Is this is the same Microsoft that wants EU to give github developers a lot of money to fund open source projects?
post
The user said Microsoft reached out 10 days later, asking them to fill out a recovery form and promising to help them "every step of the way," but they haven't heard from the company since.
More like nevery step of the way, am I right?
Google deleted a guys entire account for having pictures of his own son in the pool. Google also deleted a colleague's master thesis because he allegedly had a pirated book in his Google Drive - he owned the book, we have local stores that sell .epubs.
Now Microsoft deleted a LibreOffice's developer account.
Do you know what all of these examples have in common? Appealing doesn't work, "your" files were never yours if you give up control to a corporation, US big tech can't be trusted.
You don't have to go fully libre software (though maybe you should!) but at the very least use software that isn't taking your content hostage: have local copies, only accept local copies that are automated and using open formats.
As much as I'd love hating on Microsoft, I think this gross incompetence & shitty bureaucracy over malice from Microsoft. Kaginski was locked out of his account & Microsoft made it annoyingly difficult to recover. This is something I have also faced using Microsoft's enterprise products, something we pay a lot of money for.
The bane of my existence is visiting Microsoft community posts, where "MVPs" advertise their years of experience before suggesting the most banal advice ever.
DISM and SFC fixes everything, right? Right.
Don't forget to install the latest drivers!
I know what would help. Do you mind sending the details to me again although they're already in your original post?
On sending the information:
Microsoft bot: this issue has been marked as closed due to inactivity
I'm am too far removed from windows to understand what this comment means 😅
It's "defrag your hard drive" in a new hat and even less useful
I mean, I've had some luck professionally with strange intermittent issues being resolved simply by running those commands. For intermittent issues once I get stumped I'll run the sfc/dism commands while scanning the event viewer for any other leads and about half the time I'll leave the user with a "okay monitor and let us know if the issue returns" and sometimes that's enough to get rid of the issue
SFC is the system file checker, used to check a Windows OS install's files for any corruption and to replace them with legit working files. DISM (if I remember right) is a tool for turning a Windows install into install media, and has some similar features for ensuring the installed OS has no corrupted file issues.
So pretty much the option to "Verify Integrity of Game Files" for Steam Games, but for the OS. And also by Microsoft, so of questionable usefulness/functionality.
I spent almost 5 years in the trenches of tech support in a Windows environment. I still used those commands as a hail mary when I didn't have any other ideas and needed some extra time to research. I think I've only seen it actually help three times.
Loosely speaking...
SFC ≈ # pacman --database --check
DISM ≈ # pacstrap ...
On the 17th of last month, Reddit user u/deus03690 shared how Microsoft locked their account, which, among other things, contained 30 years of "irreplaceable photos and work" on OneDrive.
Who the Fuck is so stupid to store important information online without an offline backup?
If you're not a computer nerd, it's common to think Microsoft has a bunch of backups and that's the whole point of the cloud. He's not particularly stupid, he just got scammed like thousands of others.
In a just world, he'd successfully sue MS for damages.
It is not about whether a cloud provider has the necessary failure prevention techniques. This is about sovereignity over your own data.
If you store your data in a cloud, and it is not your cloud, then the owner of that cloud can cut off your access to this data at any time. With the usual contracts, your means to counter such moves are moot at best.
Having important data in your own hands is vital. I do not put data on the net that i cannot afford to lose - either, I don't care (e.g. like the contents of this post, if it gets deleted, I'm not hurt), or I do have the data here, in my own home, on my own servers, on my own backups.
You're right of course, but look at this like someone who's not a nerd. You don't have to maintain your own car. You don't have to cook your own meals. You don't have to fix your own plumbing or electricity. If you get sold a lemon, or were fed spoiled food, or your apartment is unlivable, then it's not really your fault and you often have legal recourse.
But you do have to learn a lot about the computer, and if you do it wrong everybody just calls you stupid. I'm lucky it's not like that for dancing.
This guy is a LibreOffice developer. He should be smarter than the average Internet Idiot. By far. By all means, he should know not to trust Microsoft.
And comparing this to maintaing a car or house is comparing apples and oranges. In those cases, I have rather clear legal means to get my rights. Online, not so much. And even worse for those living outside the US.
Fair, I was referring more to u/deus03690.
