US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democrat, New York) isn’t fazed by Congress’ failure to move forward with the impeachment of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

From her perspective, Democrats have almost too many people to investigate once they gain control of Congress in January.

“There are so many criminals in this administration, it’s hard to figure out who should be, you know, the order of operations,” Ocasio-Cortez said in an interview with CNN’s Manu Raju on Tuesday.

“There are going to be many, many, many investigations,” she added. “I imagine many subpoenas, and we have to follow wherever the evidence takes us.”

all 75 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 17 hours ago (29 children)

Tier 1:

  • affordability efforts
  • universal healthcare
  • end Iran war
  • end military support for Israel

Tier 2:

  • abolish ICE
  • prosecute the corrupt
  • codify body autonomy
  • reform the supreme court

Tier 3:

  • end Cuban blockade
  • end the electoral college

This is by no means an exhaustive list, but they need to get results on Tier 1 ASAP in order to maintain progressive and MAGA turncoat votes.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    Not putting SC reform in tier 1 is an immediate L

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 16 hours ago (23 children)

    ... Sorry, off topic, but why is your icon the buc-ees mascot? Those guys chug maga cock like their life depends on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 child)

    Irony. Think punks and John Lennon rocking Mickey Mouse tees. Buc-ee's is the height of MAGA brain rot culture. A gas station treated as some sort of cultural identity.

    That said, they are great rest stops...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -4 points 15 hours ago (19 children)
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago (13 children)

    Are they big fans of gas stations over there?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (12 children)

    They're tankies. So they're big fans of obvious fascism and authoritarian ideas claiming it's basically anything else.

    Meanwhile the US is evil incarnatez and absolutely everything they do is bad, without exception. Russia and China do no wrong. Even when they do the exact same things.

    They're not big fans or critical thinking over there, and aggressively ban anyone not participating in the group think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 13 hours ago (11 children)

    You just replied to me to explain, in answer to my question "Why does dou9m think that I can expect every ml user to be a fan of a gas station brand?" is that its because they are authoritarians? Like I was making a joke obviously, but your response doesn't actually make any sense.

    Don't worry, we all know what tankies are, and we all think they are very silly and unimportant people. It's hard to spend any time on lemmy without knowing about them. I find the people who follow them around screaming about it to be just as annoying as they are.

    So for future reference: We get it, my dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago (10 children)

    Don't worry, we all know what tankies are, and we all think they are very silly and unimportant people. It's hard to spend any time on lemmy without knowing about them.

    I guarantee you a gigantic chunk of people on this site, and even more importantly, all of the people who will end up migrating to Lemmy over the following year, are going to have no idea how to even slightly define what a tankie is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (9 children)

    Give me a call when they hold any political power whatsoever <3

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

    The world’s most virulent one is literally POTUS lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago* (7 children)

    You think donald trump is a tankie?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago* (6 children)

    You think donald trump is a tankie?

    Let's see, hmm, is President Krasnov -- who has business in Russia, who helps Putin at every turn, having secret meetings with him and overturning established sanctions on Russia and low-key betraying Ukraine as much as possible while trying to appear as though he is not, who even has a fucking Russian operative code name -- is he, could he possibly be, a tankie?

    My god man. We will never know. It is a mystery of the goddamn universe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Oh my god thank you lol, saved my fingies a lot of typing. The only thing I’d change is this part tho:

    low-key betraying Ukraine as much as possible while trying to appear as though he is not

    I don’t think there’s been a single time in either Trump presidency where it felt like he and his regime’s cronies were anything but absolutely highkey, straightforward enemies of Ukraine.

    I mean fucking Vance quite literally brought Zelenskyy into the oval office to get some viral clips of him while his citizens are getting purposefully targeted by fucking missiles. Republicans as a whole have no, zero, argument for being anything but fascist, authoritarian, rapist, racist scumbags.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago*

    Your point is valid and well-taken; the only reason I did not go as far as that is because while Trump has absolutely done as much as he can personally, via the executive, to fuck Ukraine in the ass, he has also hidden behind others -- like Musk cutting off the military arm of Starlink -- and been restrained from the worst of his excesses by the Republicans that still very much support Ukraine. So I could write it and be technically correct, but I would not readily be able to source it as fact. You know, and I know, but sourcing it would be a prolonged undertaking.

    Also, keep in mind that as an older American, every time I type the name of that great country Ukraine, I am reminded of how Ukraine would not even been in this position had they not traded their nukes for American assurances, among others (including Putin himself on behalf of Russia) that if Ukraine were attacked we would readily defend them.

