all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

I can't understand how in this political climate the Liberals think it's a good idea to open our private data up to the US.

"Elbows up"? Bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    We (collectively) gave them a chance. They’ve proven unable to keep promises or work for the best interest of all Canadians in good faith. The time to start prepping to beat them is now.

    My MNA did not respond to my letter on C-2almost two months ago.

    I’m going to work to make sure he’s not re-elected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (19 children)

    It hasn't even been a year!!! Sheesh!

    Edit: I can't believe we're here already. At a point where we already want a new government, I mean. But I warned people during the elections that they were going to be disappointed after voting liberal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well most Canadians don't want a new government and are happy with Carney. Us here just see the trend signs early and where they're gonna lead ahead of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Really?? Canadians are happy with him? That's not the vibe I'm getting. Even my parents who are hard core liberals are disappointed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's been 34 seconds since the election. Like my god, I mean I don't think I was super excited to vote Liberal (have I ever been?), but holy friggin hell it's been like .2 seconds. Let's give the guy some breathing room.

    Things are in flux, and quite chaotic. I don't care who you are, or what color you rep. Whether it's green, purple, red, blue or manure brown. This timeline we are on is for the birds, and you got nothing to win here, everything to lose.

    He's not done everything I've wanted him to either, he's definitely made what I think history will likely show as some misteps on his negotiations with the Americans but yikes, give the guy some runway. Meanwhile his adversary has been parading around central Alberta the past month. Riding an ATV without a helmet and pretending he's a cowboy, in a riding that would declare an empty bucket of paint as grand emperor as long as it promised to be a racist, anti-abortion, anti vax piece of shit. That's what it's taken him to have a voice. So do you think he'd be any better? What about Jagmeet or the NDP. Where are the NDP? Probably hiding with Nenshi in Alberta, because ain't no one seen him lately either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah but Jagmeet stepped down. He's no longer the party leader for the NDP.

    Yeah the Cons are worst, but only on a moral level. Because so far the Liberal party has been on the same level as the Cons economically. Cutting government jobs to cut costs, working with oil companies to push for a big oil pipeline project to sell to Europe. Eroding our rights to privacy with a Canadian version of the Patiot act. Not applying counter tarrifs on American resources, to the advantage of the American economy and our detriment. I mean, those things will have lasting consequences. And that's just the first impression he's giving.

    I don't think I want to wait to see what comes next.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    There's no one left to elect we would be happy with.

    The NDP is an absolute mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Quote true but at least they would not be passing all these draconian laws taking all our rights away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    Of course, but they would never be elected. I would 100% vote for NDP if they had a glimmer of chance, they did so bad their party almost disappeared.

    It was a vote against the conservatives, who would cause direct harm to our independence and marginalized communities.

    What we have here is a different kind of evil. Neither evils are acceptable, but it is a quantifiably lesser evil. We, as the people, have to twist their arms to make them do our bidding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That is how I voted hoping liberals might be less evil. I just wonder now if there is any differences between these 2 evils anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You had a choice between Shit and Shit Light. Giant douche and a Turd Sandwich.

    I mean it beats the alternative down south. Not sure those folks are going to really have an opportunity to have a choice anymore, the way events are unfolding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That's just stupid. If everybody simply thinks that, of course it'll never happen. We have to change this mentality.

    Also, I honestly think a minority conservative government with a strong NDP with whom the Liberals would've had to work with would've been a better outcome than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    We need to get rid of FPTP, which the liberals promised to do years ago.

    The NDP might get rid of FPTP, but we were not guaranteed a strong NDP this election, so we may have simply ended up with a CON / LIB government had we voted for NDP in greater numbers.

    We should chat about this over Matrix if you're willing :) I think both viewpoints are valid, it's really just a question of risk to reward.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Um.....I hate to be the person to tell you, on the last paragraph...so I mean the last four years..the Liberals and NDP...yeah. And that didn't go so hot.

    NDP is an absolute train wreck, and has been for quite some time save for some really tiny glimmers of hope here and there. As much as I dislike the current landscape, and as much as I don't feel represented, I'm quite sure the NDP wasn't the answer either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Train wreck?

    They were the 3rd party in a minority Liberal government with the Cons as official opposition. And they STILL managed to pass a few of their bills that improved the quality of life of middle class Canadians. That's a win in my book. Unfortunately the Libs took credit for what they did.

