all 65 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I don't think they plan on voters being an insurmountable problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 74 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    That’s the unsettling part. When billionaires spend fortunes shaping elections, it’s reasonable to ask whether they see voters as citizens to persuade or obstacles to manage. Democracy becomes a lot less inconvenient when you can fund the candidates, influence the platforms hosting the debate, and lobby the people writing the rules. All perfectly legal, of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Y'all should stop using the word lobby and call it what it is. Bribery. The only reason your country isn't stupid corrupt at face value is because you legalized bribery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Annoyingly it also turned the word "lobby" into a contaminated dirty word, even though lobbying is a healthy and important part of a functional democracy.

    Any group collectively arguing in favour of their interest to the government is a lobby. That group can be anything from employers, to unions, to civil rights advocates.

    The problematic part is the bribery, not the fact that there is interest groups lobbying the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    We're so fucking dumb, our very first amendment to the Constitution gives us the right "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." We should amend that so people wanting to band together for a given cause can get bent. How about that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    The tolerance paradox had yet to materialise when that was written. Yes we should amend that to specify people, not corporations.

    And 'grievances' such as "I want all the money and yet I don't have it. Please fix this. Thx" should not be allowed to be lobbied for.

    Most of the constitution needs major work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 75 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Turns out telling people your technology will replace their jobs, devour their electricity, and possibly end civilization isn’t the winning sales pitch billionaires imagined. Imagine spending hundreds of millions buying political influence, only to discover voters don’t enjoy being treated like obsolete hardware.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 weeks ago*

    telling people your technology will replace their jobs, devour their electricity, and possibly end civilization isn’t the winning sales pitch billionaires imagined.

    "but what you guys aren't getting is the fact that it'll make me a lot more money."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    AI is still not viable business. All that fear mongering is to create an alternative revenue sources.

    "look, I created a monster that can destroy us all. Please give me money to contain and tame it. We can't destroy it because our enemies are creating their own monsters."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Expect bipartisan legislation to increase the anonymity of PAC money before the year is over.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't be surprised if more than half of democrats would be ok to give republicans more power so that they can squash progressive wing of democrats who are making people realize how useless half of democrat party is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Definitely half the Senate; they've been there the longest, and seem more interested in internal party structures and hierarchies than governing. Some of them seem genuinely shook by the way Trump has upended Democratic norms, but even then they seem like they just want to get back to business as usual.

    The good news is that I don't think the current leadership is long for power. Schumer came across like such a weak imbecile in the shutdown negotiations that even centrists want him gone. Jefferies might hold on for another term because he kept the caucus together during the shutdown, but he's heavily tied to AIPAC, and that is now deeply toxic to most Democratic voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago

    Which billionaires aren't flooding money into politics to influence elections? They were doing it long before all the AI drama.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Hello Americans! Please vote! Sincerely, everyone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I’m not trusting the US voting system anymore. I think it’s going to be rigged and they won’t get over the republicans. I still hope that midterms will change the way USA behave, but I’m not going to hold my breath for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Trump's claims of election rigging as so dumb because they can't even come up with a plausible way it could have happened. We have 90,000 polling places, across 50 states, all of whom run elections their own way. There's no central database to hackerman. Best anyone could possibly do is maybe sway the local dog catcher election. Maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 weeks ago* (13 children)

    I can only hope this is true. Most voters aren't paying a bit of attention to where the money comes from.

    They're using AI. They think it's wonderful, they've barely heard about the controversy around data centers, and think "data centers are where the internet it, yOU lIkE thE inTErNeT, Don'T yoU?"

    The Top 10 AI Uses in 2025 (none of which it does very well):

    • Therapy and companionship
    • Organizing my life
    • Finding purpose
    • Enhanced learning
    • Summarizing content
    • Generating ideas
    • Generating code (for professionals)
    • Improving code (for professionals)
    • Creativity
    • Visual art and design
  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    My thoughts exactly. I know two folks who are going all in with AI and haven't even considered any controversy. Feels like they live on another planet. Hell, one of the guys was even showing off his pervert glasses and when I called them pervert glasses he laughed and said he hadn't heard that before.

    I really hope those folks are in the minority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Dang. Their online filter bubble must be strong. Likely the kind of person who also doesn't care about surveillance capitalism because "it'll recommend good things to buy."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Quite right! When they email me for advice it's often AI generated, too. I always come across as the insane person telling them not to trust AI (why even ask me for advice if you're just going to vibe coded your site anyway...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    You'd be surprised. Data centers seem like a big issue. My boomer parents hate data centers, as do a lot of rural voters who have them nearby or proposals nearby. But to your point, I also see a lot of people who are aware of problems around ai/data centers/billionaires still using ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (5 children)

    The problems with data centers are not the data centers, it's missing regulation about where and how to build data centers.

    It's a very American problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    So, you also cannot discern the difference in traditional DCs and AI DCs? I feel like you know and I'm missing something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Scale. Older data centers fit in the "light industrial" zoned parts of town and required some minor grid upgrades to the local electrical distribution.

