Democrat Abdul El-Sayed’s former opponent in the Michigan Senate primary, Haley Stevens, is appearing with Republican candidate Mike Rogers at a Detroit church after intraparty tensions have boiled over days before the election.

The appearance comes after the congresswoman was uninvited to a joint event Sunday with El-Sayed, who defeated her by a slim margin in the August primary.

Stevens has been critical of El-Sayed’s comments surrounding Israel. Her fiance said last week he was voting for Rogers, claiming El-Sayed had not done enough to address concerns of the Jewish community.

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 95 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

This is just more confirmation that the right candidate won. Losing the primary and then supporting the republican is some scummy shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    I am a Democrat in Michigan and the first thing i am doing tomorrow morning is calling every goddamn number I can find and insist they kick Haley out of the fucking party.

    She's a rat-fuck traitor.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    We just dodged a potential Kyrsten Sinema.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    She and her horse-faced fiance are mid-manic burndown of everything. She going full-on Bonnie and Clydesdale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago* (2 children)

    I'd say more of a discount Stephen Miller than horse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Ummm. I guess you don't need to.

    (Chair of the Michigan Democratic Party)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    State party, good start.

    I want to see the same statement from Jeffries. Take away her D label in congress. Take away her caucus vote, her committee seats. You can't allow treachery like this. It would be like a gang allowing undercover cops in their ranks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 1 week ago

    While I could come up with well reasoned arguments against Rogers, you really only need one: HE DOESN’T FUCKING LIVE IN MICHIGAN.

    He can fuck off back to Florida where he belongs, and Stevens can go with him.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    He is a real threat to the establishment. Unlike Mamdani, he was born here (*meaning, he can become president). He's actually a medical doctor, and he tells the truth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmodf-lNGEE

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    This woman and her husband are evil. They want to subject this country to further fascist descent for a paycheck from their owners. Those same owners are in the epstein files and part of a broader circle of powerful perverts and slavers.

    Stevens, Rogers, Trump, Thiel, Musk, Netanyahu, Barak, Wexler...all joined together. This is who we're dealing with.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    When I read her campaign site, it was just a bunch of generic feel good happy bullshit without any specific stances or commitments. That's when I knew I was voting for El-Sayed in the primary. Glad I was able to see through her worthless bullshit. Go fuck yourself sideways, Hailey. I voted today and couldn't be happier to cast mine for El-Sayed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    More than appearing with, she's now given a full on Mike Rogers endorsement.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2026/11/01/haley-stevens-endorses-mike-rogers-michigan-senate-01144698

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago
    [–] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Remember the day before the NYC mayoral election when Trump endorsed Andrew Como who was running as a spoiler candidate against Mamdani? I see similaries.

    Good job Michigan for not letting Haley Stevens win the primary. We cannot afford another John Fetterman in the Senate.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    This is the central philosophy of "centrism". Whenever you vote for a centrist, this is who you are voting for.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Sore losers gonna loser.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago

    What turnoil? She's a sideshow.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Remember to VOTE BLUE no matter WHO!

    -Haley Stevens (D) who's CAMPAIGNING with Mike Rodgers (R)!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

    Can't tell if sarcasm...

    Edit: WHY do you COMMENT like THIS? I was trying to understand if you were being sarcastic or not and your comment history is full of EMPHASIS via CAPS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It's a novelty account, so it's sarcasm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    I guess this is meant to cast Stevens as a generic avatar of "centrist"-death-mask-wearing conservatives who demand unconditional support from progressives if they win but won't give it back if they lose?

    But I don't know if Stevens said or demanded that, so it's a bit confusing, and could also be read to attack the phrase "vote blue no matter who." Which is a turnoff since it mimics right-wing sarcastic comments meant to mock democratic voters who vote for "least evil" dem candidates over fascist right candidates - i.e., intended left turnout suppression. So seems like the novelty bit is getting in the way of actual, you know, communication.

    Those were just some of my hilarious, important thoughts on the inherently funny topic of sober, lengthy deconstruction of comedy. (That was sarcasm, if such a thing can possibly work without all caps.) (That was also sarcasm. /s) (Despite the "/s," that last one wasn't sarcasm.) (Feeling good about this one.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I had to ask, because Stevens isn't the candidate you're voting for... So vote blue no matter who ™️/s doesn't quite hit because she got primary'd.

    Which is WHY PEOPLE NEED TO VOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

    Whoops, too many caps this time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    No no, the caps made me understand your sarcasm!

    Wait, no, sorry.

    No NO, the CAPS made me understand your SARCASM!

    Oh, that's better.

    But I wasn't trying to be sarcastic. And neither were you! DAMN IT.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    This is why the Separation of Church and State is so important.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Something is wrong in you. If an white supremacist like Tucker say I would never vote for Roger but a democrat would

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    She is a great real time example of why the Who part of voting Blue Matters. I'll won't support AIPAC shills like her. Her using Black voters as a prop for the endorsement was nasty work.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    We should have insulted her voice more. Chris Farley looking brother-fucker.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    She was a piece of shit before. This isn't surprising.

    Told her primary campaign to fuck off on the isreali dick it rode in on when they spammed me for support.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    What a piece of shit

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    Fat lot of good it did them.

  • source
  • It's not turmoil when white people act like white people. I keep telling everyone we're not to be trusted. Anyone white who uses church for political reasons is a fascist waiting to gain power.

  • source
  • 153 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    2 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post