top 81 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 61 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

I'm trying to remember if Marvel likes the US military. Aren't they always turning out to be secretly controlled by HYDRA or something? I also seem to recall that Iron Man decided he couldn't trust them with weapons and invented his suit so that he could do all of his killing personally.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Early on up until the first Avengers they were, but that movie strained the relationship due to how much the DoD wanted to meddle in the production. They didn't like the helicarriers due to realism, for example. And you can see shit like F-35's on the flight deck, national guard doing their thing during the invasion, Captain America straight up using an M4, things like that.

    After that movie, the influence the DoD had was much more subtle if it was there at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    After that movie, the influence the DoD had was much more subtle if it was there at all.

    Their involvement is blatant. They literally have a near century long intimate relationship with Hollywood as a well established recruitment tactic. It's hardly a secret.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93entertainment_complex

    https://www.military.com/undertheradar/2018/03/22/how-why-defense-department-works-hollywood.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They go and stand in front of a mirror? I don't get it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's high time we reintroduce the intermission... in the third dimension.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Brutalist having an intermission was so nice and made me realize how much I'd love more movies to have this. Sadly I don't think we'll see this being done more as that little extra time probably cuts into the amount of showings you can do in a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    ...the military doesn't come off in a good light in any of the movies that isn't the first Cap, and even then they're antagonistic by sidelining one of their best chances at winning due to bureaucratlcy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Not to mention that every single movie has the same plot. But more meta each time

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wait. Wait. Wait. This one has a black guy as the protagonist. How about a woman. What if they are all alians. Or hear me out. All ultra wealthy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago* (13 children)

    Imo, the worst shit is the multiverse shit that makes it all meaningless. If they don't like how they told the story, they will just make up a new version and say multiverse and you are the idiot for saying that it doesn't make sense in another way because multiverse.

    An repetitive story with no meaningful content for the franchise and no interest in consistency.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is how I feel about comic book stories in general. Due to the nature of the medium, they have to constantly come up with new stories with the same set of characters to keep it fresh…eventually the well runs dry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Seriously! It's almost as if movies were never meant to be bottomless well of cash for wealthy investors, but rather some kind of "art" that takes time and special knowledge and genuine care from an "artist..."

    Ah, there I go again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not like stories without a multiverse aspect have any more meaning. If someone has an interesting story to tell but it conflicts with some other aspect of a larger storyline (but works well with the rest), why not branch it off so it can stay internally consistent with its own story and not have to worry about what some other producers thought would be cool?

    It's the people who think you're an idiot for not following every variation or understanding which ones go together who are the assholes. They are also the idiots themselves IMO for putting so much importance on knowledge of a set of fictional universes (and I say this as a geek who loves diving in to fictional universes, I just understand not all such dives are equal and my own deeper dives don't make me better than anyone).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't care about other people. And it is not about what another producer thought.

    It is literally that I can hear that a character that I liked died but I honestly don't care because 1. I don't care about this shit and 2. I know the character will be back.

    Let me contrast it with star wars because I think it becomes pretty obvious there.

    The story becomes meaningless because I know that that the whole team that created the media knew that they don't have to care. Disney decided to reboot star wars and they are doing great job in ruining something great by been unable to commit to a plan too. But for my enjoyment of star wars legends, I can easily ignore the current canon. When something happened in legends, you had a reasonable expectation that it will stay meaningful for the rest of the franchise. Now with the badly executed reboot, at least for rn, I can assume that the people who died in those movies are dead and will stay dead. The next movie will not have magically a dead character inside because multiverse. Movie A has an impact if movies B to Z. And yes, Lucas Art fucked the Legends story up at times but guess what.... That is life.

    "But in the last movie [redacted] comes back to life" yes quite a disappointing writing from Disney. It reads like marvel.

    "But in the clone wars, [redacted] came back to life" yes and no, imo one of the mistakes while I like the character. But importantly the character technically was never shown dead and it was a plot twist and his "death" had actually a long term impact on the events of the story, making it meaningful for the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Both of those characters returned in the original versions before Disney threw out the EU stuff btw. And the first one was IMO done in a satisfying way (unlike the Disney version where he's just kinda back).

    But yeah, I can see some of your points, like having to keep track of more things and not necessarily being able to use information from previous movies to inform the current one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (37 children)

    Guardians of the Galaxy 3 and Deadpool & Wolverine were good. Nothing since then has looked interesting.

  • source
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Thunderbolts and Fantastic Four were both really good. Actually, I thought Ironheart was really good too.

    It really feels like every other movie since Endgame has been really good or really bad.

    Ant-Man 3, The Marvels, and Captain America 4 were various degrees of not good.

    Echo and Secret Invasion weren't good either (actually, I think overall the shows have had a better track record overall).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I agree. I haven't seen Thunderbolts yet, but I just saw Fantastic Four last night and thought it was actually really good compared to a lot of the other recent Marvel movies. Even the ones I liked all felt like they had the same script more or less, but this one it seemed like they went for less action and easy jokes and just focused on the characters and the story. I liked it a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Fantastic Four is good? I'll have to see it at some point, then. Those poor characters have never managed to be in a good movie before now, so I kinda forgot there was a new MCU one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's pretty much the perfect Fantastic Four movie. They're actually characters in this one instead of caricatures of their main personality traits.