    Planned data centers require as much power as an entire rural state and are the size of a small town and get buit too fast to wait for any new power generation to be added to the grid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    By backfiring you mean they have nearly total control then yes. Those losers, it has totally backfired on them and now they are richer and more powerful than ever!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    I'm sick of all the shiny shoes and the posturing. I need a serious person with substance.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    The next step seems obvious: they'll take a page from the tobacco, gun, and meat industries and instead create fake think tanks or associations to funnel political money semi-anonymously.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    AI Billionaires Are Flooding Money Into Politics are flooding politics with money, or pouring money into politics.

    This is grade school stuff, FFS!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago*

    their efforts aren't buying the political capital they'd hoped for.

    Trump did get elected by "AI money" and they all celebrated on stage with him, you know.

    Midterms? Yeah, when you are an indisputably shitty President who has broken every campaign promise and is openly deranged, you will likely lose the midterms no matter how much you try to pump Republicans. Diminishing returns.

    Usually the "winning" party only holds power for a couple terms, then, after their incompetence has disgusted yet another generation of voters, they lose, only to be replaced by the other party that will repeat the process.

    bOtH sIdEs, YeS, oH My

    I vote in every election, and you should too. Because it's funny

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 weeks ago

    Capitalism is incompatible with democracy.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    All Dems have to do is run with Data Center Prohibition as their main issue, and they would win EVERY election, and destroy the MAGA movement. Even Republicans hate Data Centers, and ALL MAGA candidates LOVE them. No MAGA candidate cans say anything against them. Florida MAGA candidates are trying to ease it by claiming that they'll make sure that citizens won't pay the costs, but everybody knows they're lying. That's about the most opposition they're putting.

    MAGA is the party of UNLIMITED Data Centers. Just slam that over and over, and NOBODY will vote MAGA.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Both sides are taking data center money, though.

    Here in Michigan, Governor Whitmer (Dem) is all-in on AI, even doing photo ops at (extremely locally unpopular) data center groundbreakings. "Think of all the local jobs" is the supposed upside. (spoiler: there are no local jobs being created)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Troll Musk. Vote Democrat.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    should also campaign for third option so there are options and idiot party could be left to wither. Current situation leads to slow and inevitable fall as stagnation is the very best that can happen.

    Anything that makes republicans weaker is a win for your country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Give us each $100,000 and I'll consider it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    I thought someone did the math and said if all US billionaires were slaughtered and the money divided amongst US population, we'd all get like $400k+.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    IF the billionaires are really worth their money.
    Unluckily the billionaires are only theoretically worth their money since it depends on the value of their shares in the companies, shares value that is only supposed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    $400k in shares is still more than I have

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Everyone who goes into politics wants money. Musk gives them money. Profit!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    I wouldn't be surprised at all if Futurism articles are just written by AI tbh...

    Low bar journalism and reporting.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Turns out that taking hubris to far, thinking that the public will suck it all up just because they always did does have its turning point.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Don't forget cryptocurrency (UK Reform party big whoopsie)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Same billionaires are funding the campaigns of both parties. they keep winning no matter who gets elected.

    It feels surreal to live among the gullible

    Add to that, I have a hunch that a good chunk of people who are the most vocal against AI heavily use AI themselves. like game devs using ai to produce music, and musicians use AI to make posters, and novelists using AI to illustrate their works, many people call for solidarity against AI to save their professions while using AI to replace other professions.

    I am one of the most haters on AI, but I two acknowledge that people are hypocrites on the internet

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 2 weeks ago

    Stupid sexy Stalin...

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago

    The Billionaire capture of our screens and thoughts has been very successful overall. Stay vigilant.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago

    Elon Musk alone has pumped more than $445 million into Republican campaigns ahead of the midterms, after spending a near-equal sum to get president Donald Trump elected in the last election cycle. Leading The Future, a Super PAC backed by OpenAI and Palantir cofounders and prominent tech venture capitalists including Marc Andreessen, has amassed $140 million to dole out to pro-AI candidates.

    From wikipedia about Leading the Future:

    In May 2026, the Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that super PACs associated with Leading the Future evaded federal transparency requirements by funneling payments through shell companies.[22] Contributions to Leading the Future in 2026 include $50,000,000 from Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen and $25,000,000 from Greg and Anna Brockman.[23]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_the_Future

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

    This is propaganda to get the left to stay home and not vote.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    The general thrust of the article is just that voters don’t want to vote for someone backed by the LLM industry. Propaganda like you’re describing exists, but this is not it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (8 children)

    Ok, maybe not propaganda, but misleading.

    Three quarters of the likely voters said that they would be less apt to vote for a candidate if they found out they had accepted a donation from an AI Super PAC.

    Less apt? Grandpa may hate AI, but that's not going to stop him from voting for Mike Rogers. These articles create a false sense of victory and that hurts the left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Less apt? Grandpa may hate AI, but that’s not going to stop him from voting for Mike Rogers. These articles create a false sense of victory and that hurts the left.

    Where is your evidence of this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (5 children)

    The fact that a criminal, insurrectionist, rapist won a presidential election. No more evidence needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    There’s no concrete evidence that any election was stolen, and until there is you sound just like them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago*

    Is it backfiring, though? [Gestures broadly]

    This is a bullshit headline and pretty much propaganda against voting regardless of the content.

  • source