I'd even call him/her an idiot. Assuming the "30 years of irreplacable data" means that he/she is around on the internet for at least half the time, even this person should have learned from many cases like this that online only storage is not viable, especially for important data.
Lemmy tends to forget that we're almost exclusively computer nerds. I've been the voice to my family and friends (hopefully not to a religious point lol) about these such issues, and they're generally pretty receptive. But they aren't going to go out of their way to learn what I have, nor should they. I am merely my network's trusted IT pro, be it game servers for friends or most recently Immich for extended family.
If claiming our digital rights is framed as a free for all, we will never secure any protection before it's too engrained to object. Together, hell look at Lemmy itself, we can not only educate people on these issues, but be the IT role that actually knows how to run whatever service in a secure and truly private manner.
PS I have to give Immich some love here, no matter how many stories like OP's you show to someone, they aren't going to settle for less. And now that Immich is an option for my network, its features make it barely a question for those moving off of google. Another TB of storage? That will be 40$ one time. No nags, no bullshit. And the context search is freaking amazing, without ever having to train some corps model off of (more) of your images.
Its still stupid to trust anyone with your only copy of your important data, who can just disable your account in an instance without thinking twice about it.
I didn’t realize Codeberg offered email services. When did that start?
Oh, MS gave them a seal of approval and blessings to go get cred with the hacker anti establishment crowd?
How generous of them!
I don't use onedirve or google drive. The cloud is wack.
I know that saying this here is preaching to the choir, but don’t use Microsoft or Google products. None of them. They can and will take things from you. They cannot be trusted.
Are there really people who know what open source means that would see this and actually believe it? Who is that even for?
This is his blog article. https://mikekaganski.wordpress.com/2025/07/25/microsoft-anybody-home/
Looking at this, it looks more like Microsoft just screwed it's auth system in some way for him then intentionally banned him in particular.
I as an IT guy have seen this before SOHO office accounts as well and entirely agree that MS has entirely lost the ability to do IT infrastructure in any useful way. Even at an enterprise level, Exchange and outlook used to be convoluted to learn and administer before they became cloud based, as regedit was your friend and they always buried the settings. Now, it doesn't require a degree in IT, but rather a pointy hat and a reading of spell books to make things work... Sometimes. Sacrifices of interns might be necessary at the alter of Support, before they'll answer the phone and you realize they have no more knowledge then you to.
Heck Microsoft doesn't even allow me to use IMAP, and if I want to use a different client (and not the shitty web one), I have to get permission from my IT administrator.
Funnily enough, the same client (Thubderbid) doesn't need any confirmation on Mac or Windows, only Linux.
And now the important question: Sir, exactly how many interns have YOU sacrificed to Micorosoft Khorne? how many skulls did you provide for his throne?
It’s fun to assume this is Microsoft being petty but the most likely scenario is Microsoft has cut their operating costs to such extremes they no longer have usable services or products.
This always happens when business majors are allowed to make decisions.
All the more reason to get LibreOffice and OnlyOffice!
I ditched the latter
The connection between OnlyOffice and Russia has caused some controversy. The company has moved headquarters and attempted to hide its Russian ties through shell companies[21]. The company develops its product in Russia[22] and presents itself in the Russian market as a Russian company[23]. For this reason some Ukrainian businesses have moved away from OnlyOffice[24].
If I would run a global company based in Russia, I'd also try to hide it, even if no malice is taking place.
This kind of reaction is exactly why.
As long as it's open source, it should be fine, though.
There are more concerns in the world than just “is it open source?”
I'mbusing it and I haven't donated to them and probably won't after reading that bit so not sure how they are making money through me? So yeah it's different to paying a subscription for something else
You using this thing helps boost metrics and alert search engines and shit. That boosts their visibility. Just using the thing helps the project.
Frankly, if libreoffice made a cleaner looking UI that wasn’t stuck in the 90s more people would take it seriously. It’s functional, but curb appeal helps to attract people, to convince them to give it a chance.
While it doesn't bring it up to current standards, it does have a tabbed UI that you can enable by going to View --> User Interface

Personally, I don't fully understand why they don't make that the default and keep supporting the toolbar design as they've always done. I can't imagine there would be a big backlash from existing users who prefer the toolbar UI
Is everything Russian bad? I understand Ukraine not using anything Russian but the rest of the world?
this exact same thing happened to me a while ago. I really doubt some human blocked my account though. after hours of customer support call and emails (from another account) it finally got unblocked but neither yhe support agent nor me had any clue what happened.
