" device I use.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    From what I've seen, it's actually a really good product. Just that the company is trash and forces subscriptions and the mattresses to be always online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    To help people with paralysis shimmy into their wheelchairs in the morning and to keep the elderly in poorly insulated homes from freezing in the night.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Waiting for the reports that cars couldn't be used because of the aws issue

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    People. You don't need this shit. I promise.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The only thing my bed has that my previous beds didn't was a removable charging outlet with USBs and stuff. That's it. That requires only electricity and is literally something that could have existed last century with no problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It adjusts temperature (can heat OR cool and in some versions it can heat one side and cool the other) and I think the even more expensive version can morph a bit to your liking, and according to them, reduce snoring.

    What they don't mention is that regardless of whether you get the 3600 euro option or the 5800 euro option, you still have to SUPPLY YOUR OWN MATTRESS. It's also a subscription service.

    If you didn't hate it enough, it's also advertised as being "powered by AI". Which almost certainly is just some temperature adjustment algorithm, maybe even a deterministic one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Here I am like a plebe using a hot water bottle when cold and less bedsheets when hot. If only I knew there was a technical solution for a problem that's already been solved hundreds of times over!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It adjusts temperature (can heat OR cool and in some versions it can heat one side and cool the other) and I think the even more expensive version can morph a bit to your liking, and according to them, reduce snoring.

    You don't need the internet to do those things though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That's definitely true, I just explained why the mattress has tech inside it in the first place. Or the mattress cover, really.

    It'd easily be accomplished with a couple of buttons too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    People who buy an internet connected bed have more dollars than sense.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ha, this reminds me of the death of the guy that gave the world lead poisoning.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    101 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    41 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    23 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post