    But people also forget the dynamic of a minority gouvernent and how they have to make compromises between each other. And so the NDP got shit on for essentially working with the Libs. But how else would they have gotten anything passed? They made made compromises on both sides, but somehow the NDP got the blame.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    On the last part, that's how minority governments work. The NDP were just puppets, used for their votes, and nothing more. Sure they were made to feel like the popular kid, but you are right, they took the fall on anything unpopular. They maybe even got a few things done, but did they really? That pharmacy care coverage thing for example, it's been such a shoddy implementation and some of the provinces are ignoring it. It's almost like it was designed not to work...

    Meanwhile the Liberals got almost four solid years of gears, thanks to the Dippers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They would still have been better than wherever the fuck we have right now. They wouldn't have voted to force the return to work of the Air Canada employees for one.

    They would also have put pressure on provincial governments to improve public healthcare services instead of letting them fuck over the system to push for private services. Etc.

    They would've been so much better. Even if they are a mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    ...how would they have won is my question.

    There was near 0% probability of them winning, and almost 50% probability of the cons winning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, basically. We did the lesser evil given the scenario at that point in time. Now we have to position the alternative to be in a viable state by the election. Failing that, it'll be the lesser evil again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe I’m nuts but far as I am concerned Carney is not any different than rump at this point. The only difference I see between liberal and conservative now is the conservatives admit they want fascist shit. Carney and gang a slinking around pretending.

    I will never vote liberal again in my life. The trust has been broken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Well they're similar in some regards and different in others. Apart from the cons being actively harmful towards various marginalized groups, here's how they might differ in handling this labour dispute. In the lib case, we have them going through the legal framework with the union and Air Canada, and they wanted force arbitration, which while not as good as the union could get would have likely produced meaningful improvements to the workers' contract. A con like PP would have likely said that the union has been infiltrated by radical woke left lunatics and no longer serves the interests of the workers. He would have then singled out these workers as unreasonable and bad, and gone on to say how they are harming the rest of the good workers with their strike. Then he'd go hard on them in various ways. For example by emergency amending labour law to make it easy to bust the union, as well as others in the future, and to make it more difficult to organize in the first place. If he were extra nasty, he could have picked up some of the pro-Palestine messages said by various CUPE leaders and declare it/them supporters of terrorism or some shit like that and sanction them from that avenue as well. With this in mind, consider that the state can do a lot more to make life difficult for workers and while the libs aren't doing nearly enough to avoid us descending into fascism, the cons under someone like PP won't be afraid to use their power to increase labour exploitation at behest of their donors. Either way we need a strong, unapologetically worker-focused NDP but the libs aren't nearly anti-worker as the PP cons would likely be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    That’s why we can’t have any nice things :(

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I'm trying to think of that saying about opening or closing the barn door but can't remember it. In either case, the gist is they've already been surveilling us all along so this news means very little.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thank you for posting but this is a duplicate post of https://lemmy.ca/post/48616498

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ah, sorry, my search missed it. Did I also double post? Sorry, still figuring Lemmy out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If this bill passes then it's finally time I get a VPN to another country.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It’s been time for a long time… according to today’s sponsor NordVPN

    Also don’t get nord. Highly recommend torguard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    How are the speeds? Nord is shit but I can't lower the already shit speeds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Once the VPN has tracking for law enforcement or the government the VPN is trash. Privacy is bullshit and it doesn't actually prevent you from being spied on if they wanted too. I should be able to protect myself from the government especially considering all of the countries now are enshittifying themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 8 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    media isnt covering this at all like they should be. the fact that all we hear about it "Carney owning trump" when hes literally planning on screwing our constitutional right to privacy, and giving that information to literally the worst possible fascist rapist, whos planning on economically annexing us is suspicious to say the least.

    once this pandoras box is opened, theres no closing it. he just wrote an executive order saying they are going to arrest homeless people and whoever they classify as "mentally ill" which will include people who are LGBTQ+ and have ADHD and autism, and anyone who doesnt agree with him politically because they have "trump derangement syndrome" which they are trying to classify as a mental illness as we speak.