I learned the lesson and gradually moved the dev accounts to a proton email instead.
when I moved to Linux a couple years ago I felt the exact same way. I dont' know how old you are but maybe you remember that feeling logging into win 95 or 98 for the very first time and falling in love with computers and what they could do.
I hadn't felt that way in decades and when I switched to Linux it made me feel like I was a kid again in the late 90s with my very first PC. Switching to Linux made me fall in love with Computers again.
It's alright - start off easy, do some browsing/text editing/etc, don't jump to complicated stuff. You'll get there!
If you come to Windows merely a few weeks after, you'll feel same discomfort that you feel now. Linux will become more familiar, easy, and predictable.
Just keep on going and enjoy your ride. Oh and - I hope you chose a simple, newbie-friendly distribution. Figuring out technicalities when you didn't yet have basics is no fun.
It looks more like Microsoft's usual incompetence than a conspiracy against LibreOffice...
Ah yes, the Trump approach to dealing with things you don’t like. I see.
Setting an example for the rest of the corporate assholes.
why work for evil corp microsoft when you can join the fsf without selling your soul to evil corp
That sucks but... I mean... It's not really surprising is it?
The most surprising thing about it is that you try to fuck with a company while using their services and expect nothing to happen.
Not really sure it’s ok for Microsoft to control people’s criticism of them.
It’s not surprising that Microsoft would try, because they’re assholes. It is really surprising that people just let them get away with it, vote for governments who would let them get away with it, etc
Of course it's not okay but so what? People need to stop acting like they are living in some fantasy where moral has worth.
In this reality we live in laws are enforced with violence, in all it's forms. So if you can't enforce the change you want to see in the world, nothing will change. They have the violence, so they will use it. Of course they will use it. And they will never change the system in a way so they lose power because that would mean they lose their access to violence, which means they lose access to the ability to form the world the way they want. Why should anybody give up that power? It would be stupid. Almost as stupid as to expect them to give it up freely because it is better for everybody.
People are not interested in that stuff. Talk with the average person and they don't know what is happening outside of their bubble.
Most people are just tired driftwood getting violated by the raging ocean waves. Their apathy is understandable.
What is not understandable is that someone who builds an alternative to a Microsoft product, knowing what scum they are, is still using their other product instead of alternatives that exist.
This is war. Of course they try to cripple your production.
"Fuck with a company" ??
Developing a perfectly legal competing product should not constitute "fucking with a company" and the very fact that it seemingly does is the problem here.
For it not to become perceived as "fucking with a company" competition should be normal, and it's normal when the winning side is often enough the new competitor. In other words, if there were a few companies making office suites, compatible between each other, and none of them would hold hegemony.
Because what's perceived is defined by what those holding power think. When they change often through competition, they hail competition. When they are the same companies for 30 years, then they would publicly flog and hang you for it if they could.
Similar to how in Linux 2.2 days some functionality lacking or some anarchist spirit were normal, and now Linux is almost authoritarian as a community. Because it's the main thing in its niche.
Or how Apple Computer was a good company when they were competing with Microsoft and others for normal personal computer market, and became crap after they've achieved long hegemony for the luxury segment.
Even Microsoft itself - when they feared some competition, it was W2K and XP, and when they stopped, it was the rest since.
People don't really believe in things they don't experience. Others' dignity/freedom/safety is important for a human when their own depends on it.
??? Companies are MEANT to be fucked with. They never have your best interests in mind. They only care about profit, profit, and greed.
Fuck Microsoft. Time to download LibreOffice!
(removed a few other ideas, see below)
Hey, just real quick, if you can list a series of restaurants and cafes you visit often I'd have a few calls to make and you'd have a very fun few weeks.
https://www.texaslonghorn.se/restaurang/stpaulsgatan/ I visit often. Do I get free meals now?
Oh, I'm sure you'd get some free extras at some point.
Again, anything important needs to be saved multiple places. While Mike should be able to use these services without issue, these issues continue to crop up since people first began saving things online.


all 43 comments