After 2042, I wasn't very interested in this title to begin with so it isn't much of a loss. Gamers in general don't really care about rootkits (but will rage over launchers?), but I'm curious to see how well this will do after the trash that was 2042.
post
Oh well,.never mind
Meanwhile the game by the ex-DICE devs with superior destruction physics (THE FINALS) is playable on linux and pledged to remain so! :)
It's a ton of fun, you guys should check it out.
Dang I was really hoping to get a real feel for Microtransactions 6: vibe coded edition.
Quick question: what exactly happens when Microsoft flips the switch on rootkits like they are planning to do? EA gonna just pack it up? (I can dream)
I haven't looked at technical proposals or anything, but I'll bet that they will propose the equivalent to the Google Play Integrity.
Your anticheat software won't work unless you are booting Windows from supported hardware with a working TPM2 module and an unmodified kernel signed by Microsoft.
Haven't played it yet, but I've heard BattleBit Remastered is pretty good. I think it might even have 128 v 128 as an option.
Graphics and visual style much different though.
Battlebit is kinda dead after the devs started work on a sound update, failed to separate their prod and Dev source branches, and then realized they couldn't make small changes without finishing the actually really big audio and everything else update first.
Also, battlebit is in a bit of a weird spot; it was made by the dev team as an arma/squad replacement for people without high tier setups, but was first published with more arcade elements than that initial start would have you expect it to have. There's been a couple rumors that the devs aren't happy with how arcadey the gameplay for it is.
It's fun for what it is, but there's not a whole lot of players on it lately, and future gameplay elements aren't guaranteed.
If you think Hell Let Loose is realistic, then you haven't gotten into the milsim side of things yet, and it's great. Hell Let Loose wants to look realistic, but it plays like CoD.
It's my understanding that their original goal was more like ArmA, or maybe Squad.
For me personally, it had some of the features of a milsim, like quicker deaths, squad chat, medics, etc, but lacked a lot of the team-oriented objectives that bring a team together, like larger maps, even quicker deaths, stamina management, resource management and spawns.
Essentially, it was a bit of a rough combination of arcade and milsim and didn't quite fit the bill of either. If nearly every single gun takes 1-2 hits to kill someone, but spawns are setup so that they're all within 100 yards of the other team, it really can get overwhelming incredibly quickly.
At least, that's how it felt to me. If nobody is required to make spawn points since they just show up for the main objectives, nobody is going to bother to drive around and set it up better without being friends IRL, or actually just into that part of a milsim fps.
It feels a lot like BF2 back in the day but with a BF:BC2 and above style unlocking system. I'm surprised that was not the intention, and they want something more like Arma or Squad, when they clearly understand what used to make Battlefield so good since they replicated that and not ARMA or Squad.
There was a pivot from milsim to cod style gameplay after or around their first beta testing started. Apparently not enough people liked the milsim gameplay, so they switched to more arcade stuff instead. It was touted as a win for actually properly done user experience testing, and small development teams combining to allow for more agile direction adjustments. This where the 'remastered' title came in, despite being the first release they did.
Squad even has imo the best Star Wars mod (Galactic Contention). just be aware it's a much slower pace than battlefield/Cod and heavily depends on teamwork
Just be aware that it's a lot less 'first person shooter' and more 'strategy game from a first person perspective' these days. I'm still so mad about their infantry combat overhaul.
Also, more importantly, squad is only sort-of compatible with linux. They've got DRM that does break things on the linux side on occasion since it's not directly supported.
I've been playing Squad fairly frequently for a long time on Linux, usually without issue. Most game aren't technically supported, but they work perfectly fine, as long as the devs don't purposefully block it. With that said, I'm pretty sure OWI has said they actively support Linux now, with them recently adding support for Squad44 too.
(The current playtest this weekend for the next big update to UE5 won't let me join servers though, and I'm pretty sure it's an issue with Linux support.)