    now imagine if in the future trump or the US do end up annexing us, or at least demanding who they deem a threat from our side of border to be charged in the US. they could literally take homeless people and the "mentally ill" or anyone they deem a "threat" and ship them over to put them in fucking work camps. now with our online profile fully in view of the US, and palantir (FOREVER), they could demand "domestic threats" be sent over. removing would be resistors to the trump regime take over, before they want to annex us for good. and classify them as mentally ill, and then force them to work as slaves in their work camps, or worse. JUST LIKE STALIN DID WITH HITLER BEFORE THEY ENDED UP GOING TO WAR.

    even if thats not what they are planning, they could use our data to create extremely targeted misinformation campaigns and have canadians continue to vote against their interests in the future.

    i hope my tinfoil hat isnt too tight on my head, but fuck me what the hell, this is a national security A BOMB going off in our own legislation by our own government. that we specifically elected to FIGHT THIS DICKWAD. not hand us over on a silver platter.

    theres zero benefit to this bill for canadians, ZERO.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    what Canadians even want this? do we strike you as a government that should have access to your privacy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    we dont want this, most dont even know about it. they are far too busy comparing Carney to PP in "what ifs" (fuck him too, btw) the liberals got hoodwinked into a conservative government that claims its center left.

    they are claimings its due to the american threat and the threat of other internationals, hence why its shoved into the "strong borders act"

    they are using fear of immigrants, again, to take away our rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    the liberals got hoodwinked into a conservative government that claims its center left.

    Same as in the UK. People vote against the genuinely terrible Conservatives only to end up with a different authoritarian neoliberal government. This is a class war, but most people don't realize it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    that's some insane "I used the US overreach to stop US overreach" logic. I'm sorry we seem to have transmitted our retardation to your most impressionable voters.

    Wait also, people who want strong borders in Canada. Is that to keep out American immigrants, who are also known for our xenophobia and populism? Because we have this similar thing going on with Hispanics where the people who want to keep them from immigrating north happen to have the exact same cultural values as the people they're trying to keep out. It would be funny if this was just like a Jacob's Ladder of immigration anxieties

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    its part of it. to make a very complex issue short. (mainly) conservative premiers wanted cheap labour during covid because most of us were in lockdown, we also have an ageing population and low birth rate. and they wanted business to function and grow, supplemented by a foreign workforce. they petitioned the fed to let more immigrants, refugees, asylum seekers, temp workers and students in to fill the gaps, going so far as to lie about their ability to house them efficiently. fed delivered. it pumped the economy, available housing shrunk, wages stagnated. when we recovered post covid. conservatives started blaming the fed as if it was all their plan the whole time when the cracks started showing, taking zero responsibility. this is the main reason why trudeau, our former PM was so unpopular. eventually he quit, passed it off to Carney who eventually was elected over populist maple maga PP, because he said he would fight trump. the NDP (further left than the liberals) shrunk to unofficial party status (losing federal funding) because "Carney was our best shot" and now we have a functionally two party system as a result. Carneys politics as a "center left liberal" also shifted the overton window further right.

    hes a banker, and is the richest PM in canadian history, and is currently passing laws for "nation building projects" that allow big business to step over first nations rights, and citizens rights as well (bill c-5). building things like cross provincial pipelines that further push us towards climate collapse. because neoliberalism demands environmental sacrifice at the altar of profit and the fairytail of infinite growth.

    Carney is merely another puppet of the international oligarch elite, put in place to smash and grab resources and our rights, before class conciousness can rear its head and destroy the status quo, and systems of capitalism that aim to destroy democracy and the planet. he put his stock holdings in a "blind trust" as a show of good faith, but is actively invested in american corps and holdings, and the trust, isnt entirely blind. meaning he can change policy to enrich himself and friends further.

    his smiles and winks are supposed to trick us into thinking he has some grandmaster plan up his sleeve to deal with trump. but he and virtually every other politician alive never represent the will of the people, just the will of the elite. its a big fucking show.

    for the record. PP is a cunt. Carney is cunt lite with a smile and a (now slightly lowered) rainbow flag.

    ive never been more dissapointed in a prime minister in my life.

    he was supposed to help us. now he dooms us all for a spot in the bunker.

    edit: just to add on to this, i feel just as bad for the immigrants who were lied to about the opportunities canada offered. we turned doctors and engineers into what are essentially wage slaves. and they are now a political tool whos dream of a better life lies on the whims of corrupted algorithm that dictates the thoughts of the masses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Not only is this a terrible bill, but the timing of it is especially telling. We're in a fight for our sovereignty and he wants to hand our data over to the people threatening us.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    This isn’t speculation. Earlier this month, a Canadian government official told Politico that this surveillance regime would give Canadian police “the same kind of toolkit” that their U.S. counterparts have under the PATRIOT Act and FISA. The bill allows for “technical capability orders.” Those orders mean the government can force Canadian tech companies, VPNs, cloud providers, and app developers—regardless of where in the world they are based—to build surveillance tools into their products.