    Ukraine had gained independence, and to be a good world neighbor they willingly disarmed. Here we are, twenty-two years later, and of all the signatories and supporters of the Budapest Memorandum in 1994 and its terms -- Ukraine, Russia, the United States, the UK, France, and China -- one of them is the primary aggressor and the rest have all fucked right off or are providing only minimal support. It is deeply, deeply shaming to me as an American citizen that we have not supported Ukraine with all our might.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    Yeah thats russia, a capitalist nation since 1994? Do you read the news? it was quite a big event.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (2 children)

    That is literally nonsensical. Krokodil a bit too strong for you these days?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago

    Russia is literally just a shitty oligarch ridden country, it is not in any way communist. This is not a conversation, it's just recorded fact.

    We are not arguing, I'm telling you what reality is, and you are telling me donald trump is a tankie and russia is the soviet union still. This is silly, please see sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago

    Have you been living under a rock for the last 33 years? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Russian_constitutional_crisis

    In September and October 1993, following the increasingly visible tensions after December 1992, a constitutional crisis arose in the Russian Federation from a conflict between the then Russian president Boris Yeltsin and the country's parliament. Yeltsin performed a self-coup, dissolving parliament and instituting a presidential rule by decree system. The crisis ended with Yeltsin using military force to attack Moscow's House of Soviets and arrest the lawmakers.

    In the wake of the events, Yeltsin consolidated his position, further expanded the powers of the executive, and pushed through the adoption of the 1993 constitution of the Russian Federation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    You know I hate tankies as much as anyone else, but I'll honestly say JoMiran is one of the few .ml users who doesn't seem to be one.

    As in, they're actually capable of rational thought/discussion and has some decent takes from time to time, which a tankie would be utterly incapable of

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 10 hours ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago

    Wait what, when did anyone mention swastikas? I must have missed that part of the conversation. What I saw is that they said punks wore mickey mouse shirts. Which is a completely different thing.

    I'm not here to defend .ml as an instance, I think it's garbage and most of its users are disingenuous trolls and accelerationist edge lords who would rather see the world burn with no plan to rebuild after rather than contribute in any meaningful or reasonable way to any sort of productive discussion whatsoever.

    That being said, I've seen JoMiran around on different threads and they don't act like the usual .ml user. There's a couple others too, but they're very much the exception rather than the rule over there. That's all I'm saying.

    And I never listened to the sex pistols, but there are plenty of punk bands who hate nazis, and honestly the punk ethos is diametrically opposed to fascism, so that weird subgenre of nazi punk is not only an oxymoron, but they're also just a bunch of posers appropriating the aesthetic and not really punks. They would get chased out of any regular punk venue. Call it gatekeeping if you want but nazis are not punk, even when they try to call themselves that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    Sigh. Anti-NATO and pro-China is not pro-Russia. If anything, we agree with you libs that China and the USA are fighting a proxy war using Russia and Ukraine as condoms.

    The US provoked it, Russia started it, then China stepped in and used the opportunity to make Russia completely economically dependent on them.

    Russia sucks in so many ways. Ukraine sucks way less because they were the ones who got invaded, and I'm far more on their side, but they have problems too. The people of both countries are being used and thrown away by unaccountable foreign bastards (and domestic bastards in Russia's case).

    It's just a game to the people at the top. China wants to limit Western advancement on their western flank, and the US/NATO wants to kill Russians and advance their economic influence into countries previously dominated by Russia.

    It's two capitalist markets trying to gain power over each other. We at ml think the solution to this is to bring down capitalism, and the major other communist faction on Lemmy is to do that but bring down the state as well.

    Now, does any of this sound like we are pro-Russian to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    Jeffries represents the Epstein class. Anyone voting for him is dead to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 18 hours ago* (11 children)

    NGL kind of wish some of these congresspeople would stfu so the criminals have less time to prepare before January.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

    Criminals are going to do what criminals do. The election results were a warning, they'll prepare for things even if everyone was quiet about it. I say keep talking, pump up their anxiety. Get Trump pissed off more, he tends to fire people then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago* (2 children)

    I remind you that the case against Trump after his first term ended relied heavily upon classified documents secretly stored in Maralago, some of which were flushed down toilets.

    The secret service communication devices and servers all got "accidentally" wiped once congress subpeona'd them.

    If we give crooks time to prepare then they will successfully destroy evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago

    I agree with that point. I'm not sure legally what can be done about that with the standing Congress, as the majority aren't going to do anything. Plus, who is in charge of implementing law enforcement? The Executive Branch.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

    Because it's Kabuki theatre. Nothing more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah. bullshit.

