I'm trying to remember if Marvel likes the US military. Aren't they always turning out to be secretly controlled by HYDRA or something? I also seem to recall that Iron Man decided he couldn't trust them with weapons and invented his suit so that he could do all of his killing personally.
post
They go and stand in front of a mirror? I don't get it.
It's high time we reintroduce the intermission... in the third dimension.


I saw Interstellar in a classy New Zealand theater that gave creatively-cooked meals during an intermission. I feel like that would be a well-appreciated change of pace for a lot of people.
Brutalist having an intermission was so nice and made me realize how much I'd love more movies to have this. Sadly I don't think we'll see this being done more as that little extra time probably cuts into the amount of showings you can do in a day.
...the military doesn't come off in a good light in any of the movies that isn't the first Cap, and even then they're antagonistic by sidelining one of their best chances at winning due to bureaucratlcy.
the military also requests that any movie, must paint them in a postive light, if they are using some of thier equipment or even tech. thats probably why they never are seen as bad guys.
Not to mention that every single movie has the same plot. But more meta each time
Wait. Wait. Wait. This one has a black guy as the protagonist. How about a woman. What if they are all alians. Or hear me out. All ultra wealthy?
First scene reveals the Villain
Imo, the worst shit is the multiverse shit that makes it all meaningless. If they don't like how they told the story, they will just make up a new version and say multiverse and you are the idiot for saying that it doesn't make sense in another way because multiverse.
An repetitive story with no meaningful content for the franchise and no interest in consistency.
Multiverse is just the gg ez way to do a reboot with even less effort lol
This is how I feel about comic book stories in general. Due to the nature of the medium, they have to constantly come up with new stories with the same set of characters to keep it fresh…eventually the well runs dry.
Seriously! It's almost as if movies were never meant to be bottomless well of cash for wealthy investors, but rather some kind of "art" that takes time and special knowledge and genuine care from an "artist..."
Ah, there I go again.
That's why there were so many characters. New characters were invented. New crossovers. New story arcs.
I was floored at just how many MCU movies in the past ten years I didn't know about. No fuckin wonder people are getting burnt out on it.
For me it's the juvenile plot and vapid dialogue. But sure, the retconning too.
Not like stories without a multiverse aspect have any more meaning. If someone has an interesting story to tell but it conflicts with some other aspect of a larger storyline (but works well with the rest), why not branch it off so it can stay internally consistent with its own story and not have to worry about what some other producers thought would be cool?
It's the people who think you're an idiot for not following every variation or understanding which ones go together who are the assholes. They are also the idiots themselves IMO for putting so much importance on knowledge of a set of fictional universes (and I say this as a geek who loves diving in to fictional universes, I just understand not all such dives are equal and my own deeper dives don't make me better than anyone).
I don't care about other people. And it is not about what another producer thought.
It is literally that I can hear that a character that I liked died but I honestly don't care because 1. I don't care about this shit and 2. I know the character will be back.
Let me contrast it with star wars because I think it becomes pretty obvious there.
The story becomes meaningless because I know that that the whole team that created the media knew that they don't have to care. Disney decided to reboot star wars and they are doing great job in ruining something great by been unable to commit to a plan too. But for my enjoyment of star wars legends, I can easily ignore the current canon. When something happened in legends, you had a reasonable expectation that it will stay meaningful for the rest of the franchise. Now with the badly executed reboot, at least for rn, I can assume that the people who died in those movies are dead and will stay dead. The next movie will not have magically a dead character inside because multiverse. Movie A has an impact if movies B to Z. And yes, Lucas Art fucked the Legends story up at times but guess what.... That is life.
"But in the last movie [redacted] comes back to life" yes quite a disappointing writing from Disney. It reads like marvel.
"But in the clone wars, [redacted] came back to life" yes and no, imo one of the mistakes while I like the character. But importantly the character technically was never shown dead and it was a plot twist and his "death" had actually a long term impact on the events of the story, making it meaningful for the story.
Both of those characters returned in the original versions before Disney threw out the EU stuff btw. And the first one was IMO done in a satisfying way (unlike the Disney version where he's just kinda back).
But yeah, I can see some of your points, like having to keep track of more things and not necessarily being able to use information from previous movies to inform the current one.
I can't stand the multiverse write off, even "what if" (which I personally loved at first) started to suffer with the whole strange being the bbeg arc.
Guardians of the Galaxy 3 and Deadpool & Wolverine were good. Nothing since then has looked interesting.
Thunderbolts and Fantastic Four were both really good. Actually, I thought Ironheart was really good too.
It really feels like every other movie since Endgame has been really good or really bad.
Ant-Man 3, The Marvels, and Captain America 4 were various degrees of not good.
Echo and Secret Invasion weren't good either (actually, I think overall the shows have had a better track record overall).
I agree. I haven't seen Thunderbolts yet, but I just saw Fantastic Four last night and thought it was actually really good compared to a lot of the other recent Marvel movies. Even the ones I liked all felt like they had the same script more or less, but this one it seemed like they went for less action and easy jokes and just focused on the characters and the story. I liked it a lot.
Fantastic Four is good? I'll have to see it at some point, then. Those poor characters have never managed to be in a good movie before now, so I kinda forgot there was a new MCU one.
the og ones, that were pre-disney were better than the current FF4, better actors too. although it was alsoa bad movie.
It's pretty much the perfect Fantastic Four movie. They're actually characters in this one instead of caricatures of their main personality traits.