I also wouldn't say it's a strategy game in first person. Certainly that is a way some people will be playing, but most are playing an FPS, just much slower paced than most, and where you need to follow orders and work together to be effective.
you can still play BF3 and 4 with some work arounds. Liam (guy's site that this article is from) posted the other week on his site how to get 3 and 4 working. nothing major at all just a couple extra steps to get it going which is no biggie if you're on linux, you're used to the extra steps.
Holdfast is a pretty awesome. Most servers are 150 players but I have seen some at 64 and 200 players. It has proximity chat and most players have mics which can be funny at times. I cannot recall a game where you can talk to the enemy during a game, usually it was only in the lobby.
It’ll probably be unplayable on most systems for the first 6 months if the last few battlefield releases are anything to go by 😂
I know the resounding opinion is "so?" but things like this are the only things that keep me on Windows, sadly. My squad plays Warzone, and may play this. At the very least, when I upgrade I'll probably dual boot, but this is still dumb to me. You'd think the Steam Deck would encourage people. Ah well.
if its anything like 2047 nothing lf value was lost
They're going back to battlefield 4 for this one. Honestly I haven't been this excited for a pvp game in years, possibly since Titanfall 2. The gameplay they've been showing off looks incredibly fun.
Pro-tip: buy it on steam, open it so that Steam recognizes play time, write heinous review, issue refund.
It would be a real shame if someone were to organize a group of Linux players for the launch, to leave negative reviews about how they can't play the game on their Steam Deck...
The monkey's paw curls and… BF6 is now playable on Steam Deck, but Linux is still forbidden.
Wow, I havent heard of BF since BF3... it seems i will continue not hearing about it
I know others are like "oh well, anyway" but I remembered playing and enjoying bf3. I've avoided the other titles because of military FPS shooter fatigue.
Now though I'm almost desperate to have something that isn't souls like, but EA has to be EA. It's a shame, because I would've been up for paying the stupid amounts of money they normally charge to experience BF6.
I do have a PS5, but I don't have the monthly subscription (paying for online multiplayer is a mugs game), so I just simply won't buy BF6.
I was hoping that steam deck would get some love. Those games are a pain but I have friends who play it.
I have a windows VM but ea cheat doesn't lile vms either
Tin foil hat time but I said last year on Mastodon that the reason EA was killing games like Apex and Battlefield for Linux was that soon Microsoft was going to announce their own handheld and EA has close ties with MS due to EA Play on Gamepass for example. Sure enough less than a year later Microsoft announces their Xbox Handheld with Asus and guess which games will work on that.
Basically it'll be "you want to play Madden and Battlefield on a handheld? well don't buy the SteamDeck, get this Xbox Handheld instead!"
Will they also be missing out on microtransactions and quick time events??
Tpm, secure boot. I was starting to be interested in the return to bf3-4 I'll stick to Arma and squad.
Bf3-4 are not concerned by the anti cheat :3
it's funny cause just the other week I found out you can still play 3 and 4 on Linux so I was like "oh perfect! I do miss me some battlefield" I load up steam and see BF1, BFV, BF2042 but I could have sworn I also owned 3 and 4 and I do.....on Origin.
EA did it with Apex Legends, so this is no surprise.
I don't have any Windows PCs anymore, and I'm not buying a $200 Windows Pro license just to buy a $70 game with questionable recent history.
Potential customer lost.
PS: I think the fact that they've made this decision also provides insight to the game itself.
Hmm... Here I am trying to think when the last time was when I gave EA money for anything...
I guess the Mass Effect Remastered collection. I got that through Humble Monthly, but I'm pretty sure Humble gave EA money for that. So I gave money to EA through Humble...... That was quite a long time ago, though.
Haven't played anything in the battlefield series since bf2. Not surprised on this however, they gotta protect their profits. If someone was to create an anti-cheat for use on Linux it would make them a fortune.
The information department informs that there is nothing new to inform. More information when we are informed.
3% and growing. Be sure to remember the publishers that catered to Linux in the transition and those that cast us aside.
top 80 comments