top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 139 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Trying to keep a public torrent alive is hard work, but someone has to do it.
Back when I had VDSL and even ADSL, I'd try to hit 1.1 ratio because if everyone did that the risk of information being lost would be close to 0%. Nowadays with gigabit internet, all that prevents me from seeding is hard drive space, and 8 TB doesn't fill up quickly with how few good movies and series there are these days. I guess that's one way to stop piracy, just make fewer and worse series/movies.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    "Good" is in the eye of the beholder. Have you considered that the quality hasn't changed much, but instead you've become more discerning as you age? I certainly have far less tolerance for the stupid shit I used to think was funny long ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I'm aware of that. And if I liked copoganda I'd be swimming in shows. That's just getting older I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I get that. I used to think The Big Bang Theory was funny
    *shudder*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Depends on the comparison. Better than sitting in silence, worse than touching grass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think I would rather watch paint dry than The Big Bang Theory tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Good definitely is subjective. I have Robot Jox in my library and it won’t be deleted until I’ve left this mortal coil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I heard Crash and Burn won't be deleted either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Somehow I forgot about that one. I don’t think I ever saw it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Theoretical sequel, fun to watch if you like 90s post-apocalyptic thriller scifi, although there's barely any mecha in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Unfortunately BitTorrent clients are kinda messy and don't make it easy to maintain a long term seeding library. I've moved to qbittorrent which is a bit better than Deluge on that regard, but it's still not great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, they are messy. I tried BiglyBT a few years back, and while I love a lot of features, I think that was overkill for sure. qBittorrent is the golden standard at the moment for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also I don't understand the upload torrents limit, ok, limit concurrent uploads, but everything I'm seeding should be available all the time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is your issue that it's hard to move files around without breaking seeding, or something else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Well, that's an issue for sure, but in my case it's just that when you have thousands of torrents seeding it's hard to keep them organised and navigate them, labels help but not much, essentially my bittorrent client is a bucket of shared files, reviewing what I have, deleting and moving is a hassle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Personally I enjoy seeing the numbers go up. Looking at the current top ten by ratio according to my torrent client most of them are obscure things that I'm probably the only one seeding — but the number one spot, at a ratio of 565, goes to "Shrek (2001) [1080p]".

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Eh, mine's linuxmint-20-cinnamon-64bit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    god i even hate pausing seeding for even an hour cause i'm like BUT WHAT IF SOMEONE WANTS IT???

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    I don’t know about you guys, but I set mine to stop seeding at a 2.0 ratio. Give more than you get. That’s the way I think it should be.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    A better way is to just limit connections and upload speed and seed forever. If your total connections is like 25 and your max upload is like 100 KB/ps, it doesn't affect your internet or anything although you should use a VPN and stuff, and it helps to keep those files out there with a complete source for a long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Why would you do that? We should all keep on seeding as long as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Cause I don’t have infinite storage. My seedbox has 4TB.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    but seeding more does not cost storage. why not let it seed until you delete it?

    if it's so that you can see which ones can you delete, just click on the ratio column to sort by that, and check which ones have a higher ratio

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Because most people aren't using the files as stored in the download folder. They're renaming it, moving it to another folder, and deleting all the extra files. So you'd have to store it twice basically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    This is one of the great things about the *arrs. They will create a hardlink to the file in your media folder structure so that you can keep seeding and have a well organized/named media library without wasting storage.

    Prior to that, I also just saved my torrents directly to my media library, and used the torrent manager to rename the local file properly. Same thing effectively, just a lil more work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    As the other comment says, use hardlinks and then you can have several copies of the file across the same partition all reference the same file, using just the storage space needed for one copy of the file. Still RAR files will need to be extracted first, so those would require just about twice the file size, but hopefully people stop using rar, so that's not a concern.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    My media server is not the same as my seed box.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you're copying a file to another server there's still no reason to delete it on the seedbox until you have to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Here's a tip: after moving the folder (idk if this counts after renaming a folder or file, probably doesn't), go into your torrent client and click Force Recheck on the torrent. it'll recheck everything and continue seeding the file.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I did that.

    And rightfully so, I was a 15 year old in a third world country with a beat up compaq computer to download movies overnight. I couldn't seed cuz my father would find out I wasted the internet.

    Today, I can seed and have a 26TB hard drive, I preserve old movies in my native language (Telugu) and seed them.

    Do we need people to learn about seeding and ratios? Definitely. But I believe in

    Today's leechers are tomorrow's seeders.

    And don't blame them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I leech because i have a 1mbps upload speed and if i'm uploading using that then my download speeds tank rendering my connection useless.

    I'm moving in the next year and when i get a place with more than ADSL you bet i'm setting up a seedbox

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Sounds like you grew up and your hardware did too!

    Not everyone is able to seed unfortunately. Here the downloading aspect although not allowed seeding is when you can receive fines.

    Hence I cross seed everything to I2P.

    Of course only Linux ISOs 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Why is it called seeding but where is sperm in question?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    just had a silly idea: stopping your torrent right as it starts to seed (to avoid ISP letters) is like pulling out as a form of birth control

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yeah, but you still seed while you download

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Meta's legal defense was that they limited seeding to a minimal value as a precaution when they pirated terabytes of books. Of course, I don't expect the same ruling would be granted to an individual... Shit is fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Has the law in any jurisdiction determined that sharing some small fraction of bits is equivalent to sharing an entire series of bits? And how do they determine that? Like I’m sending 1s and 0s right now. Is that a violation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I mean, at that point everything is legal if we pretend to just send "random" 0s and 1s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But there must be some kind of burden of proof, right? If I leech 0.001% of a file, have I really pirated that file? If yes, then how small does the amount go? If no, then how large does it go? Or if they have to prove intent, well then that can go to trial…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Did a little digging around. It looks like they manage to get discovery judgments all the time over partial downloads, but I don't see them actually taking anyone to court for anything less than a full file.

    Once you have the entire file available, it's hard to shimmy around the distribution claims. Wouldn't it be super effing interesting if everyone's torrent client specifically picked a random block and refused to give it to anyone?

    I'm not sure it would hold up in court, but it would be interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That’s… not how it works. A law firm rep (usually) just has to connect to the swarm and see what IPs are there. It matters not if you share, being in the swarm is enough for them to send your ISP a notice of infringement. So as others said, use protection.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    I seed EVERYTHING until i run out of space. Qbitorrent doesn't like me having .torrent files in more than one drive, so i'm limited to my 14TB. But i have dozens of torrents that i'm only one of 2 or 3 people seeding it, so those help me upload hundreds of GB's with my terrible connection.

    Also i'm on a private tracker, so leaving them seeding helps your ratio, even if you don't actually upload anything. They just try to encourage new people to seed and that is awesome.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I suffer with seeding unpopular torrents and rarely see my ratio even each 1.0

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I mostly seed stuff that's on the verge of being lost media and my ratio is often insane because there just aren't other seeds. Ironically for many old/unpopular films the Internet Archive is a lot better than any torrents.

    The comment on this internet archive review in particular had me laughing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I would seed if people ever used me. I only have so much space, and everytime I try to seed, there's either nobody downloading, or theirs a hundred other seeders.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You guys go out and talk to girls? Disgusting, they have cooties.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    People should learn how to seed. If you don't want to seed, just pay for Usenet.

  • source
  • [+] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›