    And it's lighter on action and heavier on the story. Without giving away too much, it feels a lot more appropriate for the characters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (28 children)

    I found Deadpool & Wolverene supremely painful. Matter of taste I suppose. Haven't seen any other dress-up movies in a while.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Haven't seen any other dress-up movies in a while.

    Isn’t every movie a dress-up movie?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    What did you find painful about it? While I dont think it was historic level cinema, I fid find it entertaining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Not OP but personally the plot was a monumental example of wasted potential with regards to the plot. The villain's motivations being the poorest.

    Even then, fight scenes between basically immortal self-healing characters are a snoozefest. Add that to the imo hit-but-mostly-miss humour and you're just waiting for the credits to roll really.

    I honestly think I'd rather watch Eternals, and that was pretty bad too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (12 children)

    Are you going to name something you like so we can shit all over your tastes, or just point at things you hate like a coward? One might say, and I will, that you're dumb if you go into a movie like Deadpool and Wolverine looking for a cinematic masterpiece rather than fan service and violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I don't mind a good bit of fanservice and violence, but that's also kind of why I felt D&W was a bit disappointing. The fanservice was kinda mediocre as a lot of characters were just "mentioned" rather than properly explored, and as I said violence between unkillable characters is kinda dull. I have enjoyed a lot of the other Marvel movies though, most of them even (and that includes stuff like Age of Ultron and Iron Man 3 that a lot of people seem to like shitting on). Non-Marvel I quite liked the Dungeons & Dragons movie, I thoroughly enjoyed that one. It's not a cinematic masterpiece or anything, but the characters are likable and have some depth and development, there's a decent plot going on and there's enough fanservice for DnD fans to go around.

    No need to get so defensive if someone doesn't like something you like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I definitely agree with you that DnD was legit, it deserved far more attention than it got, and not just for the writing and performances.

    You can call that defensiveness if you like; I think that downplays the intent of pointing out the constant barrage of painfully biased internet whiners regarding anything comic book related at play culturally, but I'd argue there's an objective measure that's unfair in your criticism. In D&W the interpersonal violence is an extension of emotional processing, and an expression of who the characters are, and also why they are uniquely suited to help each other heal in ways their powers can't help with. Basically, violence is all they know and how they both solve all their problems, and being unkillable gives an opportunity to work out other traumas without they typical consequence of ending people who would want to help. But yeah of course there's an element of bias at play for all of us, and flaws in every movie to varying degrees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Lol simmer down, bud. You didn't make the movie; you just liked it. No need to take it personally

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I think I responded to the wrong person initially, but can I ask why saying "bud" is bad?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Because you're using language to try to "win" an argument simply by infantilising the opposition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    To tell someone to chill out. I could have said man or pal or friend, but I chose "bud" this time. I don't think it's an infantilizing term at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hmm, ok. Bud can come off a little condescending but I see you meant no ill will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There is a significant difference between something being entertaining to watch in the moment, and it being good.

    I watched D&W in theaters with my boyfriend. Had a deadpool themed margarita. Had an excellent time, highly recommend.

    Hours after leaving the theater, I started actually thinking about the movie. The more I thought about it the more I decided that it actually wasn't very good. At the time, I had a detailed list of complaints. I've forgotten the details since then.

    The broad strokes though, it's insulting.

    D&W actively disregards and insults established MCU canon. They had a chance to expand the lore, instead they shat on it.

    The best moments in the movie could be described as "HEY! HERE'S THAT THING YOU LIKE!!! YOU LIKE THIS RIGHT?!?! LIKE THIS!!!" Which is the most disrespectful kind of reference you can do, as it's insulting to the media and even more so to the audience.

    Ryan Renolds has a writing credit for this movie, and he has demonstrated that he fundamentally does not understand the metaphysics of marvel comics. Therefore, his commentary on the state of the MCU can fuck off. Sure, the later MCU movies had a lot of problems, but I can tell that myself, I have the power of media literacy on my side, so I can tell when the pot is calling the kettle black.

    If I were willing to actually put effort into it, I could come up with actual examples to go with my complaints, but I don't feel like watching the movie again any time soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Did you like the first 2 Deadpool movies? If so, what was worse about this one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It was lazy, it just did the same as before without adding anything new. It felt like watching the first one on repeat, sped up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Huh, I think that just wrong. The character of Deadpool is still him, which would be strange to change, but I think alot of it was unexplored before and an interesting contribution to the Loki storyverse. Also Hugh Jackman did a great job reprising the role of wolverine.

    Deadpool is a meta character, but despite that (or because of it?) I think it's a fresh take on the state of the MCU each time, taking pot shots at the existing formula from within it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is it Spider-Men or Spider-Mans?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›