    Under U.S. law, non-U.S. persons have little protection from foreign surveillance. If U.S. cops want information on abortion access, gender-affirming care, or political protests happening in Canada—they’re going to get it. The data-sharing won’t necessarily be limited to the U.S., either. There’s nothing to stop authoritarian states from demanding this new trove of Canadians’ private data that will be secretly doled out by its law enforcement agencies.

    This bill is being introduced by a minister that the pm hand picked himself. Mark Carney is selling out Canadians!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    This bill is being introduced by a minister that the pm hand picked himself

    all ministers are

    Mark Carney is selling out Canadians!

    correct, he is doing exactly the opposite he promised as a candidate

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I think many of us have forgotten that Harper signed an agreement with the US in 2012 (that took effect on January 17, 2025) where "... the automated exchange of biographical and biometric information on permanent residents of both Canada and the United States" is now shared.

    Bill C-2 is simply part 2 of Harper's continued bullshit legacy that continues to haunt us years later.

    https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/notices/regulatory-amendments-canada-united-states-information-sharing-agreement.html

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Personally my reaction to most of C-2 is mild disappointment, but Part 15 is extremely concerning to me.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So we have the EU and their bullshit (which also has global scope), we have credit card processors and their bullshit, now we have Canada and some.of their own bullshit.

    On one hand, we have been talking about the potential for full surveillance across the internet for a while, so this is hardly a surprise, but everyone all at once? What the hell is behind this new massive push?

    It seems that the response to this will be a lot of services moving to countries that dont give a shit about us/EU laws and a rise in cryptocurrencies. It will take a while before the common folks to get pissed enough to figure it out, but all things have limits.

    I presume there will be a patchwork of country-level blocks put into place, VPN blocks, tor filtering etc. This feels like the end of the open internet as we know it. It has been a greed fueled mess for a long time now, but this round of government invasion feels like the final knife in the chest.

    It will suck for users, it will be expensive for any company to maintain compliance, it will be horribly complex from a technology perspective if any of these layers break and it will be a goddamn nightmare to secure. Organized crime hackers are going to have a field day once they get access to all the stuff being monitored and logged. Encryption backdoors will take it to a whole new level.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    This bill has me finally thinking about getting a VPN. Then I thought, which country would I send my traffic to, anyways? Seems many are going squirrelly at the moment, and it will only get worse over time.

    Might need to start finding onion sites to chat on, like old forum styles, and onion high seas etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago*

    The wealthy are scared and they are directing their minions to implement this.

    You see things like this more and more, when the housing market in Canada really started shifting and climbing in costs, the same systems were put in place in the UK and in Aus, NZ. To me it seemed too coordinated, is the same everytime one of the 5 eyes starts something and tries to make it seem like it's to "protect the children" or whatever.

    They are so scared of the people riding up against the ultra wealthy, this is why it is being done. It is a coordinated effort, they debt it and try to pretend they are being strong against the TACO regime, but that is only a show for their citizens, when really they're putting all of this in place. They know their in trouble with all the lies and theft affairs their people, most likely mass layoffs are coming in the next few years and they want to be able to have a nice big list of names of who to go after.

    The entire political systems globally need to change to allow everyone to have a decent standard of living.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Civil liberties groups, refugee advocates, lawyers, Amnesty International, Oxfam, the United Church, PEN Canada, CUPE, Canadian Anti-Hate Network, the YWCA, Citizen Lab — and now the EFF. The diversity and the sheer number of civil society groups and NGOs that find C-2 absolutely unacceptable is unprecedented to my knowledge. If it comes anywhere near passing into law it will be a travesty of government.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Took a quick look for coverage in various news outlets, but it seems like they're glossing over the breach of privacy and focusing on keeping the border safe lol.

    Either that or I suck at looking for coverage in mainstream media. Most of what I found was from June

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Reminds me of the patriot act.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacycanada@lemmy.ca view that post