    Democrats should be looking at making real change:

    1. Reducing Presidential powers substantially. No more pardons and vetos and executive orders.

    2. Sweeping reform with new harsh anti-corruption laws.

    3. Term limits for the house. two terms and done.

    4. Criminalize stock trading among congress.

    Fix the rot going forward...no? then they are just looking for their turn at the trough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago*

    Agreed, although I think before angthing they need to prosecute every single person from John Roberts to every single person Trump has pardoned. Put them all in ICE holding cells like the terrorist illegal aliens they are.

    Unfortunately it would take decades of non-uniparty rule to fix this so everyone under 30 can kiss their futures goodbye lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    Too bad Fungus Con can hand out pardons faster than Congress can indict his henchpeople

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    Accepting a pardon is accepting guilt. In doing so they wave their 5th amendment rights and can be compelled to testify. Which they should all be. Everything thurroughly investigated and documented. Hopefully re incriminating them and others with state charges.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 11 hours ago

    There’s a lot to probe and arrest but make it work. You go after everyone. Have have to do it all while you work on your campaign promises and fix what Trump broke. All of it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 13 hours ago
    [–] 5 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

    She really blew it when she decided to announce that she wasn't going to back anyone else against establishment "leadership."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

    She's on a tightrope.

    She has a lot of people whispering in her ear to primary Schumer in 2028, and calling for someone else to be the majority leader would essentially be a declaration of intent when she's still weighing her options between that, running for President, accepting a VeeP nomination, or maybe joining the cabinet in 2029.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    That's not a tightrope. Those are just different ways for her to personally respond to the same problem. She could say Chuck and Hakeem suck publicly and all of those options are still on the table.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    If she doesn't persue Schumer's seat in 2028, she'd be making a powerful senator from her own state an enemy needlessly. She has no vote in the Senate leadership, and she's not going to change the mind of anyone who does have a say in it. Her strongest allies in the Senate are already going to vote against him. What good does publicly chastising him do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago

    It lets her constituents and supporters know that she understands and shares their position. That's the whole purpose of having a representative in the first place. They are supposed to say things on your behalf, and not only when it benefits them personally. In fact, I would argue that you can't be a good representative if you aren't willing to do that when it doesn't personally benefit you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    Ooh, how scary! Well luckily Hakeem Jeffries who she endorses is going to do nothing about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 hours ago

    Well luckily Hakeem Jeffries who she endorses is going to do nothing about it.

    You've twisted her words, and she's already explained it.

    The Speaker selection takes place in roughly three weeks via a fixed ballot. There are no write-ins. Candidates who want to be considered have to write a letter to the entire Democratic house caucus announcing their intention.

    Right now, today, there is no one other than Jeffries on that ballot.

    So explain to the rest of us how she -- or any other House dem -- can elect a different candidate for Speaker when there is no other candidate currently running.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago (5 children)

    I wish American news would stop reporting on what Democrats MIGHT do ... and just report on what they already did.

    They keep pumping this endless hope fountain and its getting tiring ... I'd rather hear about what was actually done rather than listening to the possibilities.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 17 hours ago* (2 children)

    They don’t even get sworn into office until January 3, and you’re already upset that they haven’t done enough?

    Until then, the present minority has essentially no power.

    So, for now, they’re talking about what they plan to do once they do get the majority in Congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 14 hours ago

    magas will obstruct and ignore subpoenas and Dems will get blamed for not doing anything, hope I'm wrong and good luck!

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    Sure AOC. I believe you just as much as you said Biden was tirelessly working on getting Israel to agree to a ceasefire.

    How many times have the Democrats obtained power, done nothing, then let it go right back to the Republicans again? They are beyond worthless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -10 points 17 hours ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago* (3 children)

    You’re downvoted for this but you’re right, even though I (and probably most of the people who downvoted) assume you’re a rightwing dork.

    Off the top of my head: Hailey Stevens, Schumer, Fetterman, and Jeffries are all deserving a long and litigious battle at the ICC where they are hopefully sentenced to strict punishments for being directly involved in genocide. I’d go as far to say that both Biden and Trump should be as well, which then sets a precedent for both Bush and Obama to be indicted by them as well.

    And yes I’m aware about how the US feels towards the ICC, that should absolutely change too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago (1 child)

    It is funny to me. The comment about criminals on both side infer that the right has criminals. But I am used to idiots who ignore all my condemnation of trump and the right every time I criticize dems

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 16 hours ago

    Don’t take it too personally, we’re all pretty much on red alert because we don’t have a reliable information pipeline like we did in the 00s/10s for a little bit

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

    It's the same dynamic as shouting all lives matter was back in the day. All lives Do matter, but that ain't why you're saying it right now. We see you. (edit the proverbial you, not talking about the guy I'm replying to)

  • source
  • parent