And it's lighter on action and heavier on the story. Without giving away too much, it feels a lot more appropriate for the characters.
With Ironheart, the show is okay, but there's just no way to make the main character work. Unless they transition the character to be a villain.
I found Deadpool & Wolverene supremely painful. Matter of taste I suppose. Haven't seen any other dress-up movies in a while.
Haven't seen any other dress-up movies in a while.
Isn’t every movie a dress-up movie?
What did you find painful about it? While I dont think it was historic level cinema, I fid find it entertaining.
Not OP but personally the plot was a monumental example of wasted potential with regards to the plot. The villain's motivations being the poorest.
Even then, fight scenes between basically immortal self-healing characters are a snoozefest. Add that to the imo hit-but-mostly-miss humour and you're just waiting for the credits to roll really.
I honestly think I'd rather watch Eternals, and that was pretty bad too.
I mean... The fight between Deadpool and Wolverine was basically just a giant sex scene.
Are you going to name something you like so we can shit all over your tastes, or just point at things you hate like a coward? One might say, and I will, that you're dumb if you go into a movie like Deadpool and Wolverine looking for a cinematic masterpiece rather than fan service and violence.
I don't mind a good bit of fanservice and violence, but that's also kind of why I felt D&W was a bit disappointing. The fanservice was kinda mediocre as a lot of characters were just "mentioned" rather than properly explored, and as I said violence between unkillable characters is kinda dull. I have enjoyed a lot of the other Marvel movies though, most of them even (and that includes stuff like Age of Ultron and Iron Man 3 that a lot of people seem to like shitting on). Non-Marvel I quite liked the Dungeons & Dragons movie, I thoroughly enjoyed that one. It's not a cinematic masterpiece or anything, but the characters are likable and have some depth and development, there's a decent plot going on and there's enough fanservice for DnD fans to go around.
No need to get so defensive if someone doesn't like something you like.
I definitely agree with you that DnD was legit, it deserved far more attention than it got, and not just for the writing and performances.
You can call that defensiveness if you like; I think that downplays the intent of pointing out the constant barrage of painfully biased internet whiners regarding anything comic book related at play culturally, but I'd argue there's an objective measure that's unfair in your criticism. In D&W the interpersonal violence is an extension of emotional processing, and an expression of who the characters are, and also why they are uniquely suited to help each other heal in ways their powers can't help with. Basically, violence is all they know and how they both solve all their problems, and being unkillable gives an opportunity to work out other traumas without they typical consequence of ending people who would want to help. But yeah of course there's an element of bias at play for all of us, and flaws in every movie to varying degrees.
Lol simmer down, bud. You didn't make the movie; you just liked it. No need to take it personally
bud
Downvoted
I think I responded to the wrong person initially, but can I ask why saying "bud" is bad?
Because you're using language to try to "win" an argument simply by infantilising the opposition.
That's not what happened
What was your goal then?
To tell someone to chill out. I could have said man or pal or friend, but I chose "bud" this time. I don't think it's an infantilizing term at all
Hmm, ok. Bud can come off a little condescending but I see you meant no ill will.
To be honest, I see your point now. Thanks for working through it with me
There is a significant difference between something being entertaining to watch in the moment, and it being good.
I watched D&W in theaters with my boyfriend. Had a deadpool themed margarita. Had an excellent time, highly recommend.
Hours after leaving the theater, I started actually thinking about the movie. The more I thought about it the more I decided that it actually wasn't very good. At the time, I had a detailed list of complaints. I've forgotten the details since then.
The broad strokes though, it's insulting.
D&W actively disregards and insults established MCU canon. They had a chance to expand the lore, instead they shat on it.
The best moments in the movie could be described as "HEY! HERE'S THAT THING YOU LIKE!!! YOU LIKE THIS RIGHT?!?! LIKE THIS!!!" Which is the most disrespectful kind of reference you can do, as it's insulting to the media and even more so to the audience.
Ryan Renolds has a writing credit for this movie, and he has demonstrated that he fundamentally does not understand the metaphysics of marvel comics. Therefore, his commentary on the state of the MCU can fuck off. Sure, the later MCU movies had a lot of problems, but I can tell that myself, I have the power of media literacy on my side, so I can tell when the pot is calling the kettle black.
If I were willing to actually put effort into it, I could come up with actual examples to go with my complaints, but I don't feel like watching the movie again any time soon.
Did you like the first 2 Deadpool movies? If so, what was worse about this one?
It was lazy, it just did the same as before without adding anything new. It felt like watching the first one on repeat, sped up.
Huh, I think that just wrong. The character of Deadpool is still him, which would be strange to change, but I think alot of it was unexplored before and an interesting contribution to the Loki storyverse. Also Hugh Jackman did a great job reprising the role of wolverine.
Deadpool is a meta character, but despite that (or because of it?) I think it's a fresh take on the state of the MCU each time, taking pot shots at the existing formula from within it.
the first 2 was definitely better, as its more isolated and stand alone.
Different person. But I thought the first two were genuinely good movies.
The third felt like an excuse for cameos and jokes. It was entertaining, but not necessarily good.
seemed alot more cringey than the last 2 deadpools, more personal stories. and they fell for the multi-versal slop.
Is it Spider-Men or Spider-Mans?
Spider-Mans. Spider-Man is a proper noun so you generally don't change it and just as pluralization to the end

top 81 comments