all 73 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 1 year ago (15 children)

This is going to surprise a few of you. Left with and right without:

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Wait, the lens flare effect is because of my astigmatism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's just the way things look. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    You can't convince me there's people without the amazing starburst effect, just like you can't convince me there's people completely devoid of internal monologue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    there's an infinity of human experience, and I can't put myself in everybody's shoes, but I can at least pretend

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Okay, pretend to have astigmatism for so long, it's just the way the world is to you. Then make about a ⅛ to ¼ -assed effort of making a joke comment saying that you can't believe other people don't get so easily blinded by things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    don't worry, i also have astigmatism that also doesn't go away with my glasses, and i guess mine is just very mild because i find it very pretty if a little inconvenient. but also the biggest thing i drive is a bicycle, and i usually take the tram or bus so ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    also yes i sort of accidentally intentionally missed the point. I'm sorry, I do that a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Mine doesn’t look exactly like the image on the left. It’s more of an X pattern.

    And that’s WITH glasses or contacts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mine are more like crosses which leads me to ask, why are they different?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago*

    I’m not an eye doctor - just a guy with astigmatism in both eyes… But my understanding is that astigmatism can happen in multiple ways because it is due to the eye being non-spherical, etc.

    Meanwhile, there are limits to what glasses or contacts can do to correct this. Only so many ways a lens can bend light at one time.

    I think that’s what leads to people seeing different things, even with glasses on, when it comes to visual distortions like starburst patterns around lights.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    European here, the fuck are y’all talking ’bout. I have astigmatism and LED headlights are godsend, especially low beam. They have automatic leveling which prevents blinding if you put something in the trunk, the beam is wider and more controlled than from a lightbulb and the cutoff is razor sharp. Don’t get me started on automatic high beams with zones, like magic.

    I just wonder if your experience is not swayed by illegal LED retrofits.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    The problem in the States is all of the brodozers with their headlights up so high they are shining directly into your eyes. With them being so obnoxious it's all we remember when we think about LEDs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    they are shining directly into your eyes.

    That would be illegal in most of Europe and will fail an inspection, resulting in a fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Those "trucks" are illegal in Europe, but don't worry Stellantis is trying to fix that with bribes lobbying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It ain't just the trucks, I've been blinded by early 2000s Honda Civics before. I drive a 01 Toyota Tacoma I sit comfortably above their headlights yet I still get blinded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's a completely different problem. Those are bad retrofits. Either the idiot put an LED (with a bad CRI because they like the color) into a reflector made for a halogen bulb, or they did a cheap headlight assembly swap. The bulb swap works like shit because they have completely different radiation patterns. The assembly swap is usually not optimized for the emission pattern either, and they tend to be a bad color as well because there people installing them think they look cool. Most of both of them are illegal to use in the road, but the cops don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A lot of them are actually angled correctly and are complete unit swaps the problem is the gross output of the things. I live in SoCal that means lots of relatively flat surfaces to bounce light off of even the damned dirt is reflective. Frankly I think LED headlights should be illegal unless they have a cover to break up the light or are kept to certain colors with a hard limit max output

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The cybretruck is (but i see a lot of mantrucks) but this is about headlights in any vehicle.
    You are required to have them well adjusted so you don't blind anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Id rather blame it on beam shape which in your cars are symmetrical and designed to shine straight onto opposing drivers face. Here I immediately see at night that incoming traffic is a car with LEDs because they blind me less - you must come here to believe me I guess, but check what beam shape is by law mandated in the EU. And it is much much easier to control the beam shape exactly like you want it with multi-LED headlights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Led or not, having the wrong light adjustment (height, beam shape, etc) will fail your inspection in most EU countries.

    But this led trope is a regular online... I imagine in the US they are doing all kinds of crazy shit with high power leds, because freedom or something. Damn EU gob'mint, preventing people from blinding me!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    nope, retrofits are not the main problem

    the main problem is that LED headlights are typically way too damn bright, and inevitably will end up shining in somebody's face. quite often actually

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Automatic leveling? Up until 2022, that was illegal here in the united states. There'd be very few cars with it, despite having the extremely bright headlights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Illegal?! How about cars with Xenon lights, they were also illegal? It’s mandatory in EU for cars with xenon lights to have automatic leveling, spray nozzles, limited power output and more controlled beam shape than standard bulbs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    All of that stuff that helps people from getting blinded is actually illegal here in the states. Those high beams with zones? Illegal I would love for that stuff to come here but currently we just get fucked in the eyeballs seemingly for fun

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago*

    And here I thought this was going to be about how in the corner of my eye I can see LED headlights flickering and it drives me fucking bonkers

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    LED headlights are godawful astigmatism or no. Whoever invented them should be made to stare directly into the sun for the rest of time.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Only done poorly, which sadly is most cars, even new. They are aimed too fucking high. Headlights are meant to be aimed down at the damn road. Not up high for far reach. That's the point of highbeams.

