He might have something resembling a point if he were running a nonprofit.

I understand where you’re coming from, thanks.

The general thrust of the article is just that voters don’t want to vote for someone backed by the LLM industry. Propaganda like you’re describing exists, but this is not it.

Kinda unnecessary there pal

“Old Godzilla was hopping around Tokyo city like a big playground…”

I have it stuck in my head now hahah

Don’t forget the value of actually knowing your codebase if you wrote it… or the value lost if you just have an LLM do the whole thing.

Cross products! If you take the cross product of two edges of a face, you get a perpendicular vector for that face. It shouldn’t be too bad to do 20 of those per frame to find if a face is level with the ground (cross product points straight up and/or down depending on how you’re doing them)… now I don’t know about the velocity/acceleration numbers (including rotation)…

If you use something like four bytes instead of one, your error drops dramatically... If you're generating numbers from 0-100, You'd have ~50 "bad" cases (just imagine the remainder is the same) out of 4 billion instead of ~50 out of 256. Unless you're running a casino or something (and even then...) it's probably "fine enough" but of course you have to know about it!

You can, as of this very moment, download a 16 GB LLM and run it on your local computer. Or any bigger version, if you happen to have a beefy computer. LLMs are software. Good luck banning software. This is the internet.

ALSO, even if you do happen to be able to ban AI training facilities and such in the U.S., and those models become outdated, you can even go download some Chinese models too! They are not going away.