    I got projector leds for my car but i properly aimed them, the light has a sharp hard cutoff juuuuust below the windshield on Most sedans at distance to make sure I don't blind em. If i need more and it's safe I've got my highbeams which turn the road in even the darkest rural to noon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Aiming the LEDs is only a partial solution, as soon as you got a slight incline you're beaming straight into oncomers' eyes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The car designers specifically dampen their headlight output in the exact spot where regulators measure their light.

    But there's also the issue that they have way too much blue light. Blue light still damages eyes even though it's only UV adjacent and not UV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't know about regulations, but you are right about the blue light. Most white LEDs have low CRI, and that's why things look weird with them.
    The reason they use low CRI LEDs is probably because they are cheaper and produce more lumens per watt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Blue light does not damage things just because it's "adjacent to UV". And low cri is good enough for driving, you need to see whether there's a pedestrian on the side of the road, not to create a nice photographic composition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    LED headlights would be fine if they weren't infinitely bright and a shade of blue/cool white. Just make them a bit warmer and not so bright.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, what I'm saying is that there are rules about how much you are allowed to blind everyone else and car designers are specifically circumventing them.

    It would also be nice if they were a more pleasant colour.

    The reason why car designers do this is because it sells more cars. People feel safer in a huge SUV / "truck" when though they aren't. People also feel safer when they can light everything up even though they aren't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I mean, it's certainly better if they're dipped properly, but each individual LED is still far too bright.

    A scooter with a ring of single LEDs on it drove past me once - I guess they were some sort of cosmetic thing - and they were still dazzlingly bright in full daylight.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Imagine how I feel now that where I live, the governor decided to buy hundreds of busses of the same color and a big LED sign with white letters and dark background 😦

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    My issue with LED lights is the flicker. It's not astigmatism that's affecting me, I don't know what it is. But, I'm sure that other people don't have this same sensitivity to flicker otherwise these flickering LED lights would never have been legal.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    If that's your vision, y'all need glasses.

    I have astigmatism. My glasses correct it. Led lights are fine.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 36 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Eyeglass prescriptions that correct for astigmatism have one "axis" or direction that can be specified. Real astigmatism can be vastly more complex than a single diopter adjustment in one direction. This makes many real astigmatism cases effectively uncorrectable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Is it unfixable with lenses or only unfix able without lenses custom designed for your eye?

    If that makes sense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    To correct any possible astigmatism, it would require an infinite sum of series of correction terms at different angles and strengths.

    But every glasses prescription I've ever gotten in the United States cuts that series off at one term. I've never seen nor heard of anyone getting custom lenses with two or more axes. It seems like it should be theoretically possible, but I also know very little about the process of lens grinding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My understanding is that it’s just a limitation of the physical medium of a glass (or plastic) lens. There’s just only so much it can do - and only so many directions a lens can bend light at the same time before it enters your eye.

    I have no complaints, despite the persistent starburst around lights at night. It’s not that big a deal. And I’ve never seen them any other way, after all.

    My only other quibble is that my prescription makes everything look a little bit wider than it actually is. Either that, or my astigmatisms (one in each eye, and different from each other too!) make everything look more narrow than it really is? I’ve never really been sure….

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Oh yeah. The starburst patterns absolutely are an unavoidable artifact of the axis correction in the lens. They are the result of diffraction doing Fourier optics on point light sources through an anisotropic (non-directionally symmetric) lens system.

    As an example, here's the James Webb Space Telescope, which has a hexagonal starburst pattern because its primary mirror is composed of hexagons (I believe the smaller horizontal spike is from the secondary mirror support strut):

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Sorry, but you're wrong. I'm happy for you everything works but for lots of people they can either have clear eyesight or no issues with light sources in the dark.

    And damn, those glasses are expensive!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Do they make glasses that just fix astigmatism? I have great vision and don't need glasses for sight. But I do have gnarly astigmatism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It depends on your specific flavor of astigmatism. You'd have to get your eyeballs thoroughly checked out by a fancy eyeball doctor to know if yours can be corrected with glasses (or contacts) or not. Some can be, some can't be, some can be partially corrected. At least that's how the fancy eyeball doctors explained it to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)